Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Hem Chandra Bhatt & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 05, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1834/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7323/2019 DR. HEM CHANDRA BHATT & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Indrapal Singh. Mr. Rakesh Malviya, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.430/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Madhu Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 22nd January, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 have been added and respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Indrapal Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1834/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respond...
Surender Singh Arya vs.meenu Arya
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2019 CRL.REV.P. 280/2015 & Crl. M.A. 7019/2015 SURENDER SINGH ARYA MEENU ARYA versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Abhimannyu Kampani and Mr. Samarth Teotia, Advs. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Mr. Brahm Kr. Pandey, Advs. with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 26.02.2015 whereby the trial court has accepted the application of the respondent for restoration of the petition; dismissed on 08.10.2012 and restored the same.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent had substantially delayed the proceedings and as such the trial court was constrained to pass a judgment on 08.10.2012 dismissing the petition. CRL.REV.P. 280/2015 Page 1 of 6 3. Learned coun...
Union of India and Ors vs.hriday Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) No.10479/2017 & C.M. No.42904/2017 (for stay) UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr.Amit Mahajan, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus HRIDAY RAM Through Mr.U. Srivastava, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) 1. Mr.Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has taken instructions. The order passed by the Tribunal has been implemented subject to the present writ petition. He has, therefore, pressed the petition.2. We have heard the submissions of learned counsel. The petitioner-Union of India assails the order dated 14.12.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.100/1722/2015. The Tribunal allowed the said Original Application and directed the petitioner herein to regularize the services of the respondent w.e.f. 17.06.2011, i.e., when the post of WP(C) No.10479/2017 Page...
Badam Singh Chauhan and Ors. Vs.agricultural Produce Markting Committe ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 8323/2017 & CM Nos. 34241/2017 & 20614/2018 HARISH KUMAR MATLANI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sachin Nahar and Mr V.P. for R- Development, Nahar, Advocates 1/Secretary GNCTD. Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC. and + W.P.(C) 8381/2017 & CM No.34518-19/2017 WITH JAWAHAR LAL BHATEJA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Bhanu Gupta, Advocates for R- 1/GNCTD. W.P.(C) 8323/2017& other connected matters Page 1 of 11 Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC.AND and + W.P.(C) 8500/2017 & CM No.35027-28/2017 M/S CHAUDHARY HIRA SINGH MANDI A BLOCK MASHAKHORE HITKARI SAMITI (REGD)........ Peti...
Anirudh Tyagi & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 05, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1818/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7284/2019 ANIRUDH TYAGI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Harbir Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Hukam. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.2860/2015, under Sections 3of IPC, registered at Police Station Mehrauli, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 6th February, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by SI Hukam, on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Respondent No.2 present in th...
Subheg Singh & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~R-50 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:5. h April, 2019 CRL.A. 416/2002 SUBHEG SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anil Hooda & Mr. Ajay versus Sharma, Advocates along with appellants in person. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP with SI Manish, PS Mangol Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellants were sent for trial on the basis of report (charge sheet) dated 11.02.1996 under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted by Station House Officer (SHO) of Police Station, Mongol Puri upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.1085/1995 of the said police station. The case was committed to the Court of Sessions where they were put on trial on the charge for offence punishable under sections 308 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), wherein Kartar Singh (PW2), Sukhchain Singh (PW8) and Balbir Singh (since deceased) are t...
B. Naveen Kumar & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"05.04.2019 + W.P.(C) 3431/2019 B. NAVEEN KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr.Adv with Ms.Ekta Kapil, Ms.Nimisha Jain, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC for R-1 & 3. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-2. Mr.Abhaya Kumar Behera, Adv for R-5. Mr.S.K.Gupta, Adv for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) C.M. No.15755/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3431/2019 & C.M. No.15754/2019 1. The petitioners assail the order dated 02.11.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in O.A.No.1388/2017. The said original application preferred by the petitioners has been rejected by the Tribunal. In the said original application, they sought to assail the appointment of the respondent nos.4 to 7 on deputation/transfer basis to the post of Assistant Legal Advisers (herein...
Aditi Talwar vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12265/2018 & CM APPLs.15612-13/2019 ADITI TALWAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal Adv. with Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv. for University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the fateful day of 15th May, 2018, the petitioner Aditi Talwar was attempting her third Generic Elective examination of the fourth semester of the B.A (Hons.) Economics course, as a student of the Shyama Prasad Mukherjee College. The examination was of three hours duration, from 3.00 p.m. to 6.00 p.m.2. According to the averments in the writ petition, a student, seated near the petitioner, threw a spiral bound book, which fell near the petitioners table, and, on seeing the spiral book in the vicinity of the seat of the petitioner, the Reporting Officer Ms. Chandrakanta, a teacher in the...
Bhandari Foils and Tubes vs.mawana Sugars Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 321/2015 BHANDARI FOILS AND TUBES ........ Petitioner Date of Decision :5. h April, 2019 Through: Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Mr.N.M.Sharma, Ms.Prachi Gupta, Advs. versus MAWANA SUGARS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Divya Bhalla, Mr.Aathira Pillai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 05.02.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Purchase Order dated 02.03.2006 placed by the respondent on the petitioner for supply of 1,55,079 KG of Stainless Steel Welded Tubes (hereinafter referred to as SS Tubes).2. The Arbitrator by the Impugned Award has rejected the claim of the petitioner that the said Purchase Order was not a concluded and binding contra...
Sheetal Vihar Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. And Ors. Vs.the R ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 3495/2019 SHEETAL VIHAR COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rakesh Munjal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Raghav Jha & Mr.Pranshu Garg, Adv. versus THE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS. Through: Mr.Anjum ........ RESPONDENTS with Mr.Devendra Kumar & Mr.Faran Ahmed, Advs. for R-1 to 3. Javed, ASC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) C.M. No.16032/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3495/2019 & C.M. No.16031/2019 1. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 25.02.2019 passed by the Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies, conveying the decision of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies that the election of the President and WP (C) No.3495/2019 Page 1 of 7 Secretary of the petitioner no.1/society, i.e., Sheetal Vihar Cooperative Group Hous...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »