Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Il & Fs Financial Services Ltd. & Anr. Vs.b. Ramalinga Raju & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~3/* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1169/2016, IA No.7767/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.7768/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3765/2019 (u/S151CPC) IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Plaintiff + + Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advs. Versus HARANGI AGRO-FARMS PVT. LTD & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Uttam Datt & Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Advs. AND CS(OS) 593/2009, IA No.4144/2009 (u/O XXXVIII R-5 CPC), IA No.7250/2011 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.5545/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3767/2019 (u/S151CPC) IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advs. Versus B. RAMALINGA RAJU & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Uttam Datt & Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Advs. AND CS(OS) 594/2009, IA No.4148/2009 (u/O XXXVIII R-5 CPC), IA No.7251/2011 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.5540/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3763/2019 (u/S1...
Saga Lifestyle Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.bang & Olufsen a/S & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h April, 2019. CS(COMM) 811/2016 SAGA LIFESTYLE PVT LTD & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ravjyot Singh with Ms. Hiba & Mr. Aman Tajta, Advs. Versus BANG & OLUFSEN A/S & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nishant Menon, Ms. Kavita Sarin & Mr. Deepesh, Advs. for D-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW OA No.75/2018 (of D-1 for setting aside of order dated 21.05.2018) & IA92912018 (for condonation of 7 days delay in filing thereof) 1. The defendant no.1 has preferred this Chamber Appeal against the order dated 21st May, 2018 of the Joint Registrar of dismissal of IA No.848/2017 filed by the defendant no.1 under Order I Rule 10 (2) CPC for deletion from the array of defendants.2. Ms. Hiba, Advocate for the plaintiffs states that Mr. Ravjyot Singh Advocate is in Tis Hazari Courts and has not reached till now and seeks a pass over.3. Anyone seeing the Cause List of this Court w...
Bijender Singh Meena vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 02.2019 Pronounced on:04. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 10217/2016 BIJENDER SINGH MEENA Through: Mr. Raj Singh Phogat, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Prateek K. Chadha, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Vinay Sabharwal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.03.2016 by which the respondents has rejected the representation of the petitioner to grant the benefits and arrears of pay fixation of selection grade pay of 3100 w.e.f. 07.06.1996 and pay revision based on that. He further seeks upgradation as per the approval of the Board of Directors in their resolution No.68.2.4 & 65.2.4 dated 12.03.2014. He also seeks benefits of TBPS (Time Bound Promotional Scale) as given to the other similarly placed employees of the IPGCL with financial benefits as a consequences of W.P.(C) 10217/2016 Page 1...
M/S Clues Network Pvt Ltd vs.m/s L’oreal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2019 & CM APPL. 1287/2019 (stay) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate versus with Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. C.A.Brijesh, Mr. Dhruv Grover & Ms. Anmol Kaur Nayar, Advocates Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal & Ms. Harshita Varma, Advocates ..... Respondent M/S CLUES NETWORK PVT LTD M/S LOREAL + M/S CLUES NETWROK PVT LTD M/S SKULLCANDY INC CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA versus % Dr.S.Muralidhar, J.ORDER0404.2019 RFA(OS)(COMM) 5/2019 & CM Appl.No.4866/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. C.A.Brijesh, Mr. Dhruv Grover & Ms. Anmol Kaur Nayar, Advocates ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal & Ms. Harshita Varma, Advocates 1. These two appeals arise out of a common set of facts, involve the same Appellant and give rise to the same questions of law and are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment. RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2019 & 5/2019 Page ...
s.n Sharma vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 04, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1791/2019 & Crl.M.As. 7178-79/2019 S.N SHARMA Through: Mr. Tarun Kumar Bedi & Mr. S.N. .....Petitioner Versus Sharma, Advocates STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Madan Mohan Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.444/2015, under Sections 354/354A/509 of IPC, registered at Police Station Ranhola, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 17th May, 2017 and affidavit of 28th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been ident...
State vs.mahender Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. 04.2019 CRL.L.P. 632/2018 & CRL. M.A. 33303/2018 STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Janak Singh, PS Okhla Industrial Area. versus MAHENDER PAL Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % CRL. M.A. 33303/2018 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL. L.P. 632/2018 1. By this petition under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter as Cr.P.C), the petitioner/State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 23.07.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court (POCSO), South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi whereby the accused/respondent was acquitted of the charges punishable under Section 354-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter as IPC) & Section 8 of` POCSO Act in FIR CRL.L.P. 632/2018 Page 1 of 8 No.210/2013 registered at Police Station Okh...
Bal Raj Parashar vs.union Academy Senior Secondary School and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI2+ BAL RAJ PARASHAR ..... Appellant LPA5022018 Through: Mr. R.K. Saini with Mr M.N. Dudeja, Advocates. versus UNION ACADEMY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate for R-3 and 4. Mr T.R. Verma, OSD (Zone-26), DOE, GNCTD. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER0404.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 4th December, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Appellants writ petition being W.P.(C) No.2272/2012 as well as the order dated 8th May, 2018 whereby the Review Petition No.194/2018 filed by the Appellant seeking review of the judgment dated 4th December, 2017 was dismissed.2. The background facts are that by an advertisement published on 20th February, 2008, the Respondent No.1 school invited applications for the post of librarian. The Respondent No.1 is an aided school and is governed by the Recruitment Rules (RR...
Il & Fs Financial Services Ltd. & Anr vs.b. Ramalinga Raju & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~3/* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1169/2016, IA No.7767/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.7768/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3765/2019 (u/S151CPC) IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Plaintiff + + Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advs. Versus HARANGI AGRO-FARMS PVT. LTD & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Uttam Datt & Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Advs. AND CS(OS) 593/2009, IA No.4144/2009 (u/O XXXVIII R-5 CPC), IA No.7250/2011 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.5545/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3767/2019 (u/S151CPC) IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advs. Versus B. RAMALINGA RAJU & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Uttam Datt & Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Advs. AND CS(OS) 594/2009, IA No.4148/2009 (u/O XXXVIII R-5 CPC), IA No.7251/2011 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC), IA No.5540/2013 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) & IA No.3763/2019 (u/S1...
State of Nct of Delhi vs.ram Lakhan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision 4th April, 2019 CRL.LP. 232/2018 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. ....Petitioner Versus RAM LAKHAN Through: None. ....Respondent SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J (ORAL) 1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred as 'Cr.P.C.'), the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 18.12.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01/Judge Special Court, POCSO Act, Shahdara District, Karkardooma, Delhi in Case FIR No.271/2013 under Sections 354A/354/506/341 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and Section 8 of POCSO Act registered at Police Station - M. S. Park, Delhi whereby the respondent was acquitted of the charged offences.2. The case of the prosecution in a nutshell is that on 23.09.2013, mother of the victim/child came to the police station and made a written complaint against the r...
Sonu vs.the State (Gnct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 04.2019 CRL.REV.P. 73/2017 SONU versus THE STATE (GNCT) DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner :... Petitioner in person. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Jitender Joshi, PS Subzi Mandi. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 04.01.2017, whereby, the appeal of the petitioner, impugning judgment of conviction dated 09.06.2016 and order on sentence dated 08.07.2016 has been dismissed.2.... Petitioner had been convicted of the offence under Section 452/325/341 IPC and sentenced by the Trial Court to undergo imprisonment of 2 years with fine of Rs.5,000/- each for the offence under SectionsIPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 341 IPC and in default of CRL.REV.P.73/2017 Page 1 of 4 payment of fine t...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »