Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 11 2019

Vifor (International) Ltd vs.suven Life Sciences Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2019

$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1680/2016 VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Vaishali Mittal and Mr. Rohin Kootwal, Advs. Versus SUVEN LIFE SCIENCES LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H., Mr. Tahir A.J.and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Ms. Saif Rahman Ansari, Advs. ORDER1103.2019 % IA No.3552/2019 (of plaintiff u/O XI R-1 CPC for filing additional documents) 1. Though the Legislature, by enacting the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, intended expeditious disposal of suits which qualify as a commercial suits thereunder, but it is found that in most of the commercial suits, applications as this, for delayed filing of documents or for condonation of delay in taking requisite steps in such suits, are being filed and which were envisaged by the Commercial Courts Act when fixing the timelines for disposal of such cases, to be an exception rather than norm.2. The effort to expedite, endeavoured by the Commerc...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2019

Amit Khattar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2019

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 11, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1308/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5188/2019 AMIT KHATTAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Malhotra, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional ........ RESPONDENTS Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Mohd. Kafeel Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.214/2016, under Sections 498-A/4IPC, registered at police station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of joint statement of parties recorded before the trial court on 19th January, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Mohd. Kafeel on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2019

Balvinder Kaur & Ors vs.state & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2019

$~10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"11th March, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4603/2016 and Crl. M.A. 19242/2016 BALVINDER KAUR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Kashyap, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with ASI Prem Ram Arya CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The fourth petitioner was a tenant in house no.50/2015, third floor, Ashok Nagar, New Delhi-110018, the second respondent being the landlord, the former using the said premises for residence of self and other members of the family which included his mother (first petitioner), his maternal uncle (third petitioner), wife of the said maternal uncle (second petitioner), son of the said petitioner (fifth petitioner). Some dispute arose between the landlord and tenant and became subject matter of civil litigation (Civil suit no.221/2008), the said suit having been decreed in favour of the second respondent (complainant). Eventually, in t...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2019

Keshav Kumar (Huf) vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2019