Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishan Gopal vs.parveen Rajput
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h March, 2019 Date of decision:29. h April, 2019 + CS (OS) 523/2018 KRISHAN GOPAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Yashpal Singh and Ms. Veronica Advocates. Johnson, Shikha (M:9999309400) versus PARVEEN RAJPUT ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ashok Mahajan, Advocate with Defendant in person (M:98111. 6159). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The Plaintiff Sh. Krishan Gopal entered into a Collaboration Agreement (hereinafter agreement) dated 14th February, 2013 with the Defendant Sh. Parveen Rajput in respect of property bearing no.1/7211, Gali No.1, Shivaji Park, Shahdara, Delhi-110032, measuring 200 sq. yds (hereinafter suit property). At the time of the agreement, the property had only a single storey. As per the agreement, the Defendant had agreed to construct the stilt parking on the ground floor as also construct the upper ground floor, first floor, second floor and third floor. In consideration ...
Dildar Singh & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1657/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6651/2019 DILDAR SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Dev Sharma, Advocate. Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Ms. Rinku Narula, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.447/2016, under Section 323/354/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 19th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by Additional Public Prosecutor, on the b...
Mr. Pardeep Yadav & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2245/2019 MR. PARDEEP YADAV & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Pawar, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Ram Niwas. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 8967/2019 (delay in re-filing) There is delay of 7 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2245/2019 Quashing of FIR No.186/2018, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Bindapur, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 19th March, 2019 of respondent No.2. Crl.M.C. 2245/2019 Page 1 of 3 Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of F...
Syed Mohd Zishan Ali vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
#6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29th April, 2019 CRL.A. 923/2018 SYED MOHD ZISHAN ALI ..... Appellant versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. M.S. Khan and Mr. Prashant Prakash, Advocates. : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State along with ACP Lalit Mohan Negi, Inspector Ravinder Tyagi, SI, Vikas Deep. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (OPEN COURT) 1. The present appeal under Section 21 (4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, assails the Order dated 12th July, 2018, in Case No.9378/2018, titled as State vs. Sayed Mohd. Zishan Ali, passed by Additional Sessions Judge-02 (FTC), District Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, whereby the bail application instituted on behalf of the appellant, came to be dismissed. CRL.A. 923/2018 Page 1 of 4 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant invi...
Punjab National Bank vs.ghanshyam Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA282019 & CM APPL. 2075/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jagat Arora with Mr.Rajat Arora & Mr.Murad Khan, Advocates. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK GHANSHYAM KUMAR & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sarvesh K.Dubey, Advocate. + LPA302019 & CM APPL. 2113/2019 INSTITUTE OF BANKING & PERSONNEL SELCTION ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jagat Arora with Mr.Rajat Arora GHANSHYAM KUMAR & ORS Through: Mr.Sarvesh K.Dubey, Advocate. & Mr.Murad Khan, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI ORDER2904.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the same impugned judgment LPAs 28 & 30/2019 Page 1 of 10 dated 16th November 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing WP (C) 4674 of 2015 filed by Respondent No.1.2. The background facts are that the Institute of Banking and Personnel Selection (IBPS) issued an advertisement on 10th July 2013 for recruitment on the post of...
M/S Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd. Vs.m/s Veritas Investment Research Cor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :4. h February, 2019 Date of decision :29. h April, 2019 CS (OS) 2919/2014, CCP(O) 39/2015, I.As. 18666/2014, 766/2015, 7457/2015, 15025/2015, 17388/2015, 21429/2015 M/S INDIABULLS REAL ESTATE LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Mumtaz Bhalla, Mr. Aayush Malhotra & Ms. Abhilasha Vij, Advocates (M-9560703760) M/S VERITAS INVESTMENT RESEARCH CORPORATION & ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Dube & Mr. Rajul Shrivastava, Advs. (M-9891860220) Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mamta Tiwari & Ms. Charu Ambwani, Advocates for D-4 AND CS(OS) 3199/2014 & CCP(O) 51/2015, I.As. 20503/2014, 7351/2015, 15030/2015, 17390/2015 & 25811/2015 M/S INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mamta Tiwari & Ms. Charu Ambwani, Advocates M/S VERITAS INVESTMENT RESEARCH CORPORATION & ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Dube & Mr. Rajul Shrivastava, Advocates. Ms. M...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.shailesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1025/2018 IN THE MATTER OF: STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant Reserved on:25. 03.2019 Date of decision:29. 04.2019 SHAILESH KUMAR Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Manjeet Singh, P.S. Punjabi Bagh. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Gaba, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The State is aggrieved by the judgment dated 31.5.2018, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, West, (ASJ) Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short, POCSO Act) in Sessions Case No.57589 of 2016 (old No.22 of 2015), arising from FIR No.828/2014, PS Punjabi Bagh, whereunder, the respondent has been acquitted of the charges for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 366 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He has also been acquitted of the alternate charge for the offence under Section 376 IPC.2. The prosecution case wa...
Manjit Singh Kocher & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2290/2019 MANJIT SINGH KOCHER & ORS Through: Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Dev Kumar Mr.H.S. Sasan, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.As.9072-73/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2290/2019 Quashing of FIR No.1243/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Janak Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 13th November, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Dev Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 2290/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, pr...
Nitin Gupta vs.texmaco Infrastructure & Holding Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1215/2016 & CC(COMM) 36/2017 Date of decision:29. h April, 2019 NITIN GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta and Ms. Versus Surbhi Gupta, Advs. TEXMACO INFRASTRUCTURE & HOLDING LIMITED Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Adv. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.9/2019 (of plaintiff u/S151CPC) 1. The plaintiff, by this application post framing of issues, seeks to file an additional document.2. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.2,36,95,461/-. It is inter alia the case of the plaintiff, (i) that the defendant had agreed to sell an immovable property to the plaintiff and one Ashwini Kumar Somany; (ii) that the plaintiff and the said Ashwini Kumar Somany paid a sum of Rs.1,75,00,000/- in pursuance to the said Agreement to Sell; (iii) that the said amount of Rs.1,75,00,000/- along with interest has already been returned by the defendant to the plaintiff and the said Ashwini K...
Fiberfill Engineers vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 2.2019 Pronounced on:29. 03.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 303/2017 FIBERFILL ENGINEERS ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Mansi Kukreja and Ms. Vidhi Goel, Advs. versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Ms. Mala Narayan and Ms. Neha Dawar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Preface:1. This petition is directed against the award dated 12.4.2017 passed by sole Arbitrator appointed out of a panel of names of three Arbitrators given to the petitioner by the respondent. The petition has been preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act).2. The petitioner before this Court is a partnership firm by the name: Fiberfill Engineers. For the sake of convenience, hereafter the petitioner will be referred to as FFE while the respondent, that is, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, will be referred to as IOCL. However, collect...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »