Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Dharampal Through: His Gpa Smt. Anjali Gopalan vs.govt. Of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Harsh Vardhan Sarda vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Cvcigp Ii Client Rosehill Limited and Others vs.sanjay Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:8. h March, 2019 O.M.P. 172/2012 CVCIGP II CLIENT ROSEHILL LIMITED AND OTHERS Through: None ........ Petitioners versus SANJAY JAIN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. T. Sharma & Ms. P. Mehta, Advocates (M-9910445771) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(oral) I.A. 3443/2019 in O.M.P. 172/2012 1. Ld. Counsel for the... RESPONDENTS submits that she has served a copy of the application to the Ld. Counsel for the... Petitioners. A perusal of the notice of motion filed with the application shows that there is an endorsement by the counsels for the... Petitioners and service has been executed on 5th March, 2019. However, none appears for the... Petitioners.2. The... Petitioners had filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, Act) seeking interim relief. Vide order dated 1st May, 2012, interim protection was gr...
Jasraaj Singh vs.government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Dr. Sunny and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~4 & 61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Decision :8. h March, 2019 W.P.(C) 1286/2019 & CM Nos.5801-03/2019 DR. SUNNY AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Gyan Parkash, Adv. for R-1 to 3. W.P.(C) 2361/2019 & CM Nos.11019-20/2019 DR. RASHMI RAJ ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Gyan Parkash, Adv. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice to the respondents in W.P.(C)No.2361/2019.2. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Central Government Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3. W.P.(C)Nos.1286/2019 & 2361/2019 Page 1 of 6 W.P.(C)No.2361/2019 is identical with W.P.(C)No.1286/2019. Learned counsel agree that the or...
Chaman Lal Arora vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Satbir Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1296/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5142/2019 SATBIR SINGH Through: Mr. Junais Padalath & Mr.Prashant ........ Petitioner Kulambhi, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with ASI Kamal Singh Mr. Jugendra, respondent No.2 & prosecutrix in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.99/2018, under Section 363 IPC, registered at police station Kapashera, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 5th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, who is the first-informant/ complainant of FIR in question and prosecutrix, who is daughter of second respondent and wife of pet...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr. Vs.mukesh Kumar Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 03.2019 W.P.(C) 10007/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. N. K. Singh, Adv. for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD (Services). versus MUKESH KUMAR YADAV ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raman Duggal, Mr. Qjuysa Joshi, Mr. A.K. Panwar and Mr. Akshay Choudhary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi assails the order dated 11.05.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (Tribunal) in OA No.2961/2016.2. The Tribunal had allowed the said OA preferred by the respondent and quashed the order dated 01.08.2016. By the order dated 01.08.2016, the petitioners had declared the result for the recruitment held for the post of Head Constable in Transport Department of Govt. of NCT of Delhi, and the W.P.(C) 10007/2018 Page 1 of 5 respondent was not declared as successful, even ...
Arvinder Kaur Sethi vs.dilkhush Industrial Estate Welfare Association ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~51 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 376/2019 & CM APPL. 10077/2019 Date of Decision:08. 03.2019 ARVINDER KAUR SETHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. G.S. Raghav, Advocate. versus DILKHUSH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REG) & ORS ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Mehta, Mr. B.S. Tiwari & Mr. Sanchit Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CAV2202019 Learned counsel for the caveator is present and has been heard. The caveat thus, stands discharged. CM(M) 376/2019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 21.01.2019 of the learned Trial Court of the Court of the ADJ-02 (North) Rohini Courts in CS (DJ) No.59737/2016, vide which an application under Order VII CM (M) 376/2019 Page 1 of 23 Rule 11 of the CPC filed on behalf of the defendant no.6 to the said suit arrayed as the petitioner to the present petition was declined. Through the submissions that have been made on behalf of the petitio...
M/S Mnp Interconnection Telecom Solutions India Private Limited vs.tel ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 10.2018 Pronounced on:08. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 1507/2018 & CM APPL.Nos.61& 258SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. C.S. Vaidyarathan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jafar Alam, Mr.Vishal Binod, Mr. Saahil Kaul & Mr.Anirudh Gupta, Advs. versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arjan Natarajan, Adv. for R-1 Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr.Kashish Bajaj, Adv. for R-2 + W.P.(C) 1508/2018 & CM APPL.Nos.61& 301M/S MNP INTERCONNECTION TELECOM SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Neerav Merchant, Ms. Ujjal Banerjee & Mr. Akash Khurana, Advs. versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arjan Natarajan, Adv. for R-1 Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr.Kashish Bajaj, Adv. for R-2 W.P.(C) 1507 & 1508 of 2018 Page 1 of 26 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE ...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »