Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satbir Rana vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. t April, 2019 + BAIL APPLN. 246/2019 SATBIR RANA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anjana Ahluwalia, Advocate STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State Mr. Pradeep Teotia and Mr. Siddharth Chaturvedi, Advocates for the complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner alongwith others, including his son Nikhil Rana, is facing prosecution in sessions case (no.1422/2016 old no.09/15) arising out of the reports (charge-sheets) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted upon conclusion of investigation of first information report (FIR) no.5of police station Ghazipur, and the charge for offences under Sections 302, 120-B read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and for substantive offences under Sections 201 and 202 of IPC. The case relates to homicidal death (murder) of one Vinod, by fire-arm...
Prince Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 564/2019 Judgment delivered on:01. 04.2019 PRINCE SINGH STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Abhinash K. Mishra and Mr. Gaurav M. Pandey, Advs. For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ravinder Kumar : JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.61/2018 under Sections 392/397/506/411/120-B/34 of the IPC, Police Station Jama Masjid.2. The subject FIR has been registered on the complaint of an employee of Sanjay Sales Agency.3. As per the complainant, he was instructed by the owner to transport goods and money in a van from their shop at Fateh Puri, Delhi to the factory at Patparganj, Delhi. It is alleged that the complainant had put four boxes in the back of the van containing BAIL APPLN. 564/2019 Page 1 of 4 goods and Rs. 15 lakhs in cash. ...
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs.sombir & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$-16 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 04.2019 MAC.APP. 421/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sankar Sinha, Advocate SOMBIR & ORS versus Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 14847/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to just all exceptions. MAC.APP. 421/2019 and CM APPL.14848/2019 (STAY) 1. By the instant appeal, the appellant insurer assails the impugned judgment award, whereunder, a total compensation of Rs.4,94,768/- has come to be awarded to the respondent no.1 the injured, for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident involving Car bearing Registration MAC.APP. 421/2019 Page 1 of 5 No.UP-14 BU2590 in short the offending vehicle, of which, the appellant is the insurer. Concisely, the relevant facts are that on 29.11.2017 at about 12:00 2. noon, when the injured along with a pillion rider was going to his village driving motor cycle bearin...
Piyush Goel @ Piyush Goyal (In Custody) vs.central Bureau of Investiga ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 27, 2019 Pronounced on: April 01, 2019 (i) + CRL.A. 526/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1347/2017 SURESH KUMAR LAKRA Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Tiwari & Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates (ii) + CRL.A. 523/2016 PIYUSH GOEL @ PIYUSH GOYAL (IN CUSTODY) Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate (iii) + CRL.A. 520/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1346/2017 JAIBIR SINGH SEHRAWAT @ JAIBIR SHERAWAT (iv) + CRL.A. 499/2016 MUKESH GUPTA Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Through: Mr. Ganesh Khanna & Dr. Sushil Gupta, Advocates (v) + CRL.A. 495/2016 & Crl.M.(B) 257/2017 UMESH PARASHAR Crl.A.526/2016 Crl.A.523/2016 Crl.A.520/2016 Crl.A.499/2016 Crl.A.495/2016 Crl.A.480/2016 Page 1 of 29 1. Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate (vi) CRL.A. 480/2016 & Crl.M.A. 15869/2016 VIRENDER PAL Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Versus Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate .... Appellant...
Amit Kumar Soni & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 01, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1695/2019 AMIT KUMAR SONI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shubham Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Pradeep Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.483/2018, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Model Town, North West, New Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 23rd December, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pradeep Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1695/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties...
Om Prakash Daral vs.yunus Ali & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:01. 04.2019 + FAO(OS) 98/2018 OM PRAKASH DARAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates versus YUNUS ALI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Advocate (appearance not given). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 14728/2019 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the reply by respondent No.1 is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 98/2018 & CM APPL. 44942/2018 3. A suit for specific performance was filed by FIITJEE Limited, in respect of property No.59A/1, Plot No.10, Village Kalu Sarai, New Delhi- 110016. A decree for perpetual injunction to restrain the respondents/defendants from forcefully dispossessing the appellant/plaintiff/FIITJEE Limited from the suit property was also sought, along with a prayer for restraint against the respondents/defendants...
Const. Nemi Chand and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~1 to 4 & 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 873/2018 CONST. RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS. Through Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra & Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law & Mr. Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 2407/2018 CONST. RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS. Through Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar & Ms. Santwana, Advocates Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law & Mr. Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF * + + + W.P.(C) 2427/2018 CONST. MUKESH KUMAR BAJIYA Through Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr. Panel counsel , Mr. R.M.Tripathi, Mr. Abhimanyu, W.P.(C) 873/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 8 + + % Mr. Abhishek Khanna & Mr. Soumaya Karmakar, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC...
Davinder Singh Dhindsa vs.the State (n.c.t of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 344/2019 Date of Decision:1. t April, 2019 DAVINDER SINGH DHINDSA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Mr. Abhik Kumar, Mr. Rinku Mathur, Advs. Mr. Suryadeep Singh, versus THE STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC, Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Adv with Insp. Pawan Kumar, PS IGI Airport. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.0196/2018, under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station IGI Airport, New Delhi.2. The brief facts of the case are that on 18.04.2018 the petitioner along with his wife, son and sister was travelling from New Delhi to Canada; by China Southern Airlines bearing flight No.CZ-360 and W.P (CRL) 344/2019 Page 1 of 8 during the course of screening, One cartridg...
Sh. Puspender Yadav & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 01, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1696/2019 SH. PUSPENDER YADAV & ORS. Through: Mr. Vikram Yadav, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Devender Singh Ms. Nimmi Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.269/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Govind Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of respondent No.2s affidavit of 25th March, 2019 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Devender Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties...
Raju Kumar & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 01, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1700/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6833/2019 RAJU KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Satyawati. Mr. Neil Wadia, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.135/2017, under Sections 498-A/406/3of IPC, registered at police station Khyala, New Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 22nd January, 2018 (Annexure-B) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by W/SI Satyawati on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1700/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »