Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Elegant Exports vs.commissioner of Customs, Inland Container Depot & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~2 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2417/2019 M/S CAMRON EXPORTS versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS INLAND CONTAINER DEPOT & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2523/2019 ELEGANT EXPORTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, INLAND CONTAINER DEPOT & ORS. Present: Mr.Akhil Krishan Maggu & Mr.Rishab Nagar, Advocates for ........ RESPONDENTS the... Petitioners. Mr.Harpreet Singh, Sr.Std.Counsel with Ms.Suhani Mathur, Advocate for the... RESPONDENTS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) % 1. Issue notice. Mr.Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice.2. The petitioner states that his bank accounts have been frozen [ICICI Bank Account No.25005500904 & IndusInd Bank Account No.201002412697]..3. The facts are that the respondent/Customs Authorities issued notices on 06.02.2019, to enquire into allegations of bogus addresses for ...
Sanjay Kumar Jha vs.madan Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 460/2018 & Crl.M.A. 32739/2018 SANJAY KUMAR JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Alok & Mr. Ranjan Roy, Advocates Versus Through: Nemo. ..... Respondent MADAN LAL CRL.REV.P. 461/2018 & Crl.M.A. 32738/2018 SANJAY KUMAR JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Alok & Mr. Ranjan Roy, Advocates MAHAVIR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Versus Through: Nemo. ..... Respondent ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions the challenge is to petitioners conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentence of simple imprisonment for six months and fine of 2,10,000/- each with default clause in the two complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 relating to dishonouring of cheque of 1,50,000/- each. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that these two petitions are required to be heard together. Accordingly, these petitions have been h...
Shaitan Singh Meena vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 860/2017 SHAITAN SINGH MEENA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naushad Alam with Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR versus Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC. % CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER2404.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the quashing of an order dated 18th January 2017 issued by the Presiding Officer, Kritrim Ang Kendra (Artificial Limb Centre ALC) informing the... Petitioner that his candidature for the post of Limb Maker Carpenter (ST) at ALC, Pune [functioning under the Armed Forces Medical Services (AFMS)]. has been cancelled in view of the verification report received from the police regarding the conviction of the... Petitioner for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 447 and 3IPC. The... Petitioner also seeks a direction to the Director General of the AFMS to issue him an appoin...
Manish Kumar Roy & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3499/2017 MANISH KUMAR ROY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Praveen Kumar Sharma. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 49962/2018 Learned counsel for petitioners submits that inadvertently the application has been filed. The application is dismissed as not pressed. Crl.M.A. 49961/2018 (for Restoration) By way of this application restoration of the petition is sought by petitioners. Upon hearing, the order of 8th August, 2018 is recalled and this petition is restored to its original position. Crl.M.C. 3499/2017 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 3499/2017 Quashing of FIR No.264/2016, under Sections 420/120B of IPC registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 30th August, 2017 of respondent...
Union of India vs.p.a. Rosha & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 1469/2017 & C.M. No.6710/2017 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Mr.Aman Bakhshi, Advs. & Mr.Ram Singh, S.P. & Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Jha, ASO. versus P.A. ROSHA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anil Grover with Ms.Noopur Singhal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the Union of India assails the order dated 18.07.2016 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (Tribunal) in OA No.1093/2013. The aforesaid original application had been preferred by the respondent no.1 to seek inter alia a direction to the petitioner to re-fix his notional pay at Rs.8,000/- w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and grant him all consequential revisions and thereafter pay him the arrears of pension with interest after re-fi...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.shivani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2019 MAC.APP. 489/2019 % + NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. SHIVANI & ORS. Versus Through: Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) MAC.APP. 489/2019 & CM Nos.19037-38/2019 1. The appellant Insurance Company has impugned an order dated 23.01.2019 awarding compensation of an amount of Rs.8,70,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum, from the date of filing of the Detailed Accident Report (DAR) till realization of the aforesaid monies. The compensation has been awarded to a six year old girl, who was injured in a motor vehicle accident and has suffered 40% permanent disability in her right lower limb. The challenge is to the quantum of Rs.4,00,000/- instead of Rs.3,00,000/-, awarded apropos the aforesaid disability.2. The learned counsel for the appellant relies upon the judgment of Master Mallikarjuna vs. Divisiona...
Praveen Kumar & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2160/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8613/2019 PRAVEEN KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay K. Sondhi, Mr. Ajay Sondhi, Mr. Karan Dev Chopra & Mr. Ambar Tewari, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Jaibir Singh. Mr. Vaibhav and Ms. Monica with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.96/2019, under Sections 354/509/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Lodhi Colony, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 23rd April, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been Cr...
State vs.damodar @ Dharamveer & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 04.2019 % + STATE CRL. L.P. 828/2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Sumit, PS Aman Vihar. Versus DAMODAR @ DHARAMVEER & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.M. Bari, Advocate for R-1 with respondent no.1 in person. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. This Criminal Leave Petition has been filed by the State against the impugned judgment dated 19.09.2018 passed by the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi (ASJ), acquitting both the respondents of the offences under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).2. As per the case of the prosecution, on 17.07.2017 the respondent no.1, Damodar @ Dharamveer (A-1) brought his 7 year old daughter Tanisha (since deceased) to SGM Hospital where she CRL.L.P. No.828/2018 Page 1 of 6 was ...
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.kamla & Ors (Bajaj Allianz Gene ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~76 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. 04.2019 MAC.APP. 488/2019 & CM APPL. 19028/2019 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr.D.K. Sharma, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus KAMLA & ORS (BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant - Insurance company impugns the order dated 18.02.2019 awarding compensation of Rs. 27,80,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum, from the date of filing of the Detailed Accident Report (DAR) till realization of amount within 30 days, failing which to pay an interest @ 12% per annum. The compensation has been awarded to the dependants of Mr. Suresh Chauhan, who passed away on the intervening night of 25th -26th November, 2015, due to fatal collision of his car with a tractor, which was insured by the appellant.2. It is the appellant's case that there was contributory negligence on the part of the deceased as he had been over-speedin...
Sh. Adi Malik vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2019 CRL.REV.P. 415/2019 and Crl.M.A.7424/2019 SH. ADI MALIK STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Darshan Singh, Adv. Mr.Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Ashok Kumar, P.S.Moti Nagar. : : SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner impugns order dated 19.03.2019 whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning order dated 22.11.2017 convicting the petitioner of an offence punishable under Sections 454/3IPC and sentencing him to Simple Imprisonment for a period of six months for each of the offences has been dismissed.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had pleaded guilty before the Trial Court on 22.11.2017 with the expectation that keeping in view the mitigating circumstances and settlement with the complainant, petitioner w...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »