Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shamshad @ Murappan & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h February, 2019 Decided on:4. h April, 2019 CRL.A. 990/2018 SHAMSHAD @ MURAPPAN & ORS. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Avinash Nandan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Shamshad @ Murappan, Akram and Shahrukh @ Sharup Khan challenge the impugned judgment dated 5th July, 2018 convicting them for the offence punishable under Sections 304 Part-II and 34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 7th July, 2018 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period six months for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part-II/34 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellants have been convicted on the statement of the sole eye- witn...
M/S Clues Netwrok Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Skullcandy Inc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2019 & CM APPL. 1287/2019 (stay) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate versus with Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. C.A.Brijesh, Mr. Dhruv Grover & Ms. Anmol Kaur Nayar, Advocates Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal & Ms. Harshita Varma, Advocates ..... Respondent M/S CLUES NETWORK PVT LTD M/S LOREAL + M/S CLUES NETWROK PVT LTD M/S SKULLCANDY INC CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA versus % Dr.S.Muralidhar, J.ORDER0404.2019 RFA(OS)(COMM) 5/2019 & CM Appl.No.4866/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. C.A.Brijesh, Mr. Dhruv Grover & Ms. Anmol Kaur Nayar, Advocates ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal & Ms. Harshita Varma, Advocates 1. These two appeals arise out of a common set of facts, involve the same Appellant and give rise to the same questions of law and are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment. RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2019 & 5/2019 Page ...
Sh. Bhupender @ Bhuri & Ors vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 04, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1773/2019 SH. BHUPENDER @ BHURI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naresh Chandra Dwivedi, versus Advocate. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor with SI Ashish Kumar. Mr. Ashok, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.7133/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1773/2019 Quashing of FIR No.1033/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Gokulpuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of respondent No.2s affidavit of 25th March, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Ashish Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1773/2...
Deepa Arya vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 04.2019 CRL.M.C. 1692/2018 DEEPA ARYA versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. Prashant Sharma, Mr. Prateek Gupta, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander, Advs. along with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. K.G. Tyagi, ACP, Mr. Arvind Kumr, ACP Inspr. Mukesh Kumar and Inspr. Bhushan Azad, Inspr. Anil Kumar, Inspr. Lokesh Sharma, Inspr. Pramod Ms. Neela Gohkhale with Mr. Vipin Anand, Mr. Ham Paridi, Mr. Suresh Prasad and Ms. Sliradda Agrawal, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.49067/2018 (by Respondent No.2 for recall of order dated 10.04.2018) Reply to the application has been filed by the petitioner. The 1. CRL.M.C. 1692/2018 Page 1 of...
Maj. (Retd.) Surendra Kumar Hooda vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~1 to 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h April, 2019 + BAIL APPLN. 903/2018 and Crl. M.A74132018 SUNIL GANDHI ........ Petitioner + STATE Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Kohli, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Kushal Mangal, Mr. Bhavit Yadav and Ms. Dhristi Ahluwalia, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with ACP K. Ramesh, Insp. Vinod Gandhi and SI Harpal Madan Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir and Mr. Laksh Khanna, Advocate complainant Mahinder Kr. Soni Mr. complainant / Spirewoods Resident Assn. Sanjay Abbot, Advocate for for Mr. Satya Prakash Yadav, Advocate for the complainant Vishvendra BAIL APPLN. 2458/2018 and Crl. M (Bail) 1643/2018 and Crl. M.A. 34478/2018 MAJ.(RETD.) SURENDRA KUMAR HOODA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Madhav Khurana and Mr. Varun Singh Thapa, Advocate versus Bail Appln. 903-18, 2458-18, 2459-18, 2460-18, 905-18 & 913-18 Page 1 of 19 + STATE .....
Om Prakash vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
#6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:4. h April, 2019 CRL. A. 815/2017 OM PRAKASH STATE versus ..... Appellant .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms. Inderjeet Sidu, (DHCLSC), Advocate along with appellant from J.C. :Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. Inspector Bineet Kr. Pandey, P.S. Gokulpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (OPEN COURT) 1. The present appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr.PC), assails the judgment and order of conviction dated 21st October, 2016 and Order on sentence dated 22nd October, 2016, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-01 (North-East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.44914/2016, arising out of FIR No.197/2012, registered under Sections CRL. A. 815/2017 Page 1 of 19 376/354/506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (he...
Sadhna Aggarwal vs.rakesh Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 181/2019 & IA No.4720/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) SADHNA AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Suryakant Singla with ..... Plaintiff Ms. Rimjhim Naudiyal, Advs.1. Through: None. versus RAKESH AGGARWAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % On 1st April, 2019, when the suit first came up before this Court, the ORDER0404.2019 ..... Defendant following order was passed.: 3. The plaintiff has sued her husband for cancellation of the partition deed dated 1st June, 2016 executed by the plaintiff and her husband with respect to an immovable property owned by both of them.4. The only ground for cancellation is that the husband of the plaintiff has not paid to the plaintiff the owelty which he had agreed to pay under the partition deed. I have enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, under 5. which law the plaintiff is entitled to the said relief of cancellation. The counsel for the plaintiff invites attention to Section 31 6. of the Specific ...
Sunil Gandhi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~1 to 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h April, 2019 + BAIL APPLN. 903/2018 and Crl. M.A74132018 SUNIL GANDHI ........ Petitioner + STATE Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Kohli, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Kushal Mangal, Mr. Bhavit Yadav and Ms. Dhristi Ahluwalia, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with ACP K. Ramesh, Insp. Vinod Gandhi and SI Harpal Madan Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir and Mr. Laksh Khanna, Advocate complainant Mahinder Kr. Soni Mr. complainant / Spirewoods Resident Assn. Sanjay Abbot, Advocate for for Mr. Satya Prakash Yadav, Advocate for the complainant Vishvendra BAIL APPLN. 2458/2018 and Crl. M (Bail) 1643/2018 and Crl. M.A. 34478/2018 MAJ.(RETD.) SURENDRA KUMAR HOODA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Madhav Khurana and Mr. Varun Singh Thapa, Advocate versus Bail Appln. 903-18, 2458-18, 2459-18, 2460-18, 905-18 & 913-18 Page 1 of 19 + STATE .....
Chanchal Chopra vs.subhash Duggal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~OS-4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 122/2017 Date of decision:04. 04.2019 CHANCHAL CHOPRA ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Prosenjeet Banerjee and M.Chand Versus Chopra, Advs. SUBHASH DUGGAL & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr.Anshuman Sood and Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Advs. for D-1 Mr.R.K.Sachdeva, Adv. for D-2 Mr.Akshay Makhija and Ms.Pavitra Kaur, Advs. for D-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.2267/2019 1. This application is filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of written statement of defendant No.1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a preliminary decree of partition in favour of plaintiff and against the defendants thereby partitioning the suit property and declaring the plaintiff to be owner of 1/4th share of the suit property i.e. property situated at E-79, Anand Niketan, New Delhi. Other reliefs are also sought.2. The parties are siblings and the dispute pertains to the division of the said aforenoted property ...
Nevil Vishnubhai Patel vs.medical Council of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2173/2019 NEVIL VISHNUBHAI PATEL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr T. Sundar Ramanathan, Mr Jay Shah and Ms Kumudavalli S., Advocates. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS versus Kaur Through: Mr T. Singhdev, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar and Ms Amandeep Ahuja, Advocates for R-1/MCI. Mr Praveen Khattar, Advocate for R-2/DMC with Mr L. D. S. Uppal, Assistant Secretary, DMC. Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for Mr Kirtiman Singh, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0404.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.15750/2019 1. This is an application filed by the petitioner for correctly reflecting his name as Nevil Vishnubhai Patel. The cause title is rectified to reflect the same.2. The application is disposed of. W.P. (C) 2173/2019 Page 1 of 6 CM No.10232/2019 3. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2173/2019 & CM No.10231/2019 4. Issue notice. The learned counsel appearing ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »