Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Ace Integrated Solutions Ltd vs.food Corporation of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2019
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h April, 2019 + LPA2642019 and C.M. No.18014/2019 (for stay) M/S ACE INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Rohtagi, Advocate with Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Bahul Kalra, Advocate and Mr. Akshit Pradhan, Advocate. versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj, Standing Counsel with Ms. Aparna Sinha, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT The appellant M/s ACE Integrated Solutions Limited (ACE) impugns order dated 25.02.2019 made in W.P.(C) No.1954/2019, by which writ petition ACE had challenged termination of its contract by respondent LPA No.264/2019 page 1 of 24 No.1Food Corporation of India(FCI) and its blacklisting in the same context for a period of five years. By or...
Suresh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 977/2019 Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2019 SURESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus STATE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SI Virendra Kumar, PS Seelampur JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.373/2017 under Section 307 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act, Police Station Seelampur.2. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of the wife of the petitioner and the injured is the son of the petitioner.3. It is alleged that petitioner was in the habit of drinking everyday and on an issue with regard to return of money which the injured was demanding from a neighbour, who was the friend of the petitioner, petitioner got angry and brought a country made pistol and shot the injured.4.... Petitioner has been in custody since ...
Today Tea Ltd. Vs.today Foods Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h April, 2019 TODAY TEA LTD. CS (COMM) 464/2018 & I.A. 10693/2003 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bharat S. Kumar, Advocate. versus (M:9818357161) TODAY FOODS PVT. LTD. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. ..... Defendant Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. `Chai-Biscuits - this oft-used term is at the core of the present dispute. The Plaintiff sells tea under the mark TODAY. The Defendant sells biscuits under the same mark. As the expression `Chai-biscuits conveys, Tea and biscuits go hand in hand. They are products served together in every home and every street corner tea stall across the country. They form part of the early morning staple diet of millions of people across the world including India. Both these are cognate and allied products.2. The Plaintiff - Today Tea Ltd. (hereinafter, Plaintiff) has filed the present suit seeking injunction restraining the infringement of its registered trademark, passing off...
Dcm Ltd. Vs.mcd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 02.2018 Pronounced on:24. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 1174/2010 DCM LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. B.B. Jain and Mr. Abhay Jain, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Amita Gupta with Ms. Priti Yadav, Advocates, for MCD. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Advocate, for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. Originally the writ petitioner (hereafter referred to as DCM) had claimed various reliefs such as challenging amended Sections 61A, 116, 116A, 116B, 116K, 123(B)(8), 133, 152-155, 169, 170(b) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act (hereafter referred to as the Act); the amendment of 2003 (hereafter referred to as the Amendment Act) as well as the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Property Taxes) Bye-laws, 2004 (bye laws). DCM also challenged other consequential directions including quashing of a...
Punj Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs.nanhe Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~8 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8741/2009 PUNJ SONS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashwani K. Sakhuja and Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocates.1. versus NANHE SINGH Through: Mr. Kunwar C.M. Khan, Ms. Sheeba Khan, Mr. Shoaib Khan and Mr. Aditya Tanwar, Advocates. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGEMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby compensation of Rs.1,92,000/- along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of filing of claim till realization and litigation cost of Rs.10,000/- has been awarded to the respondent.2. The petitioner appointed the respondent as a security guard on 12th January, 1988. On 04th May, 1992, the petitioner found the respondent sleeping whereupon the petitioner issued a charge sheet and conducted an inquiry against the respondent. The petitioner terminated the respondent on 30th May, 1992 whereupon the respondent raised an industr...
Pramod Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2130/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8534/2019 PRAMOD KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S. Shah, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Praveen Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.697/2016, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 5th September, 2017 (Annexure C) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Praveen Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2130/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the disput...
Mohd. Azim vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
$~12 & 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 928/2005 Decided on:-"24th April, 2019 MOHD. AZIM STATE + CRL.A. 250/2006 RESHMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the ..... Respondent State. Through: Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the ..... Respondent State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 30.05.2004, on the basis of secret information, Inspector Ajit Singh (PW-19), the station house officer of police station Kamla Market, assisted by other police personnel, raided the premises of Kotha No.59, second floor, left side, on GB Road, Delhi, where a girl aged about 17 years old was found wrongfully confined for the Crl.Appeal Nos.928/2005 &250/2006 Page 1 of 11 purposes of she being forced into prostitution. The girl (PW-1) was found to be a native of a village in the State of Karnataka. She was sent for medical examina...
Renu Anand vs.the Maintenance Tribunal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 12318/2015 and CM Nos. 32689/2015 & 34902/2017 RENU ANAND versus ........ Petitioner THE MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner :Mr K.K. Chuchar, Advocate alongwith :petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr N.K. Kantawala and Mr Parashar : Sharma, Advocates for R-3 and R- Mr T.K. Goon, Advocate for R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 12.12.2015 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Maintenance Tribunal (Central District) Delhi (hereafter the Tribunal), whereby the application filed by the petitioners late mother, Smt Satya Rani Chopra, for cancellation of the gift deed in favour of the petitioner was allowed. The Tribunal accepted Smt Satya Rani Chopras claim that she had executed the gift deed under undue...
State (Govt of Nct) vs.sujeet
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
#1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h April, 2019 ........ Petitioner .. Respondent CRL.L.P. 683/2018 & CRL.M.A. 34712/2018 (Delay) STATE (GOVT OF NCT) SUJEET Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : versus Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI Monika (Investigating Officer), SI Ravi Kumar, PS- Karawal Nagar. Mr. Chetan Lokur, Adv. with respondent in person. : For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (OPEN COURT) JUDGMENT CRL.M.A. 34712/2018 (Condonation of delay) 1. The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed on behalf of the applicant/State, seeks condonation of delay of 47 days in filing the accompanying appeal.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Chetan Lokur learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the CRL.L.P. 683/2018 page no.1 of 12 non-applicants/respondents and fairly ...
Ashok Kaushik & Anr vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2156/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8602/2019 ASHOK KAUSHIK & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan & Mr. Gaurav Sarawat, Advocates. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rakesh Singh Ms. Mallika Parmar, Advocate with Attorney of Respondent No.2 & respondent No.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.484/2016, under Sections 354-A/323/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Dwarka South, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 5th April, 2019 of Respondent No.3 and Attorney of Respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Crl.M.C. 2156/2019 Page 1 of 3 Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent- State submits that respondent No.3 and...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »