Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kripa Shankar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. 02.2019 Pronounced on:27. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 15825/2006 KRIPA SHANKAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Srivastava & Mr.Deepak Mahajan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Soumava Karmakar and Ms. Madhuir Dhingra, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Aproov Kurup, Mr.Avinash Rathi and Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Advs. for UGC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. This writ petition is directed against orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter, "the Tribunal") dated 13.01.2006 in O.A. No.1960/2004 and 31.7.2006 in RA No.106/2006.2. The writ petitioner was the applicant in O.A. No.1960/2004. He moved the Tribunal against an order dated 04.08.2004 by which the respondent No.3 herein had been promoted to the post of Assistant Registrar in the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (herein...
Hindustan Unilever Limited vs.emami Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:27. 03.2019 CS(COMM) 1109/2018 HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Chander M.Lall, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Arunabh Deb, Ms.Nancy Roy, Mr.Arijit Mazumdar, Mr.Shambo Nandy, Mr.Akshay Chandna and Ms. Akanksha Kaushik, Advs. versus EMAMI LIMITED ..... Defendant Through Mr.Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ms.Roohina Dua and Mr.Cheitanya Madan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.12201/2018 1. This application is filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC seeking an injunction to restrain the defendant from issuing or telecasting the impugned television commercial or part of the impugned television commercial or in any manner disparaging the goodwill and reputation of the plaintiffs product Fair & Lovely in any advertisement and in any media whatsoever including electronic media. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. The accompanying suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction, damages, inf...
Sanjeev@sanjay & Ors. Vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 27, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1610/2019 SANJEEV@SANJAY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Zihad Ali and Ms. Nisha, Advocates. Versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Shiv Prakash. Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.48/2010, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Anand Parbat, Central Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 15th January, 2013 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Shiv Prakash on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1610/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Cour...
International Lease Finance Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6490/2018 Reserved on:18. 02.2019 Pronounced on :27. 03.2019 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION ... Petitioner Through: Sh. Neeraj Sharma, Sh. Alok Tiwari, Ms. Dakshayani Saxena, Ms. Shubhangi Mehrish and Ms. Anjali Menghani, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Sh. Pawan Pathak, for Sh. Vivek Goyal, CGSC, for UOI. Sh. Amit Bansal, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. Sh. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Sarun Jain, Advocate, for Respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The petitioner in this proceeding (International Lease Finance Corporation, described hereafter as ILFC) claims a direction to the third respondent (hereafter CELEBI to refund demurrage amount, paid by it pursuant to directions of the court, to secure the release of its aircraft engine. CELEBIs refusal to refund the amount is based on its position that th...
Ms. Shalini Srivastava vs.state and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
$~OS-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 03.2019 + TEST.CAS. 71/2017 MS. SHALINI SRIVASTAVA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.T.K.Tiwar, Adv. with Mr.Chandra Dutt, Attesting Witness. versus STATE AND OTHERS Through None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed this present petition under section 278 of the Indian Succession Act seeking grant of Letter of Administration in favour of the petitioner with respect to the will dated 15.07.2015 which was executed by Late Smt. Madhu Bala Srivastava (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) who has expired on 04.08.2015 at New Delhi.2. It has been averred in the petition that the petitioner and respondent No.2 to 5 are the children of the deceased and the only surviving legal heirs.3. Notice was issued by this court on 05.12.2017 and was served to respondents. Respondent No.2, 4 and 5 have entered appearance and supported the case of the petitioner b...
Eveready Industries India Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 09.2018 Pronounced on:27. 03.2019 W.P.(C) 8089/2017 EVEREADY INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Basava Prabhu Patil, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Reena Khair, Sh. Rajesh Sharma, Ms. Rita Jha, Ms. Shreya Dahiya and Sh. Geeta Ahuja, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Sh. Abhigyan Siddhant, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Sh. Arshad Hidaytullah, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Jitendra Singh, Ms. Shailu Kher Hidaytullah and Sh. Anshuman Sahni, Advocates, for Respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The writ petitioner (hereafter Eveready) questions the decision of the second respondent (the Designated Authority hereafter DA) in a notification dated 27.09.2016 (Impugned Final Findings), recommending against the imposition of anti-dumping duties on imports of AA Dry C...
Dvm College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
$~7 * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h March, 2019 W.P.(C) 2726/2019 DVM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, ........ Petitioner Mr. Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, SC- NCTE with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Adv. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 27.03.2019 On 26th November, 2012, the National Council for Teachers Education issued a public notice, inviting applications from institutions who wanted to start new courses for the academic session 2013-2014. In response thereto, the petitioner also applied. Regulation 5(3) of the National Council for Teachers Education (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the 2009 Regulations) required the application to be submitted electronically through online mode available on the website of the National Council for Teac...
Pico Deepali Overlays Consortium & Ors. Vs.deepali Designs & Exhibits ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
$~ * + + 18773-18774/2018, RFA(OS)(COMM) 3/2018 & CM Appl. 7562-7563/2018, 7618-7619/2018, 10570-10571/2019 PICO DEEPALI OVERLAYS CONSORTIUM & ORS. 45489-45490/2018, IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:27. 03.2019 RFA(OS)(COMM) 22/2017 & CM Appl. 42543/2017 & 2903-2904/2019 DEEPALI DESIGNS & EXHIBITS PVT LTD ..... Appellant versus PICO DEEPALI OVERLAYS CONSORTIUM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants versus DEEPALI DESIGNS & EXHIBITS PRIVATE LIMITED Present:-"Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Adv. for Deepali Designs & ..... Respondent Exhibits. Ms. Ginny J.Rautray & Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. for PICO. Ms. Lakshmi Gurung & Ms. Easha Kadian, Advs. for ITD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN RFA(OS)(COMM) 22/2017 & RFA(OS)(COMM) 3/2018 Page 1 of 30 MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. These cross appeals are directed against a judgment dated 18.07.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.S. (Comm.) 1590/2016. The ...
Delhi Coop. Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs.registrar of Co-Operat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 03.2019 $~23. * + % W.P.(C) 2939/2019 DELHI COOP. HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. Through: Mr. S.K. Kaushik, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus REGISTRAR OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.13637/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2939/2019 & C.M. No.13636/2019 1. The petitioner Delhi Coop. Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DCHFCL) has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 13.02.2017 passed by the Delhi Co-opearative Tribunal (DCT) in Appeal No.48/2015/DCT, arising from Arbitration Case No.19/GH/DR/ARB/2014- 15. By the impugned order, the DCT has dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the award dated 23.03.2015. W.P.(C.) No.2939/2019 Page 1 of 3 2. The petit...
Deepali Designs & Exhibits Pvt Ltd vs.pico Deepali Overlays Consortium ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
$~ * + + 18773-18774/2018, RFA(OS)(COMM) 3/2018 & CM Appl. 7562-7563/2018, 7618-7619/2018, 10570-10571/2019 PICO DEEPALI OVERLAYS CONSORTIUM & ORS. 45489-45490/2018, IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:27. 03.2019 RFA(OS)(COMM) 22/2017 & CM Appl. 42543/2017 & 2903-2904/2019 DEEPALI DESIGNS & EXHIBITS PVT LTD ..... Appellant versus PICO DEEPALI OVERLAYS CONSORTIUM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants versus DEEPALI DESIGNS & EXHIBITS PRIVATE LIMITED Present:-"Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Adv. for Deepali Designs & ..... Respondent Exhibits. Ms. Ginny J.Rautray & Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. for PICO. Ms. Lakshmi Gurung & Ms. Easha Kadian, Advs. for ITD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN RFA(OS)(COMM) 22/2017 & RFA(OS)(COMM) 3/2018 Page 1 of 30 MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. These cross appeals are directed against a judgment dated 18.07.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.S. (Comm.) 1590/2016. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »