Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil Kumar @Anil Jain vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1881/2019 & Crl.M.A. 7484/2019 ANIL KUMAR @ANIL JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jatan Singh & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates STATE Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Parveen Kumar Respondent No.2 in person * + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1533/2015, under Sections 323/354/ 354A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 23rd March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Parveen Kumar, on the basis of ide...
M/S. Naman Broadcasting & Telecommunication Pvt. Limited vs.north Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2019
$~48 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 66/2019 Date of Decision :8. h April, 2019 M/S. TELECOMMUNICATION PVT. LIMITED NAMAN BROADCASTING & ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nitin Mittal & Mr.Aditya Awasthi, Advs. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr. Ashwini Mathul & Ms.Swagata Bhuyan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner inter alia praying for the following relief:-"itself, (a)Pass an order of injunction restraining the Respondent by its officers, employees, servants/agents or any other person whosoever, from interfering, damaging, removing in any manner whatsoever commercial display in the of O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 66/2019 Page 1 the advertisement boards/displays displayed...
National Projects Construction Corporation Limited (Npcc) vs.deputy Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 592/2019 & C.M. APPL.2622/2019 NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED (NPCC) Petitioner Through : Mr. Tarun Gulati, Mr. Yashwant Singh and Ms. Sparsh Bhargava, Advs. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. Respondents Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. In the present writ petition, the validity of an order under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act (hereafter referred to as Act) issued by the Assessing Officer (hereafter referred to as AO) on behalf of the respondent (hereafter referred to as Revenue) has been challenged. The petitioner, a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) and hereafter called NPCC, urges various grounds, including non-application of mind and unfairness by the AO.2. The NPCC filed its return for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17 on 16.10.2016 declaring a t...
Lalit Kumar Saxena vs.the Institute of Cost Accountants of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 321/2017 LALIT KUMAR SAXENA ........ Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given). versus THE INSTITUTE OF COST ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr G.S. Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0804.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. that directions be issued to the respondents to issue a certificate certifying that the petitioner has passed the final examination of the Cost Accountants of India. Respondent no.1 is the Institute of Cost Accountants of India (ICAI) and has been constituted under the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959.2. ICAI conducts an academic course for acquiring the qualification of a cost accountant. The said course is divided into two examinations, namely, intermediate and final. Both the examinations consist of two groups (referred to as Stages). The intermediate examination comprises of Stage-...
Puneet Uppadhyay & Ors vs.state (Gnct Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 08, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1850/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7384/2019 PUNEET UPPADHYAY & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Sharma, Advocate. Versus STATE (GNCT DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.340/2015, under Sections 498-A/406/3of IPC, registered at Police Station Dabri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 8th February, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Praveen Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolve...
M/S Jaiprakash Associates Limited vs.nhpc Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2019
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:08. 04.2019 + CS(COMM) 907/2018 M/S JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, Adv. versus NHPC LIMITED .... Defendant Through: Mr.Tarekshwer Nath, Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Mr. Mahavir Rawat and Ms. Niti Singh, Advs. with Ms.Bhawna, Law Officer, NHPC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): IA No.2419/2019 1. The captioned interlocutory application represents objections filed on behalf of the defendant i.e. NHPC Limited (hereafter referred to as NHPC) under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short 1940 Act).2. The application was heard by me at some length on 04.04.2019. In the proceedings held on that date, I had recorded the submission of counsel for parties with regard to the main issue at hand. While I wanted to dispose of the matter on 04.04.2019, I was persuaded by Mr. Nath, who, appears for NHPC, to stand over the matter as he wanted to pl...
Harish Kumar Matlani and Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 8323/2017 & CM Nos. 34241/2017 & 20614/2018 HARISH KUMAR MATLANI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sachin Nahar and Mr V.P. for R- Development, Nahar, Advocates 1/Secretary GNCTD. Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC. and + W.P.(C) 8381/2017 & CM No.34518-19/2017 WITH JAWAHAR LAL BHATEJA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Bhanu Gupta, Advocates for R- 1/GNCTD. W.P.(C) 8323/2017& other connected matters Page 1 of 11 Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC.AND and + W.P.(C) 8500/2017 & CM No.35027-28/2017 M/S CHAUDHARY HIRA SINGH MANDI A BLOCK MASHAKHORE HITKARI SAMITI (REGD)........ Peti...
Jawahar Lal Bhateja & Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 8323/2017 & CM Nos. 34241/2017 & 20614/2018 HARISH KUMAR MATLANI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sachin Nahar and Mr V.P. for R- Development, Nahar, Advocates 1/Secretary GNCTD. Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC. and + W.P.(C) 8381/2017 & CM No.34518-19/2017 WITH JAWAHAR LAL BHATEJA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr A.K. Shrivastav and Mr Vineet Jindal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Bhanu Gupta, Advocates for R- 1/GNCTD. W.P.(C) 8323/2017& other connected matters Page 1 of 11 Mr Manish Garg, Mr Vijay Saini MsSamridhi, Advocates for R-2/APMC.AND and + W.P.(C) 8500/2017 & CM No.35027-28/2017 M/S CHAUDHARY HIRA SINGH MANDI A BLOCK MASHAKHORE HITKARI SAMITI (REGD)........ Peti...
Sh. Rakesh Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 05, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1822/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7296/2019 SH. RAKESH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Talwar, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Surinder Dutt. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.153/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar, (District West), Delhi is sought on the basis affidavit of 8th March, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Surinder Dutt on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved vide afores...
Ishvakoo (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.national Projects Construction Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:5. 4.2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 57/2019 ISHVAKOO (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vishal Nautiyal and Mr. Abhay Raj Verma, Advs. versus NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajat Arora and Ms. Vishalakshi Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act).2. Notice in this petition was issued on 21.2.2019. Reply on behalf of the respondent has been filed therein.3. The substantive prayers made in the petition are as follows: (a) Allow the present application and further direct the Respondent to immediately refund the amount of Rs.3,50,00,000/- to the... Petitioner (in terms of order dated 20.09.2018) being the amount appropriated by it by wron...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »