Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Zahid Hussain & Ors vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 05, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1811/2019 ZAHID HUSSAIN & ORS Through: Mr.N.K.Vatsal, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State- respondent with SI Manish Tyagi Mr. Ashwini Kumar and Mr. Arup Sinha, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.7264/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1811/2019 Quashing of FIR No.857/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Jamia Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 2nd August, 2018 (Annexure P-2 colly). Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Manish Tyagi on the basis of ident...
Anil & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 05, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1816/2019 & Crl.M.A.7277/2019 ANIL & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Naina Bajaj, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Deepak Panwar. Mr. M.R. Singh Sisodia & Mr. Akrar M. Khan, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.367/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 27th September, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Deepak Panwar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1816/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the...
Jagraj Singh Alias Rajan Bhaiya vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 353/2003 IN THE MATTER OF: Reserved on:13. 02.2019 Date of decision:05. 04.2019 JAGRAJ SINGH alias RAJAN BHAIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikram Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State. ..... Respondent STATE OF DELHI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. A limited question that has come up for consideration in the present appeal, arising from Sessions Case No.185/2001, in FIR No.301/2000, PS Patel Nagar, is as to whether the conviction of the appellant vide impugned judgment dated 21.4.2003, under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated 22.4.2003, sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three years, is liable to be upheld or he deserves to be held guilty for the commi...
National Highways Authority of India vs.sunway Construction Sdn Bhd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~25. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 04.2019 FAO(OS) 65/2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Appellant Through: Dr. Maurya Vijay Chandra, Adv. versus SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD Through: Dr. Amit George with Mr. Rishabh Dheer, Mr. Amol Acharya and Mr. V.M.Vishnu, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.16091/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CAV No.361/2019 Counsel for the respondent caveator has appeared. The caveat stands discharged accordingly. FAO(OS) 65/2019 & C.M. No.16092/2019 1. Issue notice. Dr. Amit George accepts notice. We have heard the FAO(OS) 65/2019 Page 1 of 11 submissions of learned counsels and proceed to dispose of the present appeal preferred by the appellant National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.2. The appellant has...
Delhi Mashakhore Association(regd) vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 8323/2017 & CM Nos. 34241/2017 & 20614/2018 HARISH KUMAR MATLANI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sachin Nahar and Mr V.P. for R- Development, Nahar, Advocates 1/Secretary GNCTD. Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC. and + W.P.(C) 8381/2017 & CM No.34518-19/2017 WITH JAWAHAR LAL BHATEJA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Bhanu Gupta, Advocates for R- 1/GNCTD. W.P.(C) 8323/2017& other connected matters Page 1 of 11 Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC.AND and + W.P.(C) 8500/2017 & CM No.35027-28/2017 M/S CHAUDHARY HIRA SINGH MANDI A BLOCK MASHAKHORE HITKARI SAMITI (REGD)........ Peti...
Sh. Pawan Kumar Saini vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 05, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1819/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7288/2019 SH. SATYENDER TOMAR & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Vashisth, Ms. Rita Rana & Mr. Vishwas Ahuja, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sumit Kumar. + CRL.M.C. 1836/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7334/2019 SH. PAWAN KUMAR SAINI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Vashisth, Ms. Rita Rana & Mr. Vishwas Ahuja, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sumit. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions quashing of cross FIR Nos. 755/2015 under Sections 323/341/354(B)/451/506/5of IPC and FIR Crl.M.C. 1819/2019 & Crl.M.C. 1836/2019 Page 1 of 3 No.754/2015 under Sections 341/354(B)/451/5of IPC both registered at police station Jyoti Nagar, Delhi are sought on the ground that the mis...
J. C. Bamford Excavators Ltd vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~82 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. h April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6103/2018 & CM APPLN. 23703/2018 J.C. BAMFORD EXCAVATORS LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anil Dutt, Mr.Prashant Phillips, Mr.Sudarshan Shekhawat, Ms.Gunjan Hans and Ms.Godhuli Nanda, Advocates 1. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr.Kavindra Gill, Mr.Upendra Sai and Mr.Kamaldeep, Advocates for R-1 and R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGEMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the order dated 09th April, 2018 whereby Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs revoked patent No.251037 and imposed cost of Rs.10,000/- on the petitioner.2. The petitioner applied for grant of a patent in respect of an invention titled Excavating and Loading Machine on 11th May, 2015. The petitioners patent application was published under Section 11A of the Patents Act on 09th January, 2009 and patent No.25103...
Vicky Cashier @ Shamsher Singh vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 642/2019 Judgment delivered on:04. 04.2019 VICKY CASHIER @ SHAMSHER SINGH ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar Adv. For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Reena, P.S.Pachim Vihar. : JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.433/2018, under Section U/S324354/5IPC P.S. Paschim Vihar.2. Allegations of the prosecutrix is that she resides in a jhuggi along with her child and on the date of the incident the co accused Pappu Saansi along with three other boys came on the spot and started teasing and abusing her. It is alleged that the co accused slapped her and when her daughter intervened, he assaulted her with a sharp instrument. BAIL APPLN. 642/2019 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsel for the peti...
Airlines Retired Officers Welfare Association and Ors vs.air India Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 7634/2013 AIRLINES RETIRED OFFICERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma & Mr. Aniteja Sharma, Advocates versus AIR INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra, Adv. with Ms.Chandni Sadana & Mr.Ajay Pratap Singh, Advs. Ms.Meenakshi Kashyap, GM (IR). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby directing the respondent to continue with the medical and free air passage entitlement as per the terms and service conditions prevailing at the time of superannuation and as per the scheme of amalgamation of Indian Airlines and Air India duly approved by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs order dated 23.08.2007. They further seek direction thereby quashing the W.P.(C) 7634/2013 Page 1 of 5 Memorandum No.HPD01/4501 dated 30.09.2013 issued by Air India Ltd., Executive Direc...
Babu Khan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
$~7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"4th April, 2019 + CRL.A. 647/2005 BABU KHAN Through: Mr. ..... Appellant Advocate with appellant person. Gautam Khazanchi, in versus STATE Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP. ..... Respondent SI Nikhil Singh, P.S. New Ashok Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant Babu Khan was prosecuted in the Sessions Case No.133/2002 in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge on the basis of report (chargesheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on the charge for offences punishable under Section 365 and 376 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the said trial also being against a co-accused (Raja @ Shahid). On the basis of evidence which was adduced, the trial court, by its judgment, dated 20.01.2004, held both appellant and the said Raja guilty and convicted them, as charged. By order dated 21.01.2004, rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of Rs...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »