Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Bank of Patiala vs.m/s Gabs and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~06. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2220/2016 STATE BANK OF PATIALA Through: Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Adv. versus Date of Decision:07. 03.2019 ........ Petitioner M/S GABS AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Vinny Shangloo, adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.10584/2019 We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. For the reasons stated in the application and the explanation furnished, we waive of the costs imposed upon the petitioner vide our order dated 14.02.2019 both in the W.P. (C) No.2220/2016 & W.P. (C) No.10998/2016. W.P.(C) 2220/2016 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 04.11.2015, passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Delhi in Appeal No.332/2015, arising out of O.A. No.79/2005 (Delhi-I). By the impugned order the W.P.(C.) No.2220/2016 Page 1 of 8 Appellate Tribunal has rejected the said appeal preferred by the petitioner bank.2. The petitioner had pre...
Satender Singh Nakoti vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"07th March, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3720/2018 SATENDER SINGH NAKOTI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Amrit Pal Kaur, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with SI Rajeshwar Second respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to Jai Inder singh, son of the petitioner, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 02.10.2006. Out of their cohabitation, a female child named Pearl was born on 12.10.2007. On 12.11.2014, the second respondent lodged first information report (FIR) no.547/2014 with police station Palam Village, South West Delhi, alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband and his father (the petitioner). On conclusion of the investigation, police filed report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P...
Damont Developers Pvt. Ltd Through Its Authorised Signatory vs.brys Ho ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~ * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 837/2018 Date of Decision:07. h March, 2019 DAMONT DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil K. Kher, Senior Advocate with Mr.D.R. Bhatia, Ms.Vasundhara Nayyar, Mr.Kunal Kher, Advocates. versus BRYS HOTELS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.K. Datta, Mr.Rahul Malhotra, Advocates. JUDGMENT The petitioner is seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.2. The arbitration agreement between the parties is contained in Clause 10 (e) of the MOU dated 17th September, 2016 which is reproduced hereunder: 10. General Terms and Conditions e. In case of any dispute, parties have agreed that, Transferee had the right to appoint a neutral third party as arbitrator and all arbitration proceedings shall be in accordance with the provisions of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Place of arbitration shall take place be New Delhi...
Comandant Ranjeet Singh Rana vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 213/2016 Through: Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioner COMANDANT RANJEET SINGH RANA UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr. A.K. Rai, Advocate. % CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER0703.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The... Petitioner by way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the down grading of his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the year 2013-14 and seeks consequential reliefs. Brief Facts 2. Shorn of unnecessary facts, be it noted that the... Petitioner joined Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) on 10th December 1991 as Assistant Commandant (earlier known as Company Commander). He was promoted to the rank of Commandant in the year 2008 and took over command of 37 Bn. The next promotional post is DIG and in order to be eligible for consideration, one needs benchmark grading of 7.... Pet...
Union of India & Ors vs.satish Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07.03.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.1817/2019 and CM Nos.8501/2019 and 8594/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Mahender Kr.Bhardwaj Mr.K.C.Dubey, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR Through: Mr.U.Srivastava, Advocate. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1.2. By the instant writ petition preferred under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek setting aside of the order dated 07.02.2017 in OA No.164/2000 and order dated 01.05.2018 in RA No.159/2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, in short 'CAT'. Concisely, the relevant facts are that the respondent, who was appointed by the petitioners as Supervisor Apprentice on 01.02.1967, during the course of his employment completed Section A of AMIE Course on 23.07.1978. On the completion of such course, the respondent W.P.(C.) No.1817/2019 Page 1...
Naveen Aggarwal & Anr. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1256/2019 NAVEEN AGGARWAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: Dr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public .....Respondents Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Manish Vashisht, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.4943/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1256/2019 Quashing of FIR No.67/2011, under Sections 452/3etc. of IPC registered at police station Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi and trial court order of 29th May, 2017 vide which petitioners have been summoned under Sections 451/323/341/5of IPC, is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 4th February, 2019 and on the ground that misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Dr. M.P.Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for CRL.M.C. 1256/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent-Sta...
Uni Air Cargo Pvt Ltd vs.sharons Link Logistics and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 708/2016 UNI AIR CARGO PVT LTD Through: Mr. Dhruv Tamta, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pranav Sapra, Adv. SHARONS LINK LOGISTICS AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0703.2019 IA No.12613/2018 (of the defendants under Order XIIIA of the CPC as applicable to commercial suits) 1. The defendants in this suit for recovery of Rs.1,00,28,089/- comprising of principal amount of Rs.49,70,684/- and pre-suit interest at 24% per annum of Rs.50,57,405/-, with future interest, seek summary dismissal of the suit.2. This application came up first before this Court on 17th September, 2018 when notice thereof was ordered to be issued and opportunity given to file reply within four weeks thereof.3. No reply was filed and when the suit and the application came up before this Court on 13th December, 2018, none appeared for the plaintiff. However, the counsel for the defendants informed that the ...
Vikas Shah vs.state ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 552/2019 VIKAS SHAH ........ Petitioner versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Jyoti Gupta with Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Jaibir Singh, PS Geeta Colony. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.4725/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 552/2019 1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.2. With the consent of the parties, matter is taken up for disposal today itself.3.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.146/2014 under Sections 354/354A IPC and Sections 8 and 12 POCSO, Police Station Geeta BAIL APPLN. 552/2019 Page 1 of 3 Colony.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner was enlarged on bail by order dated...
Ashwani Daggar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 06, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1233/2019 and CRL.M.A. 4822-4823/2019 ASHWANI DAGGAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Singh, Mr. Raj Pareek, Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta and Mr. Abhitosh Pratap Singh, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public for State with SI Prosecutor Davender Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.42/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Chhawala, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 7th September, 2017 (Annexure-B) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State, submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Davender on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submi...
Gaurav Jhamb & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2019
$~45 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"6th March, 2019 Crl.M.C. 4747/2018 & Crl.M.A. 32329/2018 GAURAV JHAMB & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Tyagi, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Badlu Ram, PS Janak Puri. Mr. Piyush Jain, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 19.02.2014. They parted ways w.e.f 17.05.2015. On 13.07.2015, at the instance of the second respondent, first information report (FIR) No.829/2015 was registered by police station Janak Puri, alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (first petitioner), his father (second petitioner), his mother (third petitioner) and his sisters (fourth and fifth petitioners herein), the name of third sister Divya Jhamb having bee...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »