Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sks Power Generation (Chhattisgarh) Ltd vs.isc Projects Private Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 132/2019 SKS POWER GENERATION (CHHATTISGARH) LTD Date of Decision :3. d April, 2019 Through: Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr.Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr.Atul Shanker Mathur, Ms.Priya Singh, Ms.Deepabali Datta, Mr.Aishwary Vikram and Mr.Soham Kumar, Advs. versus ISC PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sameer Parekh, Ms.Smita Bhargava, Ms.Aishwarya Dash and Mr.Sarthak Gaur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA46842019(delay of 33 days in re-filing the petition) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 11.06.2018 and the Additional Award dated 08.10.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to three contracts, namely Services, Supply and O.M.P. (COMM) 132/2019 Page 1 Coord...
Tushar Arora vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 04.2019 BAIL APPLN. 786/2019 TUSHAR ARORA versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Ms.Archana Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Rajender, P.S.Anand Vihar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.2. Status report is filed. Same is taken on record.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.90/2019 under Sections 379/356/4IPC P.S. Anand Vihar.3. The allegation of the complainant is that he is a street vendor and on the date of the incident at about 4.45 PM he was vending food articles in the service lane of the market. His phone rang and when he took out the phone to answer the same, two boys came on a motorcycle and one of the boys who was pillion rider snatched his BAIL APPLN.786/2019 Page 1 of 3 mobile phone. Thereafter the c...
Uttrakhand Transport Corporation vs.jyoti Sardana & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 04.2019 % MAC.APP. 920/2017 and CM APPL. 37864/2017 UTTRAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate. versus JYOTI SARDANA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate for R-1, R-2, R-3 & R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) By the instant appeal, the appellant-the owner of bus bearing 1. registration no.UK-07-PA-1358, in short, the offending vehicle, seeks to assail the judgment-Award dated 29.07.2017 passed by MACT (N/W), whereunder, the offending vehicle was held to be driven rashly and negligently resulting into the death of Mohan Kumar Sardana, in short the deceased. The compensation came to be awarded to the respondent nos.1 MAC.APP. 920/2017 Page 1 of 6 to 5, who are his widow, children and the parents. The appellant assails the impugned judgment-Award, on two counts. Firstly, on the ground that the evidence and the other material on...
Sh. Anand Prakash Gupta vs.state of n.c.t of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 03, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1740/2019 SH. ANAND PRAKASH GUPTA Through: In person versus STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI & ANR .....Petitioner .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Niraj Kumar. Mr. Ishwar Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.7000/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1740/2019 Quashing of FIR No.49/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Pandav Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of respondent No.2s affidavit of 1st October, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Niraj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1740/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, pre...
Manish Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 109/2019 & C.M. Nos.618/2019, 11454/2019, 11597/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 Judgment reserved on:16. 04.2019 HIMANSHU KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi & Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocates with Mr.Parmatma Singh, Mr.Madhur Jain, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG and Ms.Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Shailesh Madiyal & Mr. Debasish Raut, Advs R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-4. + W.P.(C) 862/2019 & CM APPL. 3903-3905/2019 HAARIS RASHEED & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankur Khandelwal, Mr.Utkarsh Sharma, Mr.Gowrang, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG and Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Mr.Shailesh Madiyal, Mr.Debasish Raut, Advs for R-1,2 & 3. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-4. W.P.(C.) Nos.109/2019, 862/2019, 864/2019 & 869/2019 ...
Louis Vuitton Malletier vs.iqbal Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13th March 2019 Pronounced on:3. d April 2019 CS(COMM) 607/2018 LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Udita Patro & Mr. Nischay Mall and Mr.Dhruv Anand, Advocate. versus IQBAL SINGH AND ORS Through:None. ..... Defendants CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present suit filed by the Plaintiff is for permanent injunction restraining infringement of its trademark, passing off, dilution, rendition of accounts of profits, damages and delivery up. The suit was originally filed as a regular suit and was registered as a commercial suit vide order dated 7th February 2018. Proceedings in the suit.2. On 2nd December 2011, the summons in the suit were directed to be issued and also an ex-parte ad interim injunction was granted in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant. On service of summons, Defendants appeared and filed written statement on 30th September CS(COMM) 607/20...
Ramesh Kumar Goel & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:03. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 2409/2015 MANOJ KUMAR AND ANR. Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5767/2015 AND :Mr Puneet Taneja, Ms Laxmi Kumari, Advocates. :Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs K.K. Kiran, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr M.S. Akhter, Advocates for R-2/ADM/LAC/ GNCTD. Mr Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate with Mr Shushant Tripathi, ALO of R-4/DMRC. Ms Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. RAMESH KUMAR GOEL & ORS. Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners :Mr Puneet Taneja, Ms Laxmi Kumari, Advocates. W.P.(C) Nos. 2409/2015 & Other connected matters Page 1 of 15 For the... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5779/20Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs K.K. Kiran, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr M.S. Akhter, Advocates for ...
Jasmeet Singh vs.state and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 03, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1192/2019 JASMEET SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipul Srivastava, Advocate Versus STATE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Dr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Mr. Samarth Bhutani and Mr. Siddharth Bansal, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.4651/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1192/2019 Quashing of FIR No.199/2015, under Sections 323/354A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Respondent No.2s affidavit of 25th February, 2019 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the CRL.M.C. 1192/2019 Pag...
Jamia Hamdard (Deemed University) vs.jamia Hamdard Employees Union
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d April, 2019. CS(OS) 278/2016 & IA No.6914/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC). JAMIA HAMDARD (DEEMED UNIVERSITY) ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Ekta K. Sikri and Ms. Advaita Sharma, Advs. Versus JAMIA HAMDARD EMPLOYEES UNION ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh, Ms Akanksha Singh and Mr. Avanish Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The plaintiff has instituted this suit against Jamia Hamdard Employees 1. Union and against Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, New Delhi, pleading (i) that the plaintiff is a deemed University recognized under the University Grants Commission (UGC) Act, 1956; (ii) that the defendant no.1 is a registered Trade Union which has been indulging in the acts of dharnas and violence against the plaintiff University; (iii) that the plaintiff University does not recognize the defendant no.1 Union and the said issue is pending adjudication before the Regist...
Renu Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5740/2018 & CMs 22265/2018 and 26245/2018 40 + RENU GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Mr Prateek Kohli and Ms Vishnushree Dalmia, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Mishra and Ms. Abha Malhotra, Advocates for DDA. Mr. P.S. Singh, Advocate with Mr. Annu Singh and Mr. Sameer, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Ms. Abha Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Varma, Senior Standing Counsel of DDA for Respondent No.3. Ms Padma Priya and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates for NHAI/R-2. Mr Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for R-4 with Mr Rajneesh Bhaskar and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER0204.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge in this petition is to a notification dated 15th May, 2017 issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India under Section 3-A (1) of the National Highw...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »