Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Rakesh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2019 CRL.REV.P. 666/2019 SH. RAKESH KUMAR versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Dayal, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.12045/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.A.12074/2019 (for condonation of delay in filing) & Crl.M.A.12047/2019 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 1. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a poor person and was incarcerated and his wife is also uneducated and was not in a position to arrange for funds to engage a counsel and was not aware that she could approach legal aid for filing the petition. Subsequently, she approached the legal aid and the petition has been CRL.REV.P.666/2019...
Ministry of External Affairs and Anr vs.sh. Rajender Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30.05.2019 $~46. * + % W.P.(C) 6446/2019 MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS AND ANR......... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Farman Ali and Mr. Shahan Ullah, Advs. versus SH. RAJENDER SINGH AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj V. George with Ms. Shilpa Liza George, Advs. for R-1 to R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CAV No.616/2019 Learned counsel for the respondent caveator has appeared. The caveat stands discharged accordingly. C.M. No.27368/2019 W.P.(C.) No.6446/2019 Page 1 of 11 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. C.M. No.27367/2019 This application has been moved to seek condonation of delay in filing the petition. Considering the fact that the impugned order was passed by the Tribunal on 23.07.2018 and there is no limitation prescribed for preferring a writ petition, we allow this a...
Anwar @ Sono & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3010/2019 ANWAR @ SONO & ORS Date of Order: May 30, 2019 .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Raju Yadav. Ms. Roshini Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.12116/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3010/2019 Quashing of FIR No.184/2016, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 13th February, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Raju Yadav on the basis of identity proof CRL.M.C. 3010/2019 Page 1 of 3 produced by her. Respondent No...
Castmaster Mobitec India Private Limited vs.delhi Transport Corporatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :30. 05.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 102/2018 CASTMASTER MOBITEC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.Arun Mohan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Saurabh Jain, Mr.Kuber Giri, Ms.Sarika, Mr.Vinayak Bhandari, Advs. along with Mr.Rahul Jain, AR of the petitioner versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr.N.K.Singh, Ms.Sakshi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) Rev. Pet. 154/2018 1. The present review petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking review of the judgment/order dated 01.03.2018 passed by this Court dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). O.M.P.(Comm.) No.102/2018 Page 1 The petitioner challenged the Arbitral Award dated 20.11.2017 as also the order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Arbitrati...
M/S Athena Energy Ventures Pvt. Ltd. Vs.andhra Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2019 + W.P.(C) 3527/2014 M/S ATHENA ENERGY VENTURES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ANDHRA BANK ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Tarun Johri and Mr Ankit Saini. : Mr P.B.A. Srinivasan. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an action of the respondent (Andhra Bank hereafter the Bank) in debiting a sum of 68,93,783/- in the petitioners current account maintained with the Bank. The petitioner also seeks recovery of the said amount along with interest. The Bank had debited the said amount as commission charges for the unexpired period of a bank guarantee that was surrendered by the petitioner. W.P.(C) 3527/2014 Page 1 of 13 the Bank had not The petitioner claims that informed the 2. petitioner that any such charges would be payable at the time of the issuance of the ba...
Yogender @ Gogi & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 30, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2997/2019 & CRL.M.As. 12061-12062/2019 YOGENDER @ GOGI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. M.K. Khanna & Mr. Rajesh, Advocates. STATE & ORS. Versus Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with SI Shiv Singh. Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate with Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.288/2014, under Sections 279/308/3of IPC, registered at Police Station Saket, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 21st May, 2019 of respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared amongst the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent Nos. 2 to 5 present in the Court, are the complainants/first-informants of FIR in question and they have been identified to be so, by SI S...
People for Development & Progress vs.airport Authority of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~3 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5172/2019 & CM APPL. 22909/2019 PEOPLE FOR DEVELOPMENT & PROGRESS........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Mani Pandey, Advocate AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS versus Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Kirat Randhawa, Ms.Priya, Mr. Milanka Chaudhary & Mr.Dipan Seth, Advocates for R-2-3/DIAL Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. G.S. Oberoi, Ms. Disha Sachdeva & Ms. Parul Panthi, Advocates for DDA/R-4 Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal & Ms. Bushra Waseem, Advocates for SDMC/R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and is termed as a Public Interest Litigation. In the first paragraph, an averment has been made that the petitioners have no personal interest in the litigation. It is not guided by self-gain...
The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited and Anr. Vs.union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 05.2019 Pronounced on:29. 05.2019 CM APPLN. 14120/2019 in W.P.(C) 3070/2019 $~1 to 4 * + SAMSON MARITIME LTD. AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mahesh Agarwal, Mr.Rishi Agarwal, Mr.Amitava R. Majumdar, Mr.Karan Luthra, Mr.Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms.Manjira Das Gupta, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Pinky Anand, ASG with Ms.Saudamini Sharma, Mr.Balendu Shekhar & Mr.Sumit Teterwal, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-3 & 4. Mr.Rajesh Ranjan, Adv. with Ms.Kritika Sachdeva, Adv. for Shipyards Association of India. CM APPLN. 14123/2019 in W.P.(C) 3071/2019 THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mahesh Agarwal, Mr.Rishi Agarwal, Mr.Amitava R. Majumdar, Mr.Karan Luthra, Mr.Pranjit Bhattacharya & Mr Adit Pujari, Advs. versus + W.P.(C) 3070/2019 & batch matters P age 1 of 25 ...
Panchkuian Furniture Market Association (Regd.) vs.delhi Metro Rail Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2019 + W.P.(C) 7775/2016 PANCHKUIAN FURNITURE MARKET ASSOCIATION (REGD.) versus ........ Petitioner DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with : Mr Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate. : Mr Pushkar Sood, Advocate for : R-1/DMRC. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner is an association of persons who were earlier carrying on their business from the shops located at Panchkuian Road, New Delhi. They were carrying on their business under License/Tehbazari rights granted by the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereafter MCD). The said market at Panchkuian Road was required to be removed for the development of the Mass Rapid Transport System (MRTS). Accordingly, MCD terminated the licenses/tehbazari rights granted to members of the petitioner associati...
g.s. Developers & Contractors pvt.ltd. Vs.alpha Corp Development Priva ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :29. 05.2019 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 54/2019 & IAs 8116-8117/2019 G.S. DEVELOPERS & CONTRACTORS PVT.LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Mohit Chaudhary, Mr.Kunal Sachdeva, Advs. versus ALPHA CORP DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ayush Agrawal, Mr.Vikrant Singh, Mr.S.N.Samith, Mr.Debesh Panda, Mr.Mangesh, Mr.V.K.Verma, Advs. along with Mr.Praveen, AR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) praying for termination of the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator and for appointment of a Substitute Arbitrator in his place.2. The arbitration proceedings between the parties were earlier being conducted by the Arbitrator appointed by the respondent. The respondents unilaterally declared the mandate O.M.P. (T)(Comm.) Nos.54/2019 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »