Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State (Gnct of Delhi) vs.mr X.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 04.2019 CRL.REV.P. 17/2017 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Mr X. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Lalit Chauhan, P.S.Timar Pur. For the Respondent : Ms. Kanchan Dewan, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) SINCE THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED IN THE PRESENT CASE IS THE FATHER OF THE VICTIM, IN ORDER TO CONCEAL THE IDENTITY OF THE VICTIM, THE NAME OF ACCUSED/RESPONDENT, THE DATE OF BIRTH OF THE VICTIM AND SOME OFFENSIVE MATERIAL HAS BEEN REDACTED IN THIS JUDGMENT. THE REGISTRY IS DIRECTED TO REDACT THE NAME OF THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FROM THE CAUSE TITLE. CRL.REV.P.17/2017 Page 1 of 8 Crl.M.A.249/2017 (Delay of 8 days in filing the revision petition) 1. Subject petition has been filed with a delay of 8 days. It is contended that the matter had to be considered fo...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd vs.m/s Unity Builders
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 974/2012 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD ........ Petitioner Date of Decision :2. d April, 2019 Through: Mr.S.K.Singh, Mr.Rameezuddin Raja, Advs. along with Mr.Anil Kumar Sharma, Executive Engineer(C), KKD, MTNL versus M/S UNITY BUILDERS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vikas Sharma, Mr.Ashish, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 28.04.2012 along with the order dated 12.06.2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement No.EE(C) V/MTNL/AG/06-for the Construction of T.E. Building at Mayur Vihar, Phase-II, New Delhi (balance work awarded by the petitioner to the respondent). O.M.P. No.974/2012 Page 1 2. The challenge to the Award is to the award...
Babbu Khan & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 02, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1716/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6923/2019 MR. IMRAN KHAN & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Saroj Dutta Bakshi, Advocate Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in person. + CRL.M.C. 1718/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6925/2019 BABBU KHAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Obeori, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions quashing of cross FIR Nos. 941/2014 under Sections 354/323/451/4of IPC and FIR No.Crl.M.C. 1716/2019 & Crl.M.C. 1718/2019 Page 1 of 3 942/2014 under Sections 354/3of IPC registered at police station Krishna Nagar, Delhi are sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registrati...
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement vs.idbi Bank Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : February 25, 2019/ March 27, 2019 Decided on : April 02, 2019 + CRL.A. 143/2018 & Crl.M.A. 2262/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus AXIS BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shri Singh, Advocate with Mr. Pradyumna Sharma, Ms. Maneka Khanna & Ms. Sayali Kadu, Advocates for R-1. CRL.A. 210/2018 & Crl.M.A. 3233/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for R-1. + Crl. Appeal No.143/2018 & others Page 1 of 105 + CRL.A. 623/2018 & Crl.M.A. 10886-87/2018, 48245/2018 DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. vers...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.om Prakash Yadav & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:02. 04.2019 % MAC.APP. 909/2015 & CM APPL.13712/2019 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K. Soni and Mr.Pavan Kumar, Advs versus OM PRAKASH YADAV & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate for the respondents no.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1. Though the matter is taken up on an application made by the claimants/ respondents no.1 and 2, for release of the amounts lying in fixed deposit, as jointly prayed, the matter is taken up for hearing on the appeal itself.2. By the appeal, the appellant insurer, in effect, extends challenge to the quantum of compensation awarded to the parents of deceased, Manoj Kumar Yadav in short 'the deceased', who died, as a result of the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident, in which, the truck bearing No.RJ- MAC.APP. 909/2015 Page 1 of 5 11 GA1036in short the offending vehicle, was invol...
Channel Vas Services India Pvt Ltd. Vs.bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~12 & 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 189/2019 CHANNEL VAS SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD. ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with briefing counsel. versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED Through: Mr. Sameer Agarwal, Advocate .....Respondent ARB.P. 190/2019 CHANNEL VAS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with briefing counsel versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED Through: Mr. Sameer Agarwal, Advocate. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER0204.2019 * + + SANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The facts of both the petitions are similar and a common question of law arises and therefore both the petitions are being decided by a common order. ARB.P. 189/2019 & ARB.P. 190/2019 Page 1 of 10 2.... Petitioner company is engaged principally in the business of providing certain software and related services to telecom companies. Respondent is a telecommunication company engaged in operating cellular mobile s...
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Delhi vs.axis Bank & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : February 25, 2019/ March 27, 2019 Decided on : April 02, 2019 + CRL.A. 143/2018 & Crl.M.A. 2262/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus AXIS BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shri Singh, Advocate with Mr. Pradyumna Sharma, Ms. Maneka Khanna & Ms. Sayali Kadu, Advocates for R-1. CRL.A. 210/2018 & Crl.M.A. 3233/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for R-1. + Crl. Appeal No.143/2018 & others Page 1 of 105 + CRL.A. 623/2018 & Crl.M.A. 10886-87/2018, 48245/2018 DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. vers...
Mr. Imran Khan & Ors vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 02, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1716/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6923/2019 MR. IMRAN KHAN & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Saroj Dutta Bakshi, Advocate Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in person. + CRL.M.C. 1718/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6925/2019 BABBU KHAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Obeori, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions quashing of cross FIR Nos. 941/2014 under Sections 354/323/451/4of IPC and FIR No.Crl.M.C. 1716/2019 & Crl.M.C. 1718/2019 Page 1 of 3 942/2014 under Sections 354/3of IPC registered at police station Krishna Nagar, Delhi are sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registrati...
Raja vs.state (g.n.c.t of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
* % + RAJA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h October, 2018 Decided on:2. d April, 2019 CRL.A. 1186/2016 Represented by: Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan Chauhan, ..... Appellant S.S. and Mr. Advocates versus STATE (G.N.C.T OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Amit Dutt, PS Lajpat Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Raja challenges the impugned judgment dated 27th April, 2016 convicting him for offences punishable under Section 363 IPC and Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short POCSO Act) and the order on sentence dated 29th April, 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months, for offence punishable under Section 363 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/-, in default whereof to undergo sim...
Shreya Tuli vs.national Institute of Fashion Technology, Delhi and Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8619/2018 SHREYA TULI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Dang, Adv. with Ms. Kanika Jain, Adv. versus NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FASHION TECHNOLOGY, DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Swetank Shantanu, and Mr.Pratap Ms.Shilpi Shrivastava, Advs. Shanker CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner, who was pursuing the final semester of her bachelors degree course in fashion and lifestyle accessory design with the National Institute of Fashion Technology, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the NIFT), was required to work off-campus on a project under the guidance of the NIFT faculty and submit the project for appraisal as part of the prescribed curriculum. Guidelines for the internship, to be undertaken by the candidates, including the petitioner, were contained in an undated circular, issued by the Department of Fashion and Lifestyle Accessory Desig...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »