Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State vs.rahul
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:23. 04.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:30. 04.2019 CRL.A. 496/2015 STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with W/ASI Santosh Kumar, SHO Raj Kumar Saha, ASI Suresh Kumar, PS New Usmanpur. Versus RAHUL ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Advocate (DHCLSC). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The State having been granted leave to appeal vide order dated 22.04.2015 in Crl.L.P.254/2014, assails the impugned judgment dated 20.02.2013 of the learned ASJ-01, North East, KKD Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.424/11, PS New Usmanpur wherein the respondent was acquitted qua the offences punishable under Sections 342/376/511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CRL.A. 496/2015 Page 1 of 30 2. It is the avowed contention of the State that despite the consistent and corroborated testimonies of the victim Ms.X aged 5 year...
State Nct of Delhi vs.danish & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2019 CRL.REV.P. 668/2016 STATE NCT OF DELHI DANISH & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Vinay Kumar For the Respondent : Mr. Jagat Singh Baasta, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 19723/2016 (condonation of delay) Subject petition has been filed along with the application seeking condonation of delay of 215 days in filing the petition. It is contended that initially delay took place on account of obtaining necessary permission for filing the petition and thereafter delay is attributed to the counsel. It is contended that the mother of the counsel was admitted to hospital and as such he could not file the petition within time. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in view of the CRL.REV.P.668/2016 Page 1 of ...
Prem Shankar vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 30, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 66/2019 PREM SHANKAR Through: In person .....Petitioner Versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Praveen Kumar Mr.Sharad Malhotra, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.566/2014, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Keshav Puram, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 24th July, 2018 (Annexure B) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Praveen Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved as...
Ankur Narang vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 743/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5412/2019 (stay) Decided on:30. h April, 2019 ANKUR NARANG ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Hitender Kapur, Adv. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Adv. with SI Yogender PS Paschim Vihar. Mr. Kamal Gupta, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.38/2019 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at PS Paschim Vihar on the complaint of respondent No.2.2. The three grounds taken by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR in question are; first is lack of territorial jurisdiction contending that no offence has taken place in Delhi and thus Police Station has no jurisdiction to investigate and the Trial Court has no jurisdiction to try the offence; secondly, that the FIR was not lodged within the period of limitation and thirdly that on the face of the FIR the ...
Lopamudra Konwar Bhuyan & Anr. Vs.surajit Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. h April, 2019 CRL. REV. P. 42/2016 LOPAMUDRA KONWAR BHUYAN & ANR ........ Petitioners versus SURAJIT SINGH ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Mayank Wadhwa with Ms.Kritika Nagpal, Advs. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms.Madhusmita Bora with Mr.Bijoy Kumar Pradhan, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1... Petitioners impugns order dated 14.09.2015 whereby the trial court, under section 125 Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), held that... Petitioner No.1 wife was not entitled to any maintenance and directed Respondent to pay maintenance @ Rs.10,000/- per month to... Petitioner No.2 minor child from the date of the order till she attains the age of majority.2. Marriage between the parties was solemnized on 23.06.2002 under the Special Marriage Act and a female child was born from the wedlock on 07.03.2004. It is alleged that... Pe...
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.sandeep Seth
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM (M) 140/2019 Judgment reserved on :30. 01.2019 & 29.03.2019 Date of decision :30.04.2019 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED ........ Petitioner SANDEEP SETH Through: Mr. Punit K Bhalla, Advocate versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner M/s ICICI Bank Limited vide the present petition, a CM (M) calling it an appeal seeks the setting aside of an order dated 02.07.2018 of the learned trial Court of the Civil Judge-03 (Central) in Suit No.1633/2018 vide which the prayer made by the petitioner herein as plaintiff of the said suit seeking an ex-parte appointment of the receiver under Order 40 Rule 1 of the CPC, 1908 to take over the possession of the vehicle RITZ/LDI bearing registration No.DL1S2290was declined, observing to the effect that it would amount to injustice to the defendant i.e. the respondent herein if the application was allowed ex-parte in as much as there was a ...
Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 30, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2309/2019 & CRL.M.A. 9168/2019 SANJAY SINGH @ SANJAY KUMAR ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with SI Nikhil Singh. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1158/2014, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar, East District, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 6th February, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Nikhil Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2309/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute...
Shri Ghanshyam Dass and Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 53/2018 $~36 * + CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA SHRI GHANSHYAM DASS AND ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira, versus Advocates with... Petitioners No.1 & 6 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajneesh Sharma, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 & 2 Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for Respondent/LAC/L & B Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Advocate for Respondent/DDA ORDER3004.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayer in the present petition reads as under: (a) issue an appropriate writ, order or directions, thereby declaring the entire acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of... Petitioners comprised in Khasra Nos.394/324/3(1-16), 395/326/3(2-10) & 267 (0-19), totally measuring 5 Bighas and 5 Biswas, situated in the revenue estate of Village Said-UI-Ajaib, Tehsil Mehrauli (now Hauz Khas), New Delhi, initiated vide notification dated 13.11.1959, bearing No.F.15(111)/59-LSG, issue...
Deveinder Singh & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.5429/2017 Reserved on:10. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:30. h April, 2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Ms Saahila Lamba, Advocate. DEVEINDER SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC ....... RESPONDENTS for UOI/R-1 to R-3 with Ms Manisha Saroha, Advocates. Mr Praveen Kumar, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 4 to 56. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The three... Petitioners who were all appointed as Assistant Commandants (ACs) in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) through a Limited Departmental Competitive Examinations mode (LDCE) are in this petition seeking a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to re-fix their seniority in the rank of ACs by placing them above the Respondent Nos. 4 to 56 in the seniority list dated 1st January, 2016. W.P. (C) No.5429/2017 Page 1 of 12 2. The facts which are not in dispute are that each of the three... Petitioners wa...
Rajni Meena and Anr vs.delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
$~9 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 04.2019 W.P.(C) No.6661/2017 RAJNI MEENA AND ANR Through Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ORS Through Mr.Satyakam, Adv. for R- 1 & 2. Mr.Ashutosh Ghade, Adv. with Mr.Nikhil Goel, Adv. for SDMC. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM No.50337/2018 (for early hearing) 1. Since the writ petition is being taken up for hearing, the application is dismissed. W.P.(C) No.6661/2017 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 26.04.2017, passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in CP No.633/2016 arising out of OA No.3826/2013. The Tribunal has dismissed the said contempt petition preferred by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order passed by the Tribunal in OA No.3826/2013. The said original application had been preferred by the petitioner ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »