Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamruddin Sheikh @ Sameer vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 171/2019 KAMRUDDIN SHEIKH @ SAMEER versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Ms. Shilpa Goel and Ms. Heena, Advs. For the Respondent: Ms.Meenankshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Neeraj Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.334/2017 under Sections 457/380/120-B/34 of the IPC, Police Station Prasad Nagar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that a factory, where gold jewellery was manufactured, was broken into on the intervening night of 19.10.2017 and 20.10.2017 and the theft was discovered on the following morning at about 11.00 AM.3. As per the prosecution, CCTV footage and finger prints lifted from the spot led to discovery of involvement of two of the co- BAIL APPLN.171/2019 Page 1 of 3 accused.4. As ...
Union of India and Anr vs.d.l. Khillan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of order: March 28, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5700/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain & Ms.Rabiya Thakur, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus D.L. KHILLAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) ORDER1 The Central Government and the Airports Authority of India (AAI) prefer this writ petition, questioning a decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal, directing that the pension fixation in respect of the respondent should be in accordance with the instructions and guidelines applicable prior to the Office Memorandum (OM) issued on 19.09.2003; their contention is that the principles contained in that OM would apply to the respondents.2. The National Airports Authority (NAA) came into existence w.e.f. 01.06.1986, when the Central Government employees started working in the Directorate General of Civil Aviation/Civil A...
Rajesh Khatri & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1642/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6565/2019 RAJESH KHATRI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhimanyu, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Usha Devi. Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.180/2012, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Mundka, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 30th January, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by W/SI Usha Devi on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved vide aforesaid affidavit ...
M/S Delhi Transport Corporation vs.jasbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~09. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 03.2019 W.P.(C) 3451/2017 M/S DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Purvesh Buttan with Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Advs. versus JASBIR SINGH Through: Mr. Parmod Kumar with Mr. Amod ..... Respondent Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) assails the order dated 24.10.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.100/3760/2013. The Tribunal has allowed the said Original Application preferred by the respondent and set aside the show cause notice dated 21.12.2012, termination order dated 04.01.2013, and the appellate orders dated 18.03.2013 and 31.07.2013 issued by the petitioner. The Tribunal has directed reinstatement of the W.P.(C.) No.3451/2017 Page 1 of 4 respondent with 50 % back wages.2. The respondent was appointed as a...
Mahesh Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1637/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6558/2019 MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Harender Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.150/2016, under Sections 498-A/4& 174-A of IPC, registered at police station Farsh Bazar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 16th March, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by with ASI Harender on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties now stands settled and she is living happily...
M/S Jaihind Projects Ltd vs.gail (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 88/2019 + M/S JAIHIND PROJECTS LTD. Date of Decision:28. 03.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.K. Kapur with Mr. Bhushan Kapur, Advocates along with Mr. Chetan Tolani, Attorney Holder. GAIL (INDIA) LTD. versus Through: Ms. Madhumita ..... Respondent Bhattacharya, CORAM: Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) Briefly, via this petition injunction is sought vis-a-vis two bank 1. guarantees which are referred to in prayer Clause (i) and (ii) of this petition. For the sake of convenience, the same are extracted hereunder:-"i) Contract Performance Bank Guarantee No.BGH/2018 dated 15.06.2016 [Sic:2018]. for a sum of Rs.3.00 Crores (Rupees Three Crores only) issued by Central Bank of India, Lal Darwaja Branch Post Box 100, Lal Darwaja, Ahmadabad-380001. Contract No.01389BGK1800001 dated 15.06.2018 for a sum of Rs.79,23,469/- (Rupees Seventy Nine lakhs Twenty Three Thousand Four Hundred Sixty...
Federation of Educational Publishers in India vs.directorate of Educat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:27. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 13143/2018 & CM No.51010/2018 FEDERATION OF EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHERS IN INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Ms. Aayushi Sharma and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. K. Tripathi, ASC (GNCTD) with Mr. Rishabh Ostwal and Mr. Shashank Tiwari, Advs. for Govt. of NCT of Delhi Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Pawan Pathak, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT1 On 29th November, 2018, the Directorate of Education, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the DoE), issued a Circular, which forms the subject matter of controversy in the present writ petition. The Circular primarily addressed the concern of school children, in primary and secondary schools, having to carry school bags which were W.P.(C) 13143/201...
Ravinder vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 337/2019 Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2019 RAVINDER STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Ajay Burman, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Tanya Harnal, Ms. Sadhvi Gaur and Mr.Sahil Verma, Advs. For the Respondent : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with Insp.Yogendra Kumar, P.S.EOW. Mr.Ashok Arora, Mr.Rajeshwar Dagar and Mr.Nagender Deswal, Advs. for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.275/2017 under Sections 419/420/477A, Police Station: Sector 23 Dwarka, (South West). The investigation now stands transferred to Police Station: Economic Offences Wing.2. Allegations in the FIR, which was registered on the complaint of the Administrator, appointed by the Government, are that he noticed unauthorised withdrawal of monies of the society and payment to several ind...
Sushil Kumar & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Dlehi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 27, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1600/2019 & Crl.M.As. 6395-96/2019 SUSHIL KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Yogeshwar Gaur, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DLEHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Karan Pal Mr. Vikas Dahiya, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.105/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Hauz Khas, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 18th January, 2018 (Annexure P-3) and affidavit of 28th February, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by with SI Karan Pal on the basis of identity proof produced by her....
m.k. Singh vs.chancellor, Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12030/2015 Date of decision:27. h March, 2019 M.K. SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with versus Mr. M. K. Singh, Adv. CHANCELLOR, RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN & ORS. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC and ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Manisha Saroha, Advs. for R-1,6 & 7. Mr. Shibashisk Misra, Adv. for R-3. Mr. R. Venkatramani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gyan Prakash, Adv. for R-2 & 4. Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.(ORAL) The petitioner, M.K. Singh challenges the appointment of respondent No.2/Professor P.N. Shastry as Vice-Chancellor of respondent No.3/Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan (hereinafter the Sanskrit Sansthan) by way of a writ of quo warranto and seeks his removal from office. It is the petitioners contention that Professor P.N. Shastry (Professor P.N. Shastri) was appointed in violation of the UGC ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »