Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Allauddin vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:25. h October, 2018 Judgment Delivered on:31. t May, 2019 CRL.A. 81/2018 ALLAUDDIN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ankur Sood and Ms.Romila Mandal, Advocates STATE versus Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for State ..... Respondent with SI Nitin Kumar, PS Geeta Colony Mr.Sunil Fernandes and Mr.ArnavVidyarthi, Advocates for BSES YPL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal Allauddin challenges the impugned judgment dated 16th December 2017, whereby he was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 135 Electricity Act and the order on sentence dated 18th December 2017 directing him to undergo simple imprisonment for the period of one year six months and to pay a fine of 26,74,422/-, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence punishable under Section 135 Electricity Act.2. Assailing the conviction, Learned Counsel for the appellant s...
Vineet Gupta vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* % + STATE + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h May, 2019 Decided on:31. t May, 2019 CRL.A. 74/2017 MOHIT RAJORA @ GOTU ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. M.C. Sharma, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Saurabh, P.S. Govind Puri CRL.A. 362/2017 VINEET GUPTA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, DHCLSC Mikhail Advocate STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Saurabh, P.S. Govind Puri ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By these appeals, appellants Mohit Rajora @ Gotu and Vineet Gupta challenge the impugned judgment dated 8th December 2016 wherein they were convicted for offences punishable under Section 3IPC in FIR No.252/2014 registered at PS Govind Puri and the order on sentence dated 16th December 2016 whereby the appellants were directed to undergo CRL.A. 74/2017 & 362/2017 Page 1 of 8 rigorous imprisonment for a period...
M/S Kushal Infraproject Industries India Ltd. Vs.bhoom Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t April, 2019 Date of decision:31. t May, 2019 CS (OS) 2170/2013 & I.A.13164/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. ..... Plaintiff Aditya Singh, Advocates. versus DALEL SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula & Ms. Taran Narula, Advocates. WITH CS(OS) 2376/2013, IA No.11525/2018 & 13181/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. versus BHOOM SINGH & ORS. Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sonali Dhir with Mr. Aadhar Nauityal, Adv. for D-13 Mr. Y.P.Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula, Advs. for D-17 WITH CS(OS) 305/2014 & I.A.13163/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. PARVESH KUMAR & ORS versus Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y....
Aditya Kumar vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order :31. t May, 2019 $~11 * % + W.P.(C) 6588/2019 ADITYA KUMAR UNION OF INDIA & ANR CORAM: ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ajay Kohli, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Yashish Chandra, Mr. Piyush Gaur & Mr. Yashaswi SK Chocksey, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for R-2. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL278412019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6588/2019 & C.M.27840/2019 (stay) 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.4. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be suffering from Beckers Muscular Dystrophy which is a rare X-linked recessive inherited disorder characterized by slowly progressing muscle w...
Shabnam Dhillon vs.zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 13.12.2018 Judgment Pronounced on 31.05.2019 ARB.A. (COMM.) No.18/2018 SHABNAM DHILLON ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao with Mr. Akshay Sharma and Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra, Advocates. versus ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LTD. & ORS. ..... RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yakshay Chheda and Mr. Aman Shukla, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J: Prefatory facts 1. This is an appeal directed against the order dated 22.2.2018 passed by the learned arbitrator under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act). For the sake of convenience, the parties to the proceedings will be referred to as under: (i) Ms. Shabnam Dhillon, the appellant as SD; (ii) Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd., respondent No.1 as Zee. ARB.A. (COMM) No.18/2018 Pg. 1 of 20 (iii) SGGD Projects Development Private Limited, respon...
Ms. Aparna Bhattacharya vs.nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. No.5429/2017 & CRL.M.A. 21186/2017 Judgment reserved on :06. 02.2018 Date of decision :31. 05.2019 Ms. APARNA BHATTACHARYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Yash Anand, Advocate versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution r/w Section 482 of the Cr. PC, 1973 seeking quashing of the order dated 09.10.2017 of the learned ASJ-03, PHC, New Delhi in CR No.100/2017 vide which the order dated 20.12.2016 of the learned MM-05, PHC, New Delhi in CC No.1589/1/2016 was upheld vide which the complaint under Section 156(3) of the Cr.PC, 1973 filed by the petitioner herein as complainant i.e. the petitioner herein of the said case was dismissed, which ought to read as application under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C., 1973.2. The averments made in the application u...
Mohd. Shahrukh vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d October, 2018 Decided on:31. t May, 2019 CRL.A. 127/2018 MOHD. SHAHRUKH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Kushal Raj Gupta, versus Advocate THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Naveen, PS Seelampur CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Mohd. Shahrukh challenges the impugned judgment dated 24th October, 2017 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC in FIR No.589/2016 registered at PS Seelampur and the order on sentence dated 3rd November 2017 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three and a half years and to pay a fine of 500/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the complainant Sonu Kumar who was examined as PW-4, deposed contrary to his statement before the police and does not s...
Kamal @ Sachin & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3083/2019/2019 KAMAL @ SACHIN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Karamveer Tyagi, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr.M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Ram Niwas. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.12425/2019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3083/2019 1. Quashing of FIR No.87/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Binda Pur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 25th April, 2018.2. Upon notice, Mr. M.P.Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Ram Niwas, on the basis of identity proof produced by her.3. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that ...
Sterlite Technologies Limited vs.ztt India Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~3. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 314/2019, IA No.8386/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.8389/2019 (u/O XXVI R-4,9&10) & IA No.8390/2019 [u/O XI R-1(6)]. STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Archana Shankar, Ms. Prachi Agarwal and Ms.Ridhie Bajaj, Advs. ..... Defendant Through: None. versus ZTT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER3105.2019 IA No.8387/2019 (under Order XI Rule 1(4) for filing additional documents).1. The application is disposed of by permitting the plaintiff to file additional documents latest along with the replication if any filed to the written statement of the defendant.2. The application is disposed of. IA No.8388/2019 (for exemption).3. 4. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CS(COMM) 314/2019, IA No.8386/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.8389/2019 (u/O XXVI R-4,9&10) & IA No.8390/2019 [u/O XI R- 1(6)]..5. The plaintiff has sue...
Ashok Kumar Arora vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 31, 2019 CRL. A. 602/2013 C.B. SINGH Through: Versus ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Mr. Amit Rathor, Advocates. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 601/2013 R.K.GUPTA Through: Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Advocate Versus ..... Appellant CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 600/2013 RAKESH KUMAR Through: Versus Mr.R.P.Luthra, Advocate and Ms.Sourabhi Luthra, Advocate ..... Appellant CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. Crl.A.No.602/2013, 601/2013, 600/2013 & 596/2013 Page 1 of 12 + CRL. A. 596/2013 ASHOK KUMAR ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anup Kumar and Mr.Subodh Versus Prasad Deo, Advocates CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Publ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »