Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dehat Vikas Shiksha Samiti Bewal and Anr. Vs.national Council for Teac ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4404/2019 & CM APPLs. 19578-79/2019 Date of Decision:29. h April, 2019 DEHAT VIKAS SHIKSHA SAMITI BEWAL AND ANR. Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, SC for NCTE with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against a refusal order dated 30th August, 2018, passed by the Northern Regional Committee (hereinafter referred to as the NRC) of the National Council for Teachers Education (hereinafter referred to as the NCTE), whereby, in exercise of powers conferred by Section (3) of the NCTE Act, 1993, the application, of the petitioners, for recognition/permission to start a two year B.Ed. Course in the MDS College of Education, Mahendragarh, Haryana, has been refused.2. Incidentally, the impugned refusal order records the fact that the pe...
Shri Amarjeet & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2230/2019 SHRI AMARJEET & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Garima Bhardwaj, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajesh Kumar Mr. Vinod Kumar Dubey, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.351/2013, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 30th October, 2018 (Annexure P-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajesh Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2230/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute betwe...
Prem Kishore vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6058/2018 PREM KISHORE ........ Petitioner Through Mr Sunil Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr Dhruv Grover, Ms Ashwarya Anand, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Abhinav Tyagi, Advocates for R1/UOI. Mr Anand V. Khatri, Mr H. Sharma, Advocates for R2. Mr T. Singhdev, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Amandeep Kaur, Ms Puja Sarkar, Ms Bhakthansangi Das, Advocates for MCI. Mr Praveen Khattar, Advocate for R4/DMC and MCI/R3. Mr Subhash Kumar, Advocate for R5 to R10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2904.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning on order dated 01.06.2016 passed by the Delhi Medical Council (DMC) confirming the observations of the Disciplinary Committee of DMC that there was error of judgement in the treatment W.P. (C) 6058/2018 Page 1 of 8 of the petitioners wife (since deceased) but rejecting the recommendation...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.anand Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~31 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 04.2019 + MAC. APP. 508/2019 & CM Nos. 19911-12/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. Versus ANAND SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(ORAL) The appellant impugns an Award dated 01.02.2019 which inter alia 1. awarded compensation for loss of future income. It is the appellants case that since the injured/respondent is a government employee and he would continue to be in government service, therefore, there would be no loss of future income and nothing should have been granted to him under this head. He relies upon the dicta of the Supreme Court in Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Kumar & Anr. in Civil Appeal No.8981 of 2010, wherein it was held as under:-"10. Ascertainment of the effect of the permanent disability on the actual earning capacity involves three steps. The Tribunal has to first ascertain what activities...
Sunil Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2243/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8961-8962/2019 RAHUL SHARMA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Kaushik Ghosh. Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CRL.M.C. 2287/2019 & CRL.M.A. 9061-9062/2019 SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Kaushik Ghosh. Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR No.66/2015 under Sections 354/506/5of IPC and FIR No.347/2015 under Crl.M.C. 2243/2019 & Crl.M.C. 2287/2019 Page 1 of 3 Sections 498-A/4of IPC, both registered at P...
State (Nct of Delhi) vs.pradeep @ Sonu and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 277/2018 % Judgment reserved on:04. h April, 2019 Judgment pronounced on: _29th April, 2019 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with SI Munna Kumar, PS Delhi Cantt. versus PRADEEP @ SONU & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Crl. M. A776818 (Delay in Filing) For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay 18 days in filing the present leave to appeal, the delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Crl. L. P. 21. By this petition under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter as Cr.P.C), the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 15.12.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, South West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi whereby the accused Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 6 were acquitted of the charge under Sections 394/395/120B/4of the Indian Penal CRL.L.P. 277/2018 ...
Vijay Shankar Aggarwal vs.sunita Aggarwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 04.2019 + FAO(OS) 84/2019 VIJAY SHANKAR AGGARWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Bharat Gupta with Mr.Vishesh Chauhan, Advs. + + versus SUNITA AGGARWAL & ORS Through: None. FAO(OS) 85/2019 VIJAY SHANKAR AGGARWAL ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Bharat Gupta with Mr.Vishesh Chauhan, Advs. versus SUNITA AGGARWAL & ORS Through: None. FAO(OS) 87/2019 VIJAY SHANKAR AGGARWAL ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Bharat Gupta with Mr.Vishesh Chauhan, Advs. versus SUNITA AGGARWAL & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI FAO(OS) 84/2019 & connected Page 1 of 6 VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos.19322/2019, 19355/2019 in FAO(OS) 84/2019 C.M. No.19324/2019 in FAO(OS) 85/2019 C.M. No.19354/2019 in FAO(OS) 87/2019 Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 84/2019 FAO(OS) 85/2019 FAO(OS) 87/2019 1. The appellant has preferred...
Saurabh Saxena & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2194/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8774/2019 SAURABH SAXENA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sikandar Azam Khan, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sandeep. Mr. Yogesh Saxena, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.316/2016, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 23rd April, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sandeep on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2194/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between ...
Amit Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2205/2019 AMIT KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. K.P.Singh, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Sumit Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 8809/2019 (exemption) CRL.M.C. 2205/2019 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Quashing of FIR No.857/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 24th January, 2015 and affidavit of 27th March, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sumit on the basis of...
Star Dental Centre Pvt. Ltd vs.karnataka State Dental Council & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 216/2019 STAR DENTAL CENTRE PVT. LTD. KARNATAKA STATE DENTAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Defendants $~11 * + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. Through: Mr. Pavan Duggal, Adv. Versus ..... Plaintiff % IA No.5988/2019 (u/S149CPC) 1. ORDER2604.2019 The counsel for the plaintiff undertakes that the requisite court fees shall be deposited within the course of the day.2. Accepting the said undertaking, the time for deposit of the court fees is extended.3. The application is disposed of. IAs No.5987/2019 & 5989/2019 (both for exemption) 4.5. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. IA No.5990/2019 (u/O V R-9 CPC) 6. As and when summons are ordered to be issued, the same will be ordered to be served by email.7. The application is thus infructuous and is disposed of. IA No.5992/2019 (u/O XI R-1(4) CPC) 8. For the reasons stated, the plaintiff is permitted to file the additional documents latest wit...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »