Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Stelling Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (railyatri.in) and Anr. Vs.indian ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 13, 2018 Judgment delivered on: April 05, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9864/2017, CM No.40141/2017 M/S STELLING TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. (RAILYATRI.IN) AND ANR. Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioners Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Mr. Jiten Mehra, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Anand Daga, Ms. Gunjan Ahuja and Mr. Iqram Govind Singh, Advs. for R3. versus INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Adv. for IRCTC AND + W.P.(C) 8562/2017, CM No.35240/2017 MR. ANAND PUROHIT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Mr. Yuvraj Sharma and Ms. Sneh Suman, Advs. Versus INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Adv. for IRCTC. Mr. Arjun Garg and Mr. Manish Yadav, Advs. for R2. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Mr. Jiten Mehra, Ms. Van...
Eshan Saraf vs.guru Gobind Sing Indraprastha University & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7640/2018 ESHAN SARAF Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SING INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 05.04.2019 An order, No.F16112/2002-03/Admn Pol/DDTE/Pt.File/63, dated 10th February, 2004, issued by the Department of Training and Technical Education (hereinafter referred to as the DTTE) Government of Delhi, constitutes the fulcrum of the controversy in the present case. The relevant passages from the said order, therefore, merit reproduction thus : A. ADMISSION GGS IP University shall conduct the Common Entrance Tests (CETs) for all AlCTE approved Degree level Programmes offered at its affiliated Institutes and shall also conduct admissions in respect of Delhi seats i.e. 85% of the sanctioned intake, except for BHMCT for which W.P.(C) 7640/2018...
Mahesh Kumar vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 05, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 875/2019 & CRL.M.As. 7237-38/2019 MAHESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Biswajit S. and Mr. Deepak Versus Tyagi, Advocates THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Jyoti Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in FIR No.39/19, under Sectionof IPC, registered at police station R.K.Puram, Delhi while claiming that there is delay of twelve years in lodging this FIR. It is pointed out that the relationship between petitioner and prosecutrix was consensual. Learned counsel for petitioner places reliance upon Supreme Courts decision in Dr. Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2019 [1]. JCC217[SC].. He further submits that petitioner is working as a cleaner with Northern Railways and since he has now married elsewhere, therefore, he has been imp...
Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs.fepl Engineering (P) Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 144/2019 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ........ Petitioner Date of Decision :5. h April, 2019 Through: Mr.Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Amit Meharia, Ms.Tannishtha Singh, Ms.Priya Singh, Advs. versus FEPL ENGINEERING (P) LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Mr.Hunny Veer Singh, Mr.Sarthak Mannan, Ms.Konika Mitra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA49492019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. OMP(Comm.) 144/2019 & IA49482019 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 14.12.2018 passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Konkan Region, Thane, Maharashtra O.M.P.(Comm.) No.144/2019 Page 1 (hereinafter referred to as the MSME Council) under the provisions of the Micro, Small and Medium ...
Lucky Noel vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 78/2019 Reserved on:06. 03.2019 Date of decision:05. 04.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: LUCKY NOEL STATE OF DELHI ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate Through: (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 25.9.2018, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.441011/2016, arising from FIR No.151/2013, PS Chhawla whereunder, he has been convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his mother, Venus Noel. In terms of the order on sentence dated 27.9.2018, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, directed to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. CRL.A. 78/2019 Page 1 of 26 2. The investigation in the present case commenced on 26.5.2013, when the ...
M/S Chaudhary Hira Singh Mandi a Block Mashakhore Hitkari Samiti (Regd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 8323/2017 & CM Nos. 34241/2017 & 20614/2018 HARISH KUMAR MATLANI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sachin Nahar and Mr V.P. for R- Development, Nahar, Advocates 1/Secretary GNCTD. Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC. and + W.P.(C) 8381/2017 & CM No.34518-19/2017 WITH JAWAHAR LAL BHATEJA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Bhanu Gupta, Advocates for R- 1/GNCTD. W.P.(C) 8323/2017& other connected matters Page 1 of 11 Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC.AND and + W.P.(C) 8500/2017 & CM No.35027-28/2017 M/S CHAUDHARY HIRA SINGH MANDI A BLOCK MASHAKHORE HITKARI SAMITI (REGD)........ Peti...
Sh. Satyender Tomar & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 05, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1819/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7288/2019 SH. SATYENDER TOMAR & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Vashisth, Ms. Rita Rana & Mr. Vishwas Ahuja, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sumit Kumar. + CRL.M.C. 1836/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7334/2019 SH. PAWAN KUMAR SAINI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Vashisth, Ms. Rita Rana & Mr. Vishwas Ahuja, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sumit. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions quashing of cross FIR Nos. 755/2015 under Sections 323/341/354(B)/451/506/5of IPC and FIR Crl.M.C. 1819/2019 & Crl.M.C. 1836/2019 Page 1 of 3 No.754/2015 under Sections 341/354(B)/451/5of IPC both registered at police station Jyoti Nagar, Delhi are sought on the ground that the mis...
In the Matter of Shinsho K Mac Precisions Parts (India) Private Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~CP-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 04.2019 CO.PET. 9/2019 IN THE MATTER OF SHINSHO K MAC PRECISIONS PARTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner * % + Through Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. on behalf of the OL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Section 497(6) of The Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking voluntary winding up of the Company SHINSHO K MAC PRECISIONS PARTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED (VOL. LIQN.) (herein referred to as the said company).2. A perusal of the petition shows that the said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act on 29.03.2012 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana (ROC), having authorized share capital of Rs. 1.75 Crores divided into 17,50,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/-. The Paid up capital of the said company was Rs. 15,14,10,000 (Fifteen Crores Fourteen Lakhs Ten Thousand) divided 1,51,41,000 equit...
Elder Projects Ltd. & Anr. Vs.elder Pharmacia Llp & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1313/2018, 828/2019, 2917-2918/2019 Reserved on:26thMarch 2019 Pronounced on 05th April 2019 I.As. 17710-17711/2018, 827- ELDER PROJECTS LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Neel Mason, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mitta, Mr. Sumit Ms. VishaliTanwar, Ms. Sabia Veqar, Ms. Ekta Sharma and Mr. Sharma, Advocates. Shivang Rajput, versus ELDER PHARMACIA LLP & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Nancy Roy, Advocate. Mr. K.P. Toms, Advocate with Mr. Anil S. Bist, Advocate for Defendant No.5. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J CS(COMM) 1313/2018 1. The present suit was originally filed seeking decree for permanent injunction, infringement of Trademark, passing off, dilution, unfair competition, rendition of accounts of profits or damages, delivery up CS(COMM) 1313/2018 Page 1 of 27 etc. The court issued summons in the suit on 21st December 2018, and granted an ex parte ad inter...
Union Bank of India vs.collector of Stamps / Sdm & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2872/2019 & CM APPL. 13335/2019 UNION BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr Gautam Gupta, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Ms Urvi Mohan, Advocates for GNCTD. COLLECTOR OF STAMPS / SDM & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0504.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, 1. impugning an order dated 05.03.2019 passed by respondent no.1 (the Collector of Stamps) directing the petitioner to pay a sum of 3,24,161/- and a penalty equivalent to three times the aforesaid amount (determined at 9,72,483/-). Although, the petitioner has filed an appeal under Section 56 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 ( hereafter the Act), the said appeal has not been taken up by the Appellate Authority as the powers to adjudicate the same have not been delegated to the concerned officer as yet. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner has been constr...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »