Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Arihant Engineering Industries & Ors. Vs.m/s Leo Ispat Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~1, 2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. h April, 2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 75/2019 & CM.APPL158882019 M/S ARIHANT ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES & ORS. Through Mr. K.G. Sharma, Advocate ..... Appellants versus M/S LEO ISPAT LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wani, Advocate for respondent no.1. + FAO(OS) (COMM) 76/2019 & CM.APPL159092019 M/S ARIHANT ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES & ORS .....Appellant Through Mr. K.G. Sharma, Advocate versus M/S LEO INFRACAPITAL LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wani, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in these appeals is to the order dated 30.01.2019 by which two separate applications filed in two separate suits seeking leave to defend have been allowed in part. The respondents/plaintiffs had instituted two suits for recovery. The learned Single Judge has FAO(OS)(COMM) 75/2019 etc. Page 1 o...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.pawan Garg & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :31. 05.2018 Pronounced on :24. 04.2019 LPA No.369/2016 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for SDMC along with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan and Mr. Shiva Pandey, Advs. versus PAWAN GARG & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Pawan Verma, Mr. Anup Gupta and Mr. Krishan Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The appellant (hereafter SDMC) is aggrieved by a judgment dated 03.03.2016, allowing a writ petition bearing of the respondents (hereafter Garg). Garg filed the writ petition and sought directions, to set aside the decision dated 19.05.14 passed by the Lay Out Scrutiny Committee (hereafter LOSC) of SDMC; and to direct the SDMC to incorporate their (i.e. the respondents) plots, (comprised in khasra No.5, 6, and 14, village Yusuf Sarai Jat now known as property No....
Union of India & Ors vs.awadesh Prasad Tripathi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision :24. h April, 2019 W.P.(C) 2723/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.T.P.Singh, Advocate. Mr.Yakesh Anand, Ms.Sonam Anand and Ms. Deepshikha Sansanwal, Advocates for P-2. + versus AWADESH PRASAD TRIPATHI & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. Respondent had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as CAT) with several claims including a direction for grant of due service benefits for promotion under the then existing Employees State Insurance Corporation (Regional Director Grade A/Director) Recruitment Regulations, 2007, with all consequential benefits and also to count their ad-hoc service as Joint Director for all purposes. The Central Administrative Tribunal granted relief; as a result ESIC/Union of India instituted this pro...
Lokesh @ Sonu vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct, Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1206/2019 & CRL.M.A. 4720/2019 LOKESH @ SONU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashutosh Rana, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Satyender Gulia. Mr. Narendra Gautam, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.607/2013, under Sections 354/452/506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Mehrauli, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 20th February, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been Crl.M.C. 1206/2019 Page 1 of 3 ide...
Reshma vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~12 & 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 928/2005 Decided on:-"24th April, 2019 MOHD. AZIM STATE + CRL.A. 250/2006 RESHMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the ..... Respondent State. Through: Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the ..... Respondent State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 30.05.2004, on the basis of secret information, Inspector Ajit Singh (PW-19), the station house officer of police station Kamla Market, assisted by other police personnel, raided the premises of Kotha No.59, second floor, left side, on GB Road, Delhi, where a girl aged about 17 years old was found wrongfully confined for the Crl.Appeal Nos.928/2005 &250/2006 Page 1 of 11 purposes of she being forced into prostitution. The girl (PW-1) was found to be a native of a village in the State of Karnataka. She was sent for medical examina...
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence vs.m/s Prk Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :09. 03.2018 Date of decision :24. 04.2019 + Crl.M.C.No.4316/2016 and Crl. M.A. Nos. 17965/16, 20232/16, 12268/17, 160and 160DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate M/s PRK DIAMONDS PVT. LTD. & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dalip Singh, Advocate & Crl.M.C.No.4767/2016 and Crl.M.A. No.19836/2016 + DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate INDER PRAKASH KOHLI @ BABOO KOHLI ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Dalip Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, assails vide these two petitions a common order dated 31.8.2016 of the Crl.M.C. Nos. 4316/2016 and 47Page 1 of 48 learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide which a Mercedes car bearing No.DL-1CQ-7525 containing 8 Kg. of gold which was seized from it on 8...
Dr. Gyanendra Kumar and Ors. Vs.registrar Co-Operative Societies, Govt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15. * + % W.P.(C) 3221/2019 & C.M. No.14896/2019 DR. GYANENDRA KUMAR AND ORS. Date of Decision:24. 04.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Akhil Sacher, Ms.Sunanda Tulsyan, Mr. Sachin Jain & Ms. Diya Kapoor, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh K. Tripathi, ASC, GNCTD along with Mr. Virendra Kumar, RCS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies (RCS) has filed a short counter-affidavit in the matter. We have heard learned counsels.2. The petitioners grievances were taken note of in our order dated 01.04.2019. To understand the background of the controversy raised, we reproduce the said order: The grievance of the petitioner is two-fold. Firstly, it is pointed out that the society requested the Registrar of W.P.(C.) No.322...
Sajid & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2135/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8555/2019 SAJID & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.B. Pandey & Mr. M. Bansal, Advocates. Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector S.P. Singh. Mr. S.M. Shah, Advocate with Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.188/2015, under Sections 323/452/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Welcome Colony, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 6th April, 2019 of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent Nos. 2 to 4 present in the Court, are the complainants/first-informants of FIR in question and they have been identified to be so, b...
M/S Arihant Engineering Industries & Ors vs.m/s Leo Infracapital Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~1, 2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. h April, 2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 75/2019 & CM.APPL158882019 M/S ARIHANT ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES & ORS. Through Mr. K.G. Sharma, Advocate ..... Appellants versus M/S LEO ISPAT LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wani, Advocate for respondent no.1. + FAO(OS) (COMM) 76/2019 & CM.APPL159092019 M/S ARIHANT ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES & ORS .....Appellant Through Mr. K.G. Sharma, Advocate versus M/S LEO INFRACAPITAL LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wani, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in these appeals is to the order dated 30.01.2019 by which two separate applications filed in two separate suits seeking leave to defend have been allowed in part. The respondents/plaintiffs had instituted two suits for recovery. The learned Single Judge has FAO(OS)(COMM) 75/2019 etc. Page 1 o...
Governing Body of Hindu College vs.dr Ratan Lal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d April, 2019 Pronounced on:24. h April, 2019 LPA7272018 & CM APPL.54024/2018 (for stay) + GOVERNING BODY OF HINDU COLLEGE .... Appellant Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra, Ms. Chandni Sadana, Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Mr. Sidhant Kumar, Mr. V.K. Nagkath, Ms. Kaveri Gupta, Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Mr. Kunal Sharma and Mr. Jitender Panchal, Advocates. Versus DR RATAN LAL & ORS Through: Mr.Aditya Kumar ........ RESPONDENTS Choudhary, Mr.Arjun D Singh, Mr.Amit Pratap Shaunak and Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Neeraj, Advocate with Mr. Sahaj Garg, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the Governing Body ('GB') of Hindu College (hereafter College) against a judgment dated 27th November, 2018 passed LPA7272018 Page 1 of 28 by the learned Single Judge allowin...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »