Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Rashmi Raj vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~4 & 61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Decision :8. h March, 2019 W.P.(C) 1286/2019 & CM Nos.5801-03/2019 DR. SUNNY AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Gyan Parkash, Adv. for R-1 to 3. W.P.(C) 2361/2019 & CM Nos.11019-20/2019 DR. RASHMI RAJ ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Gyan Parkash, Adv. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice to the respondents in W.P.(C)No.2361/2019.2. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Central Government Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3. W.P.(C)Nos.1286/2019 & 2361/2019 Page 1 of 6 W.P.(C)No.2361/2019 is identical with W.P.(C)No.1286/2019. Learned counsel agree that the or...
Bharat Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Lakhotia Nursery Trust vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Sh Amit Miglani vs.mr. Dinesh Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
F-74 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3433/2015 & I.A.No.14136/2016 SH AMIT MIGLANI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Rajesh Bhatia with Mr.Hitesh Khanna and Mr.Shivam, Advocates. versus MR. DINESH CHAUDHARY ..... Defendants Through Ex parte Date of Decision:08. h March, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 3,45,00,000/- (Rupees Three Crore Forty Five Lacs only) against the defendant, alleging that the defendant had entered into a Bayana Agreement dated 25th July, 2012, claiming himself to be the sole and absolute owner of the Suit Property bearing Plot No.112-113, area measuring 500 sq. yds. part of Khasra No.11/21, situated in the area of Village Nilothi Colony, known as Nihal Vihar, Block R, Nangloi, New Delhi. It is stated that the plaintiff had paid a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lacs Only) to the defendant in cash on CS (OS) 3433/2015 Page 1 of 6 25th July,...
Siri Chand vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2019. LA.APP. 333/2014 SIRI CHAND Through: Mr. H.M. Singh, Adv. ..... Appellant UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs. K.K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advs. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 On 17th July, 2018, after hearing the counsels the following order was passed: 1. This proceeding, though was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, was vide order dated 14th July, 2014 converted into this appeal.2. The challenge in this proceeding is to the order dated 7th October, 2011 of dismissal of Execution No.176/2011 preferred by the petitioner / appellant.3. The petitioner / appellant, in the Execution which has been dismissed vide the impugned order, claimed interest on solatium and additional amount in terms of Section 23 (1A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.4. The counsels have been heard.5. What eme...
Dharampal & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1189/2019 and Crl.M.A. 4643/2019 DHARAMPAL & ORS Through: Mr. Mahesh Verma, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.07/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Jaffarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 1st August, 2017 (Annexure P-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State, submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolve...
Prakash Gupta vs.state ( Nct of Delhi )
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2552/2018 PRAKASH GUPTA versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Rebecca John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Bora and Mr. Sideshwar Rai, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Rohit Kumar, PS Vasant Kunj. Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Mr. Sachit Arora, Mr. Khurram Salim, Mr. Shubhamshree, Ms. Barkha Rastogi, Mr. Shekhar Pathak and Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Advocates for the complainant. Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Spl. P.P. for CBI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Status report has been received from Director, CFSL, CBI. In view thereof, CBI is discharged.2.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.62/2017 under Sections 4IPC. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant had handed over 6 kilograms of gold to the petitioner and the p...
Yogender Jha vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~29 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:07. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C).11845/2018 YOGENDER JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naushad Alam, Advocate Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Satyakam, ASC, GNCTD along with Asstt. Engineer Mr. J.C. Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL458582018(stay) 1. The applicant/petitioner, who is 79 years of age, has filed the present writ petition, seeking the following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or other suitable writ or order or direction thereby quashing/setting aside the letter/order(Annexure-P-5) issued by respondent no.4; (ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or other suitable writ or order or direction thereby directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to run the tea stall at Main Rohtak Road-Service Lane(in front of F-5, Udyog Nagar, New Delhi); W.P.(C).11845/2018 Page 1...
Gma First India (P) Ltd India vs.genius Mind Consultancy Sdn Bhd & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h March, 2018 CS(COMM) 297/2016, IA Nos. 4214/2018 (u/O IX R-7 CPC), 4215/2018 (for condonation of 428 days delay in filing IA No.4214/2018), 4216/2018(for condonation of 62 days delay in re- filing IA No.4214/2018), 4448/2018(u/O.VIII R.1 CPC) GMA FIRST INDIA (P) LTD INDIA Through: Mr. Vaibhav Arora, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus GENIUS MIND CONSULTANCY SDN BHD & ORS.. Defendants Through: Mr. Deepak Agarwal, Mr. S.Santanam Swaminadhan & Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Advs. for D-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 On 22nd February, 2019, the following order was passed:-"1. The plaintiff instituted the present suit (i) to restrain the defendants No.1&2 from publishing defamatory information relating to the plaintiff on their website and from entering into direct agreements or arrangements with defendant No.3 or any franchisee / sub-franchisee of the plaintiff; (ii) for declaration that the termination dated 27th No...
Shobha Rani and Anr vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8534/2017 Date of Decision :07. 03.2019 SHOBHA RANI AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. T.D. Yadav, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra and Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the 1. order dated 30.03.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (Tribunal) in OA No.4452/2014. The petitioners have preferred the said Original Application to challenge the speaking order dated 29.05.2014 passed by the respondents, in compliance of the directions issued by the Tribunal in O.A. No.3702/2012. The directions issued by the Tribunal in O.A. No.3702/2012 read as follows: 3. In the circumstances, the OA is disposed of with a direction to respondents to pass a speaking order mentioning therein the details of all su...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »