Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uttam Utkarsh and Anr. Vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1556/2019 UTTAM UTKARSH AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Saini and Mr. Rajiv Diwan, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for University of Delhi Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Tarun Verma and Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advs. for the MCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. Mr. Saini, at the outset submits that the petitioner no.2 is not JUDGMENT (ORAL) pressing this writ petition any further.2. Accordingly, this order shall be limited to petitioner no.1 (who shall, therefore, be referred to hereinafter as the petitioner).3. This writ petition deals with the mark sheet of the petitioner in the Third Provisional Part-II MBBS-2018 Examination, conducted by the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, specifically the marks awarded to the petitioner with respect to Paper 1 in the W.P.(C) 1556/2019 Pa...
Mohd. Shakib & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 02, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1216/2019 MOHD. SHAKIB & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS Through: Dr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public .....Respondents Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Praveen Kumar.... RESPONDENTS No.2, 3 and 4 are in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.4765/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1216/2019 Quashing of FIR No.227/2018, under Sections 324/452/427/ 380/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Roop Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of... RESPONDENTS No.2, 3 and 4s affidavits of 13th February, 2019 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- CRL.M.C. 1216/2019 Page 1 of 3 State submits that respondent No.2, 3 and 4 present in the Court, are the comp...
Fateh Singh & Ors vs.the State (Govt of Nct Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~23 & 24 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 53/2019 Decided on:2. d April, 2019 DAYA RAM Through: Mr. R.K. Tarun, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Sharma, Adv. & Mr. Shubham Prajapati, Advocates versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. + CRL.A. 121/2019 FATEH SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. M. Naushad, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have been held guilty and convicted and sentenced in case arising out of first information report (FIR) No.168/2012 of Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur for offences under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Crl. Appeal No.53/2019 & 121/2019 Page 1 of 20 court of sessions, by judgment dated 17.12.2018 an...
Directorate of Enforcement vs.punjab National Bank & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : February 25, 2019/ March 27, 2019 Decided on : April 02, 2019 + CRL.A. 143/2018 & Crl.M.A. 2262/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus AXIS BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shri Singh, Advocate with Mr. Pradyumna Sharma, Ms. Maneka Khanna & Ms. Sayali Kadu, Advocates for R-1. CRL.A. 210/2018 & Crl.M.A. 3233/2018 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for R-1. + Crl. Appeal No.143/2018 & others Page 1 of 105 + CRL.A. 623/2018 & Crl.M.A. 10886-87/2018, 48245/2018 DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mohammed Faraz & Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. vers...
Poonam Chaurasia vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1834/2019 & CM Nos. 8571/2019, 14538/2019 Mr. Rajiv Dewan, Adv. ........ Petitioner POONAM CHAURASIA Through: versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for University of Delhi Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Tarun Verma and Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advs. for the MCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. This writ petition deals with the mark sheet of the petitioner in the Third Provisional Part-II MBBS-2018 Examination, conducted by the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, specifically the marks awarded to the petitioner with respect to Paper 1 in the Examination, i.e. the Medicine paper. The marks awarded to the petitioner, in the Medicine paper, in the aforestated examination, may be set out in a tabular form thus: W.P.(C) 1834/2019 Page 1 of 9 2. Regulation 12(4)(d) of the Medical Council of India, ...
Ifci Ltd. Vs.state Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~9. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:02. 04.2019 % W.P.(C) 6742/2016 IFCI LTD. Through: Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, Sr. Adv. and ........ Petitioner with Mr. Nitin Dahiya Mr.Kaustubh Singh, Advs. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Viney Kumar, Adv. with Mr.H.K.Meena, DGM and Ms.Surbhi, AM for IDBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner IFCI Ltd. (IFCI) has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 21.07.2015, passed by the learned Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (DRAT) in Appeal No.441/2014, in Appeal No.56/2011 (Delhi-I). The scope of the dispute before us is with regard to the distribution of the liquidated amount released upon sale of the asset of the debtor. The dispute is between three financial institutions/ banks, namely IFCI, SBI Ltd. (SBI) and IDBI Ltd. (IDBI).2. The SBI initiated ...
C K P vs.m P
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:2. d April, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 190/2018 C K P M P Through: Ms. Shilpa G. Mittal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Ms. Anjani Kumar and Mr. Abhishek ..... Respondent Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) MAT.APP.(F.C.) 190/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 31738/2018 (for stay), 31740/2018 (for delay) 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 16.5.2018 passed by the Family Court on an application filed by the appellant herein for conducting a DNA test on the child. This application has been rejected by the Family Court. The order passed by the Family Court reads as under:-"Present:... Petitioner with Ld. counsel Sh. R.K. Bacchan. Respondent with Ld. counsel Sh. Anjani Kumar. Replication filed. Copy furnished. Today, petitioner has handed over a sum of Rs. 1,000/- in cash to the respondent towards travelling expense. MAT APP (FC)190/201...
D K Das vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"02.04.2019 D K DAS + W.P.(C) 3209/2019 & C.M. Nos.14733-14734/2019 Through: Mr.Asish Nischal, Adv. UNION OF INDIA versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arun Bharwaj, CGSC with Mr.Prateek Rai, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the order dated 04.12.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) dismissing OA No.100/3667/2015, preferred by the petitioner to challenge the order of penalty passed against him by the respondent. The petitioner also assails the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him and the consequent penalty imposed on him.2. The petitioner joined the service of the CPWD as a Junior Engineer. He was promoted to the post of Assistant Engineer. At that stage, a charge-sheet was issued against him on 04.04.2003 ...
Tata Sky Limited vs.national Internet Exchange of India (Nixi) and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d April, 2019 CS(COMM) 1202/2016, IA No.10758/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.13041/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) TATA SKY LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Anurag Sahay, Ms. Mallika Bhatia, Mr. Raghav Wadhwa & Mr. Siddhant Kumar Singh, Advs. Versus * % + NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA (NIXI) AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Vakul Sharma, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Adv. for D-2.1. The plaintiff instituted this suit for (a) permanent injunction to restrain the defendant no.3 Vishwanath Suchirla from passing off the trade name and trade mark TATA SKY of the plaintiff as his own, whether as part of a trade mark, trade name, corporate name, domain name etc.; (b) permanent injunction restraining defendant no.1 National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI) and defendant no.2 GoDaddy Operating Company, LLC from registering or continuing with existing regis...
Rahul Gadodia vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 02, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1726/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6947/2019 RAHUL GADODIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K.Gahlaut, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Dr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public .....Respondents Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Ramakant. Mr.Maneesh Kumar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.6946/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1726/2019 Quashing of FIR No.143/2007, under Sections 498-A/34 of IPC, registered at police station Lahori Gate, Delhi is sought on the basis of respondent No.2s affidavit of 29th March, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Ramakant on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1726/2019 Page 1 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »