Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Il & Fs Financial Services Ltd. Vs.harangi Agro-Farms Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~3/* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1169/2016, IA No.7767/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.7768/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3765/2019 (u/S151CPC) IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Plaintiff + + Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advs. Versus HARANGI AGRO-FARMS PVT. LTD & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Uttam Datt & Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Advs. AND CS(OS) 593/2009, IA No.4144/2009 (u/O XXXVIII R-5 CPC), IA No.7250/2011 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.5545/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3767/2019 (u/S151CPC) IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advs. Versus B. RAMALINGA RAJU & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Uttam Datt & Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Advs. AND CS(OS) 594/2009, IA No.4148/2009 (u/O XXXVIII R-5 CPC), IA No.7251/2011 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.5540/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3763/2019 (u/S1...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (Bsnl) vs.maharashtra Knowledge Corporation L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:4. 4.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 83/2018 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD (BSNL) Through Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus MAHARASHTRA KNOWLEDGE CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Abhinav Mukerji and Mr. Siddharth Garg, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): Preface 1. This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 1996 Act) qua the award dated 9.10.2017.2. The challenge in the award is restricted to claim No.III whereby the petitioners counterclaim in the sum of Rs.2.7 crores was disallowed. 2.1 For the purposes of this judgment, I would be referring to the petitioner as BSNL and the respondent as MKCL. Collectively BSNL and MKCL will be referred to as parties unless the context requires them to be mentioned separately.3. It may be relevant to note that MKCL was the original claimant before the learned Arbitrator wh...
Praveen Kapila vs.navin Soi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 62/2019 Date of Decision:-"03.04.2019 PRAVEEN KAPILA ..... Appellant Through Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. versus NAVIN SOI & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms.Sonia A.Menon, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J(ORAL) CAV.346/2019 Counsel for the respondents/caveators enters appearance. The caveats stand discharged. C.M. No.15533/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. No.15534/2019 By this application, the applicant seeks condonation of three days delay in filing the present appeal. Counsel for the respondents fairly does not oppose the application. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of three days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS)62/2019 Page 1 of 5 FAO(OS) 62/2019 & C.M. No.15532/2019 1. The appellant has preferred the present appeal to assail the judgment dated 14.02.2019 pass...
Ashok Kumar Gupta vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)& Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 03, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1759/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7055/2019 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Richa Singh & Mr. Alok Dev, Advocates. Versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR.....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector Dharmendra. Mr. Shaji Sebastian & Mr.Vivek Bharadwaj, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.64/2015, under Sections 354-A/506/509 of IPC, registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 20th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has...
Union of India and Anr vs.anjani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 7611/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Mrinalini Sen with Ms.Kritika Gupta, Advs. ANJANI versus Through Mr.Deepak Verma, Adv ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under ArticleConstitution of India assails an order dated 07.12.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (Tribunal), allowing O.A.No.1439/2015 filed by the respondent. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has directed the petitioners to fix the respondents pay in the scale of Rs.5500-9000/- w.e.f. 01.01.2003 and in PB2with Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- w.e.f. 01.01.2006.2. The respondent joined the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) as a Junior Hindi Translator w.e.f. 24.10.2003 when she was placed in the scale of Rs.4500-7000/-, which was subsequently increased t...
Ashok Kumar Pasi vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 04.2019 CRL.REV.P. 389/2019 ASHOK KUMAR PASI versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. L.K. Passi with Mr. N.M. Rajesh, Advocates. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. ASI Ashok Kumar, PS Timar Pur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.6995/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.REV.P. 389/2019 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 28.02.2019, whereby, interim maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per month has been granted to the respondent.2.... Petitioner has been working as a Manager in Canara Bank and CRL.REV.P. 389/2019 Page 1 of 3 admittedly has a monthly income of Rs.60,000/-.3. Respondent, in the petition, filed before the Trial Court, has contended that though she is registered as an advocate, she is not practicing and is p...
Rajkumar @ Raju & Anr vs.the State (Govt of Nct) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"3rd April, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 635/2016 RAJKUMAR @ RAJU & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Islam Khan, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Satish Chand PS Pul Prahlad Pur. Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Adv. for R- 2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are facing trial as accused in criminal case arising out of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted on conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.290/2010 of police station Pul Prahalad Pur. It appears that on the basis of evidence that was gathered during investigation, the petitioners have been put on trial on the charge for offences under Sections 323/324/452 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the second and third respondents herein being the victims (...
Continental Construction Ltd. Vs.northern Eastern Railway
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d April, 2019 + CS (COMM) 163/2017 CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Pavan Upadhyay, Ms. Meenakshi Rawat and Mr. Rajeev Chhetri, Advocates. (M:9891675255) versus NORTHERN EASTERN RAILWAY Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Defendant Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. None has appeared for the Defendant, despite service.2. The present objections under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 have been filed challenging the award communicated vide letter dated 23rd January, 2008 passed by the Ld. Arbitral Tribunal, consisting of two Arbitrators, both of whom are technical Arbitrators.3. The Plaintiff - Continental Construction Ltd. (hereinafter Contractor) was awarded a contract for construction of sub-structure, including well foundation and pre-stressed concrete box girder for road super structure with contractors own design on 15th October, 1992. The work...
Manoj Kumar and Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:03. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 2409/2015 MANOJ KUMAR AND ANR. Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5767/2015 AND :Mr Puneet Taneja, Ms Laxmi Kumari, Advocates. :Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs K.K. Kiran, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr M.S. Akhter, Advocates for R-2/ADM/LAC/ GNCTD. Mr Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate with Mr Shushant Tripathi, ALO of R-4/DMRC. Ms Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. RAMESH KUMAR GOEL & ORS. Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners :Mr Puneet Taneja, Ms Laxmi Kumari, Advocates. W.P.(C) Nos. 2409/2015 & Other connected matters Page 1 of 15 For the... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5779/20Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs K.K. Kiran, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr M.S. Akhter, Advocates for ...
Pankaj Kumar Singh vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 03, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1746/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7014/2019 PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Tandan, Ms. Hernisha Tandan, Advocates. Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.502/2015, under Sections 498-A/506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Okhla, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 21st January, 2019 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Praveen Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, subm...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »