Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N vs.s S
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:02. d April, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 17/2018 N S S ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik and Mr. Brahm Kumar Pandey, Advocates for the appellant along with appellant in person versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.C. Phogat, Advocate for the respondent along with the respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 24.10.2017 passed by the Family Court on a petition filed by the appellant herein under Section 13(1) (ia) and 13(2) (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of the marriage on the ground of cruelty.2. Marriage between the parties was solemnized on 02.12.2001 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies at New Delhi. A male child was born out of their wedlock on 08.09.2005. It is the case of the appellant that since the beginning of her marriage, ...
Honey Rajpal vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 04.2019 BAIL APPLN. 766/2019 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent HONEY RAJPAL versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Mr. K. Singhal, Adv. Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with SI Nitu Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of one month to enable the petitioner to undergo mandatory training programme i.e. Advanced Information Technology (AICITSS) of 15 days required to be undertaken after clearing Chartered Accountancy Exams for registration as a Chartered Accountant.2. Status report has been filed and the same is taken on record. It confirms the above averments of the petitioner. BAIL APPLN. 766/2019 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier also granted interim bail to appear in the exams of Ch...
Mohd. Mehtab Alam vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1569/2019 MOHD. MEHTAB ALAM ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Saini and Mr. Rajiv Diwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for University of Delhi Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Tarun Verma and Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advs. for the MCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition deals with the mark sheet of the petitioner in the Third Provisional Part-II MBBS-2017 Examination, conducted by the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, specifically the marks awarded to the petitioner with respect to Paper II in the Examination, i.e. the Surgery paper. The marks awarded to the petitioner, in the Surgery paper, in the aforestated examination, may be set out in a tabular form thus: W.P.(C) 1569/2019 Page 1 of 9 2. Regulation 12(4)(d) of the Medical Council of India, Regulation ...
Rajesh Kumar and Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 02, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1711/2019 RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS Through: Mr. Awijit Paliwal, Advocate. .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sanjeev Kumar. Ms. Hiral Sehgal, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.6915/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1711/2019 Quashing of FIR No.794/2014, under Sections 323/341/324/506 r/w Section 34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Respondent No.2s affidavit of 11th March, 2019 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the CRL.M.C. 1711/2019 Page 1 ...
Daya Ram vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~23 & 24 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 53/2019 Decided on:2. d April, 2019 DAYA RAM Through: Mr. R.K. Tarun, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Sharma, Adv. & Mr. Shubham Prajapati, Advocates versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. + CRL.A. 121/2019 FATEH SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. M. Naushad, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have been held guilty and convicted and sentenced in case arising out of first information report (FIR) No.168/2012 of Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur for offences under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Crl. Appeal No.53/2019 & 121/2019 Page 1 of 20 court of sessions, by judgment dated 17.12.2018 an...
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement vs.state Bank of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : February 25, 2019/ March 27, 2019 Decided on : April 02, 2019 + CRL.A. 143/2018 & Crl.M.A. 2262/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus AXIS BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shri Singh, Advocate with Mr. Pradyumna Sharma, Ms. Maneka Khanna & Ms. Sayali Kadu, Advocates for R-1. CRL.A. 210/2018 & Crl.M.A. 3233/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for R-1. + Crl. Appeal No.143/2018 & others Page 1 of 105 + CRL.A. 623/2018 & Crl.M.A. 10886-87/2018, 48245/2018 DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. vers...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.ajit Soni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 04.2019 CRL.REV.P. 484/2017 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) versus AJIT SONI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with Tej Ram For the Respondent: Ms. Jasvinder Kaur and Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. State has filed this revision impugning order dated 07.12.2016 whereby the respondent has been discharged of the offence under Section 376 of the IPC.2. FIR was registered consequent to the directions being issued under Section 156 (3) Cr. P.C. on a complaint filed by the prosecutrix/respondent.3. The allegations in the FIR are that prosecutrix was known to the respondent/accused. Prosecutrix had kept a gold chain with the respondent/accused who is a jeweller. It is contended that her husband had died in the year 2005 and in 2006 she h...
Channel Vas Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~12 & 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 189/2019 CHANNEL VAS SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD. ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with briefing counsel. versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED Through: Mr. Sameer Agarwal, Advocate .....Respondent ARB.P. 190/2019 CHANNEL VAS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with briefing counsel versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED Through: Mr. Sameer Agarwal, Advocate. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER0204.2019 * + + SANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The facts of both the petitions are similar and a common question of law arises and therefore both the petitions are being decided by a common order. ARB.P. 189/2019 & ARB.P. 190/2019 Page 1 of 10 2.... Petitioner company is engaged principally in the business of providing certain software and related services to telecom companies. Respondent is a telecommunication company engaged in operating cellular mobile s...
Union of India vs.punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : February 25, 2019/ March 27, 2019 Decided on : April 02, 2019 + CRL.A. 143/2018 & Crl.M.A. 2262/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus AXIS BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shri Singh, Advocate with Mr. Pradyumna Sharma, Ms. Maneka Khanna & Ms. Sayali Kadu, Advocates for R-1. CRL.A. 210/2018 & Crl.M.A. 3233/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for R-1. + Crl. Appeal No.143/2018 & others Page 1 of 105 + CRL.A. 623/2018 & Crl.M.A. 10886-87/2018, 48245/2018 DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. vers...
Narender Vashishta & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 02, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2164/2017 NARENDER VASHISHTA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nisha Narayan, Advocate Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 6981/2019 (Early hearing) By way of this application early hearing of the main petition is sought by petitioner. Upon hearing, the date of 3rd May, 2019 stands cancelled and the hearing of the main petition is preponed for today. The application is accordingly disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2164/2017 In view of the order passed in Crl.M.A. 6981/2019 the date of 3rd May, 2019 stands cancelled and the hearing of the petition is preponed for today. Crl.M.C. 2164/2019 Page 1 of 3 Quashing of FIR No.162/2014, under Sections 336/427/509/506/323 of IPC, regi...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »