Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Achilesh Nigam and Ors vs.ministry of Labour and Employment Directorat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~16. * + % W.P.(C) 794/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 03.2019 ........ Petitioner ACHILESH NIGAM AND ORS Through: Mr. Anuj Bhandari with Mr. Abhinav versus Srivastava, Advs. MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING GOVERNMENT ..... Respondent OF INDIA AND ANR Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain with Mr. Raghav Dhanda, Advs. Mr. Manish Sharma, SSO, R-2 Mr. Amit Jenewal, ASO, R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners assail the order dated 14.10.2015, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.4620/2011. The Tribunal has, by the impugned order, rejected the said Original Application preferred by the petitioners. The petitioners had preferred the said Original Application to seek the following reliefs: (a) Issue directions to the... RESPONDENTS for placing the Applicants in the upgraded r...
Suman Devi vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:11. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 4472/2018 & CM APPL. 17242/2018 SUMAN DEVI Through: Mr. Sanket Gupta, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nitya Rao & Mr. Shekhar Vyas, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner claims to be regular tehbazari holder of site 17349 situated at site No.47, measuring 7 X5(covered), at Bapu Market, Gandhi Maidan, Chandani Chowk, Delhi. The petitioner received a notice dated 24.04.2018, which was handed over by the officials of the Respondent to one person in Bapu Market on 25.04.2018, from whom petitioner collected the notice on 26.04.2018, calling upon her to vacate the tehbazari site by 30.04.2018, and take possession of site No.21 at Mata Sundari Road, Delhi, failing which eviction action would be taken by the Department.2. The petitioner has filed this...
Arvind Yadav vs.harish Kumar Bhalla & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~6 * + ARVIND YADAV HARISH KUMAR BHALLA & ANR CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 103/2018 & CM APPL. 19988/2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Raman Duggal with Mr.Akshay versus Chaudhary, Mr.Arun K.Panwar & Mr.Ojusya Joshi, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jitender Chaudhary, Advocate for R1. % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1103.2019 1. This is an appeal against an order dated 17th April 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in OA21of 2018 in CS (COMM) 22 of 2015 upholding an order dated 30th January 2018 passed by the Joint Registrar (JR) dismissing the Appellants application IA11489of 2016 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment.2. The facts in brief are that on 21st March 2013 a Collaboration Agreement (CA) was executed between Mr. Harish Kumar Bhalla (hereafter referred to as the owner) and Mr. Mannu Talwar (hereafter referred to as the builder) in terms of which the owner pooled in his plot of land and t...
Jaspal Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1305/2019 Date of Order: March 11, 2019 JASPAL SINGH Through: Mr. Mukesh Birla, Advocate .....Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor with SI Devendar Singh Respondent No 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.5183/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 5184/2019 (delay) There is delay of 85 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 1305/2019 Quashing of FIR No.188/2016, under Sections 354/354B/509 of IPC registered at police station Govind Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 14th February, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands CRL.M.C. 1305/2019 Page 1 of 3 cleared between the parties. Upon noti...
Lichen Metals Private Limited & Anr vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"11th March, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1128/2016 and Crl.M.A.1827/2016, 2676/2016 and 10219/2016 LICHEN METALS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ....... Petitioner Through Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kailash Pandey, Mr.Ranjeet Singh, Ms.Nuur Sharma, Advocates versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION..... Respondent Through Mr.Narender Mann, Spl.PP for CBI with Mr.Manoj Pant, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first petitioner i.e. M/s Lichen Metals Private Limited (LMPL) is described as a group of companies of M/s Edelweiss Commodities Services Ltd., which had been a business associate, since 2008, of State Trading Corporation (STC), an entity controlled by the Government of India. The second petitioner has been concededly connected to M/s Edelweiss Commodities Services Ltd and also authorized by LMPL to sign documents on its behalf.2. Upon consideration of the evidence oral and documentary as submitted with the...
Nayan Nandi vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~3 & 19 * + + W.P.(C) 9345/2018 NAYAN NANDI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber & Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6094/2018 KALAWATI THAKUR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber & Mr. Bhanu versus Gupta, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Soumava Karmakar, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law & Mr. Deepak Kumar, SI, CRPF. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh with Mr. Kavindra Gill, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1103.2019 1. These two petitions arise out of a common set of facts and seek similar W.P.(C) 6094/2018 & 9345/2018 Page 1 of 21 relief. They are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The central issue in both petitions is whether the... Petitioners who joined the Cen...
Padamjit Singh Ahluwalia vs.paramjit Singh Ahluwalia and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 541/2018 & IAs No.14618/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 2698/2019 (of D-2 u/O I R-10 CPC) PADAMJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Adv. with plaintiff Versus in person. PARAMJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Preeti Singh and Mr. Shivam CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Jaiswal, Advs. ORDER1103.2019 The counsel for the plaintiff and the counsel for the defendants % 1. No.1&2 have been heard.2. The counsel for the plaintiff states that a preliminary decree for partition of property No.A-39, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi can be passed forthwith.3. It is argued, (i) that the subject property belonged to Sangat Singh, who was the paternal grandfather of the plaintiff as well as the defendant No.1; (ii) that the defendant No.2 Geeta Bhalla Singh is the wife of the defendant No.1; (iii) that Sangat Singh died intestate leaving only two sons i.e. Tarlochan Singh, father of the plai...
Kalawati Thakur and Ors. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~3 & 19 * + + W.P.(C) 9345/2018 NAYAN NANDI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber & Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6094/2018 KALAWATI THAKUR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber & Mr. Bhanu versus Gupta, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Soumava Karmakar, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law & Mr. Deepak Kumar, SI, CRPF. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh with Mr. Kavindra Gill, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1103.2019 1. These two petitions arise out of a common set of facts and seek similar W.P.(C) 6094/2018 & 9345/2018 Page 1 of 21 relief. They are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The central issue in both petitions is whether the... Petitioners who joined the Cen...
Manish Sharma & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 11, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 22/2019 MANISH SHARMA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Goswami, Advocate Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Amit Kumar Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1147/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Kalyanpuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 11th April, 2018 (Annexure-B) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State, submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Amit Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties ha...
Bapu Market Association vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~13 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:11. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 4596/2018 & CM APPL. 17760, 27817/2018 & CRL.M.A. 12728/2018 BAPU MARKET ASSOCIATION Through: Mr. Ravinder Tyagi, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The petitioners claim to be the members of the petitioner association.1. They also claim to be regular Teh-bazari holders of Kiosks at Bapu Market, Gandhi Maidan, Chandani Chowk, Delhi. The members of the petitioner association received a notice dated 24.04.2018 calling upon them to vacate the Teh-bazari sites by 30.04.2018 failing which eviction action would be taken by the Department.2. The members of the petitioner association have filed this writ petition seeking the following prayers: a) Kindly issue a Writ Of Mandamus Or Any Other Ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »