Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
De Lage Landen Financial Services India Private Limited vs.evan Multis ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 393/2018, IA No.10632/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-6 CPC) DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Pratiti Rungta, Adv. along with Jay Prakash Singh, AR of the plaintiff. EVAN MULTISPECIALITY HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE PVT. LTD. & ORS. Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shadwali Singh, Adv. for D- 1,2,3,4,6,9,10&11. Mr. Piyush Singhal, Adv. for D-5&8. Mr. Vivek Gupta, Adv. for D-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1203.2019 The plaintiff has sued the 11 defendants viz. (i) Evan Multispeciality % 1. Hospital & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., (ii) Ravinder Kumar Sahni, (iii) Raj Bahadur Singh, (iv) Rakesh Khurana, (v) Hardesh Kumar, (vi) Pankaj Jain, (vii) Anuradha Aggarwal, (viii) Shivi Agnihotri, (ix) Pramod Kumar, (x) Saurabh Singh, and, (xi) Dr. Preeti Sharma, for a) recovery of Rs.3,00,67,309/- along with future interest; and, b) permanent injunction restraining the said defendant...
Birendra Bhadur S. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
W.P.(C) 3502/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 16 + BIRENDRA BHADUR S. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. Through: Mr Sanjeev Uniyal with Mr Dhawal Uniyal, Advocates for UOI/R-1 to 3. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER1103.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge in the present petition is to an order dated 16th March, 2017 passed by the Senior Commandant, in the Office of the Additional Director General, Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), removing the... Petitioner, who was working as a Constable, from service. The challenge is also to the subsequent order dated 12th September, 2017 passed by the Appellate Authority (AA) confirming the aforementioned order and to an order dated 4th January, 2018 passed by the Revisional Authority dismissing the revision petition filed by the... Petitioner.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner had applied for the post of Co...
Dinesh Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 11, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3639/2017 DINESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Mukherjee, Advocate Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Sandeep Mr. Mahavir Sharma & Mr. K.P.Singh, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1011/2015, registered at police Station Begumpur, Delhi and charge-sheet filed under SectionsIPC against petitioner and the summoning order of 17th March, 2017 is assailed in this petition on the ground of double jeopardy.... Petitioners counsel submits that regarding incident of 20th January, 2013, respondent-complainant had lodged an FIR No.296/2013 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC and in the said FIR, there were no allegations constituting offence under Section 354 IPC against petitioner and trial in the said FIR case is still pending. ...
In the Matter of Vidhata Electronics Private Limited (In Members’ Vo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~CP-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:11. 03.2019 + CO.PET. 7/2019 IN THE MATTER OF VIDHATA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED (IN MEMBERS VOL. LIQN.) Petitioner Through Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. for the OL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Section 497(6) of The Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking voluntary winding up of the Company VIDHATA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED (in members Voluntary Liquidation) (herein referred to as the said company).2. A perusal of the petition shows that the said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act on 10.07.2002 having Corporate Identity Number U32109DL2002PTC116143 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana (ROC), having authorized share capital of Rs. 25 lakhs divided into 2,50,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/-. The Paid up capital of the said company was Rs. 23.20 lakhs divided 2,32,000 e...
Relaxo Footwears Limited vs.xs Brands Consultancy Private Limited & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 917/2018 & IAs No.7650/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 11487/2018 (of D-1&3 u/O XI R-1(4) CPC), 11515/2018 (of D-2 u/O I R-10 CPC), 11516/2018 (of D-5 u/O I R-10 CPC), 16352/2018 (of D-2 u/O VIII R-1 CPC), 16353/2018 (of D-5 u/O VIII R-1 CPC) & 187/2019 (for modification of order dated 5th October, 2018) RELAXO FOOTWEARS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Mr. Ayush Sahay and Mr. Akshay Agarwal, Advs. Versus XS BRANDS CONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with ..... Defendants Mr. Ankur Sangal and Ms. Pragya Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % I.A.No.2219/2019 of the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC ORDER1103.2019 1. Plaintiff seeks to enhance the valuation of the present suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction.2. The senior counsel for the defendants, under instructions, has no objection.3. The application is allowed and is...
Anita Roy vs.samir Majumdar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 224/2016 & IA No.3273/2019 (of plaintiff for withdrawal of suit) ANITA ROY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Laxmi Chand, Adv. for plaintiff with plaintiff in person. Versus SAMIR MAJUMDAR & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. S.K. Bhaduri and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advs. for D-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen Gupta and Ms. Nihaarika Jauhari, Advs. for D-2&4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1103.2019 The plaintiff, in this suit for partition of property bearing No.G-1425, % 1. Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi, vide IA No.3273/2019 seeks to withdraw the suit.2. The counsel for the defendants No.2 & 4 i.e. Shipra Chakraborty and Chitra Kapoor contends that this application has been filed to prevent the defendant No.4 Chitra Kapoor from transposing herself as plaintiff in the suit and for which purpose, the application has been filed and which is likely to come up before this Court tomorrow.3. The counsel for the defendant No.1 has argued, (i)...
Union of India & Anr vs.vidhi Awasthi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5052018 & CM Appl.No.35691/2018 (stay) UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC & versus Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates ..... Appellants VIDHI AWASTHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh, Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, Mr. Awnish Kumar Gupta & Mr. Ravish Singh, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1103.2019 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 13th April, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of the Writ Petition (C) No.3652/2018 filed by the Respondent.2. The background facts are that the husband of the Respondent late Shri Vishal Awasthi was a Stenographer in the National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM), Appellant No.2 which is under the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Government of India (Appellant No.1) from 16th February, 2001 onwards. He expired in harness on 5th March, 2014. LPA5052018 Page 1 of 8 3. The NIDM published an advertisem...
Vinay Mehndiratta vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 11, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1318/2019 VINAY MEHNDIRATTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Sharma & Mr. Arun Baali, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional ........ RESPONDENTS Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Pankaj Mr. Kunal Nath, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.63/2019, under Sectionsof IPC registered at police station Kirti Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 7th March, 2019 of respondent No.2/complainant and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Kunal Nath, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits Crl.M.C. 1318/2019 Page 1 of 3 ...
r.b.seth Jessa Ram and Bros Charitable Hospital Trust vs.union of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h March, 2019 CS(OS) 1606/2006, I.A. 9189/2006 (O XXXIX R-1&2), 9193/2006 [S.80(2)]. & 349/2007(O.XXXIX R-4) and 350/2007(O VII R-11) R.B.SETH JESSA RAM AND BROS CHARITABLE HOSPITAL TRUST ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr. Pranay Trivedi, Adv. UNION OF INDIA Versus ..... Defendant Through : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain, Ms. Rashmi Kumari and Mr. Raghav Dhanda, Advs. along with Mr. Rama Krishna, Superintendent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff, as per the amended plaint verified in July, 2017, though the suit was instituted as far back in the year 2006, seeks (i) declaration as illegal and non est of the communication dated 17th August, 2006 of the Ministry of Urban Development, Land and Development Office, New Delhi addressed to the Secretary, R.B. Seth Jessa Ram & Bros. Charitable Trust, of re-entry/cancellation of premises situated at W.E.A. Karol Nagh, New Delhi on failure despite opportunity to cure...
Himmat Singh & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 482/2003 IN THE MATTER OF: Reserved on:21. 1.2019 Date of decision:11. 3.2019 HIMMAT SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Pradeep Chowdhary and Mr. Vikrant Chowdhary, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State. SI Suresh Kumar, P.S. Inderpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The three appellants, who are related to each other, being brothers, have challenged the judgment dated 4.7.2003, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in case FIR No.33/2002 registered against them at P.S. Inderpuri under Section 3IPC whereunder appellant No.1, Himmat Singh @ Mangal has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and the appellant No.2, Rajesh and appellant No.3, Vinod have been convicted under Section 3IPC. The appellants are also aggrieved by the order on sentence dated 4.7.2003 whereunder they have been sentenced to undergo rigo...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »