Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
John Laing Infrastucture Management Services India Private Limited (In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~CP-23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:29. 04.2019 + CO.PET. 12/2019 JOHN LAING INFRASTUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Adv. for the OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL) for voluntary winding up of JOHN LAING INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL. LIQN.)(herein referred to as the said company).2. A perusal of the petition shows that the said company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act on 06.02.2008, having CIN U74120DL2008FTC173635 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana (ROC), having authorized share capital of Rs. 20 Crores divided into 20 lakhs equity shares of Rs. 10/- each. The Paid up capital of the said company was Rs. 9,96,50,000 (Rupees Nine Crore Nine...
Ashish Kanchap vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~23. * + % W.P.(C) 4418/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 04.2019 ASHISH KANCHAP ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Omung Gupta, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, St. Counsel, GNCTD (Services) with Mr. N.K. Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Ms. Ahlawat accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Looking to the nature of controversy raised, and the order that we propose to pass, we do not consider it necessary to call for a reply from the respondents.2. The petitioner assails the order dated 12.03.2019 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.815/2019. The learned Tribunal has rejected the petitioners Original Application, wherein his grievance was that in relation to six questions W.P.(C.) No.4418/2019 Page 1 of 7 posed in the examination for the post of P...
Mr. Vicky Thareja & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2223/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8888/2019 MR. VICKY THAREJA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. H.R. Dhamija, Advocate Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Vaishali. Mr. Rakesh Walia, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1006/2014, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 17th December, 2018 (Annexure G) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Vaishali on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2223/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the C...
Bharat Singh vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~3 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL.) 260/2019 Judgment reserved on:2. d April, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:29. h April, 2019 BHARAT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Isha Khanna, Ms. Nidhi Raman, Mr. Anam Ahmed and Mr. Rajan Lal Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC (Crl.) for Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl.) with SI Jitender Kumar, PS- Sonia Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J W.P.(CRL.) 260/2019 1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) for setting aside the order dated 19.12.2018 passed by the Lt. Governor, Delhi and order dated 11.10.2018 passed by Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, North-East District, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are as under: (i) That the process of externme...
Gurbaksh Singh Sachdeva vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 746/2019 Judgment delivered on:29. 04.2019 GURBAKSH SINGH SACHDEVA ........ Petitioner versus STATE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.R.N.Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP with SI Shrikrishna, P.S.Hari Nagar. Mr.Mahesh Khanna, Adv. for the complainant along with the complainant Manjeet Kapoor. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.203/2015 under Section 420 IPC, Police Station Hari Nagar.2. The allegation in the FIR are that the wife of the petitioner had entered into an Agreement to Sell of property bearing No.GB-1, G-8, 2nd Floor with roof rights, G-Block, Hari Nagar, New Delhi for a sale consideration of Rs.15 lakhs and part payment of Rs.7 lakhs was paid by two cheques, one of Rs.4 lakhs and the other of Rs.3 lakhs.... Petitioner is alleged to be a witness to the sai...
Mrs. Archana Tuli vs.director of Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P(C) No.10324/2015 and CM No.25740/2015 Judgment reserved on :17. 07.2017 Date of decision :29. 04.2019 MRS. ARCHANA TULI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.R.K.Saini, Advocate versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Adv for R- 1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide the present petition seeks the quashing of the action of the respondent No.1, Director of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi, vide which she was declined re-employment for a period of two years after her superannuation on the ground that the petitioner was not professionally fit and sought that the respondent No.1 be directed to grant her re-employment forth with and to allow her to re- join duty on the post of a Vice Principal treating her to having been automatically re-employed after the date of superannuation i.e. 31.7.2014 till she completed the age of 62 years and to give ...
Jitender Sharma vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
#J-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 1241/2018 JITENDER SHARMA Judgment Reserved on:11. 03.2019 Judgment delivered on:29. 04.2019 ...... Appellant versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ...... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Manu Sharma, Ms. Mahima Wahi and Mr. Kartik Khanna, Advocates : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with SI Sandeep, PS-Begampur and Inspector Suman Kumari, Community Policing Cell, Outer District CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C') assails the judgment and order of conviction and order on sentence dated 30.05.2018 and 05.06.2018 respectively, in Sessions Case No.21/2013, titled as 'State vs. Jitender Sharma s/o Sh Om Prakash Sharma, emanating from FIR No.19/2013 CRL.A.1241/2018 Page 1 of 21 (hereinafter referred to as the 'subj...
Northern India Masonic Charitable Society vs.south Municipal Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: March 29, 2019 Judgment delivered on: April 29, 2019 NORTHERN INDIA MASONIC CHARITABLE SOCIETY + W.P.(C) 6530/2013, CM No.14201/2013 SOUTH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI versus Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for SDMC ..... Respondent with Ms.Biji Rajesh and Ms. Eshita Baruah, Advs. for SDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The challenge in this petition is to an order dated May 30, 2013 passed by the Municipal Taxation Tribunal (MTT in short) dismissing the challenge of the petitioner to the assessment order dated August 12, 2005.2. Some of the relevant facts are that, on May 28, 1997, the rateable value of the land belonging to the petitioner society / school was fixed at Rs.30,00,000/- with effect from April 01, 1997. The said order was subject matter of a writ petition filed W.P.(C) No.6530/2013 Page 1 of 15 by the petitione...
Snehalata Kumudini Jain vs.the State & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 08, 2019 Pronounced on : April 29, 2019 CS(OS)2186/2011 & I.As.14251/2011, 4281/2012, 20377/2012, 20378/2012, 20379/2012, 1394/2013, 3395/2016, 5156/2018, 5157/2018, 5453/2018, 6035/2018, 6036/2018, 6523/2018 USHA JAIN & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Adv. SNEHALATA KUMUDINI BARNABAS versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj and Ms. Sagrika Wadhwa, Advs. TEST.CAS. 45/2012 & I.A. 5449/2018 + SNEHALATA KUMUDINI JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj and Ms. Sagrika Wadhwa, Advs. versus THE STATE & OTHERS CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA Through: Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of the consolidated suit [CS(OS) 2186 of CS(OS) 2186/2011 & TEST.CAS. 45/2012 Page 1 of 43 2011]. and the testamentary case [Test Case No.45 of 2012]., wherein common evidence was led by the parties on interconnected issues arising from interrelated ...
Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4467/2019 & CM APPL.19840/2019 VODAFONE IDEA LTD. ........ Petitioner Decided on:29. h April, 2019 Through: Mr.Deepak Chopra, Mr.Harpreet Singh Ajmani & Mr.Manasvini Bajpai, Advocates versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ajit Sharma, Sr.Std.Counsel with Mr.Adeeba Majahid, Jr.Std.Counsel & Mr.Ashutosh Senger, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) % 1. Issue notice. Mr.Ajit Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice.2. By the order impugned in this writ petition, the ITAT, according to the petitioner, has conclusively determined certain issues on which it had at the same time directed a remand. This Court had on 01.06.2018, in the assessees appeal for the concerned year [ITA No.660/2018]., directed as follows: W.P.(C) 4467/2019 Page 1 of 6 The Court has considered the submissions of the parties; the ITA...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »