Skip to content

Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 08 2019

Sachin Garg & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 08, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1281/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5082/2019 SACHIN GARG & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Tandon, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Sandeep Kumar Mr. Tarun Diwan, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.842/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Vasant Kunj, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 12th March, 2018 between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State, submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sandeep Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute b...


Mar 08 2019

Escorts Limited vs.tejpal Singh Sisodia

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2019. CS(OS) 139/2019 ESCORTS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gyanendra Kumar with Ms. Shikha Tandon & Mr. Robin Grover, Advs. Versus Through: None. TEJPAL SINGH SISODIA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.3417/2019(for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. .....Defendant 2. Application stands disposed of. IA No.3416/2019(u/S.149 CPC) 3. Accepting the undertaking of the counsel for the plaintiff that the court fees shall be deposited within one week, the time for filing court fess is extended by one week.4. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) 139/2019, IA No.3414/2019(u/O.XXXIX R-1 & 2 CPC) & IA No.3415/2019(u/O.II R.2(3) CPC) 5. The Registry to list the suit, if the deficient court fees is not filed within one week as undertaken. CS(OS) 139/2019 Page 1 of 20 6. The plaintiff having its registered office at Faridabad, Haryana has instituted this suit against the defendant...


Mar 08 2019

Pushpa Sharma vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........


Mar 08 2019

Dr. Mehmoda Ahmed vs.government of National Capital Territory of Delhi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........


Mar 08 2019

Malvika Mohatta vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........


Mar 08 2019

Hifzur Rehman & Ors. Vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 08, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1284/2019 HIFZUR REHMAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ramesh & Mr. V.S.Chauhan, Advocates Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Parveen Kumar Mr. A.A.Khan, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 5094/2019 Delay of 25 days in re-filing the accompanying petition is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 1284/2019 & Crl.M.As. 5092-93/2019 Quashing of FIR No.43/2012, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, registered at police station Khajuri Khas, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 27th April, 2017 reached between the parties. Counsel for petitioner submits that the mediated settlement has CRL.M.C. 1284/2019 Page 1 of 3 been acted upon ...


Mar 08 2019

Rajesh Kondira Bhonsle & Anr. Vs.kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:8. h March, 2019 + O.M.P. 729/2012 RAJESH KONDIRA BHONSLE & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Atul B. Dakh, Advocate. versus (M:9868602496) KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kaushik Mishra, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, Advocates. (M:8800149595) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, Act) has been filed challenging the award dated 15th October, 2011 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator against the... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kondira Bhonsle (hereinafter, Mr. Bhonsle) and Mr. Indrajeet Rajesh Bhonsle.2. The background of the dispute is that Mr. Bhonsle had made a booking of Flat No.106 admeasuring 930 sq.ft. built-up area, on first floor, Bunch Berry-A, Yari Road, Versova, Andheri (West), Mumbai, through M/s. H. K. Builders (hereinafter Builder). He applied for a home...


Mar 08 2019

Gurpreet Singh Rakhi @ Michal vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C.2926/2016 Decided on:-"8th March, 2019 GURPREET SINGH RAKHI @ MICHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Misra & Mr. Anant Misra, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State. Mr. Anupam S. Sharma & Mr. Prakash Airan, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing trial as accused in sessions case (SC No.58925/2016) in the court of Additional Sessions Judge on the charge for offences punishable under Sections 376/313/506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the same having been framed on 23.05.2016 on the basis of evidence which was presented with the report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.759/2015 of police station KN Katju Marg.2. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was submitted with the following pra...


Mar 08 2019

Champai Munda vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 294/2019 CHAMPAI MUNDA versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Abhijeet Bhagat, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Ajay Kumar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks Regular bail in FIR No.712/2016 under SectionsIPC, Police Station Rajouri.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix were brought to Delhi by her sister-in-law and left with the petitioner, who was to find employment for her. It is alleged that petitioner had sent the prosecutrix to a particular house but she did not like the work there and she complained to the petitioner and thereafter she was sent to another house where also she was not happy with her job and when she complained to the petitioner, he is alleged to have taken her back BAIL APPLN...


Mar 08 2019

Shri Keshav Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial