Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ace Design Ltd. Vs.gaurav Sarup Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h March, 2019. CM(M) No.503/2019 ACE DESIGN LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. G.S. Kannur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nithin Saravanan, Ms. Anurima Singh and Ms. Priyadarshini, Advs. Versus GAURAV SARUP SHARMA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: Mr. Sarvesh Singh, Adv. ..... Respondent This Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 1st June, 2018 in Misc. DJ No.23/2018 of the Court of Additional District Judge-1 (North)]. of dismissal as barred by time of the application filed by the petitioner for initiation of proceedings of Contempt of Court against the respondent Gaurav Sarup Sharma.2. The senior counsel for the petitioner has argued that vide the same order as impugned in this petition an application, filed by M/s. Marshall Machines Private Limited (MMPL) being the plaintiff in the suit from which this proceeding arises, for initiation of Contempt of Court proce...
State vs.joshim
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:14. h March, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:29. h March, 2019 + CRL.LP. 126/2018 STATE ....Appellant Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Raju Yadav, PS Sultan Puri . Versus JOSHIM Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, Advocate.... RESPONDENTCORAM: SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred as 'Cr.P.C.') the State seeks leave to appeal against the order/judgment dated 27.09.2017 passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS), North West District, Rohini Courts, in Sessions Case No.53084/16, whereby the respondent (accused before the Trial Court) was acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 458/380/397/411 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred as 'IPC').2. Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the learned Trial Court, are as under:-"The FIR has been registered on the complaint of Sanja...
Project dir.dep of Rural Devel vs.its Workmen thr.d.p.v.v.i.e.un
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h February, 2019 Date of decision:28. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 17555/2005 PROJECT DIR.DEP OF RURAL DEVEL ..... PETITIONER Through Mr.Rizwan with Mr.Jatin Versus Ghuliani, Advs. ITS WORKMEN THR.D.P.V.V.I.E.UN ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Piyush Sharma, Adv. + W.P.(C) 10994/2006 PROJECT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rizwan with Mr.Jatin Ghuliani, Advs. versus ITS WORKMEN THR. DELHIPRASASAN ..RESPONDENT Through Mr.Piyush Sharma, Adv. + W.P.(C) 4402/2007 PROJECT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT ..... PETITIONER Through Mr.Rizwan with Mr.Jatin Ghuliani, Advs. versus ITS WORKMEN THRU D.P.V.V.I.E.U ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Piyush Sharma, Adv. WP (C) Nos.17555/2005, 10994/2006 & 4402/2007 Page 1 of 27 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J1 The present batch of writ petitions impugn three different but similar Awards passed by the Industrial Tribunal in ID No.45/2001, ID No.63/2003 and ID No.39/2006, and are, th...
Amit Kumar Sinha & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1641/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6564/2019 AMIT KUMAR SINHA & ORS. Through: Mr. Suresh Thakur, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Raj Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.237/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Palam Village, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 7th December, 2017 (Annexure A) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Raj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably r...
S T vs.m K D
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~10 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. 03.2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 55/2017 & CM.APPL122832017 S T M K D ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ankul Chandra Pradhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Baid, Advocate for the appellant along with appellant Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Advocate along with respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Challenge in the present appeal is to the interim order dated 1. 18.11.2016 passed by the Family Court on an application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as HMA) whereby maintenance of Rs.30,000/- per month has been awarded for the school going minor child alongwith the litigation expenses of Rs. 11,000/- to the respondent-wife.2. The brief facts of the case to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 03.12.2003...
Kunwar Pal Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 03.2019 CRL.M.C. 761/2019 KUNWAR PAL SINGH versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Bahri with Ms. Radhika, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with IO. Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.3105/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 761/2019 & Crl.M.A.3104/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.1533/2014 under Sections 341/5IPC, Police Station Hari Nagar. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant, who is a singer 2. CRL.M.C. 761/2019 Page 1 of 3 had sung a song, of which, the music was produced by the petitioner. There were disputes with regard to the sharing of the amount an...
A S vs.s J
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~15 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. 03.2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 334/2018 A S S J CORAM: ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Mr. Umang Kumar Singh & Mr. Pratyaksh Sharma, Advocates versus Through: None ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 54267/2018 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay. None is present to oppose the prayer made in the application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 54268/2018 3. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking to bring on record additional facts by way of an affidavit describing various incidents of cruelty inflicted upon her by the respondent. None has appeared for the respondent and there is no opposition to the prayer made in this application.4. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is a...
Karan a Chanana vs.govt. Of Nct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~4 & 7-11 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + + + + Decided on:28. h March, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3791/2016 and Crl.M.A.15849/2016 CRL.M.C. 4405/2016 and Crl.M.A.18399/2016 CRL.M.C. 4415/2016 and Crl.M.A.18431/2016 CRL.M.C. 4416/2016 and Crl.M.A.18433/2016 CRL.M.C. 4417/2016 and Crl.M.A.18435/2016 CRL.M.C. 4418/2016 and Crl.M.A.18437/2016 KARAN A CHANANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Iggu Chittiappa, Advocate with Mr. Karthik K.R., Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State Mr. Gaurav Mittal, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions arise out of six different criminal complaints (Nos. 2166/1/15, 2161/1/15, 2165/1/15, 2162/1/15, 2163/1/15 and 2164/1/15) instituted by the second respondent in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate, each alleging offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on the averments, inter alia, of there being no payment tendered...
Shri Sandeep Singh vs.shri Pratap Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
$~J- * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:28. 03.2019 + CS(OS) 580/2017 SHRI SANDEEP SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.P.S.Bindra, Adv. Versus SHRI PRATAP SINGH & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.A.K.Sen and Mr.Shyam Dutt, Advs. for D-1 and D-2 alongwith Sh.Pratap Singh in person. Mr.S.K.Rout and Mr.Aman Mehrotra, Advs. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA Nos.12407/2017 & 15204/2017 1. IA Nos.12407/2017 is filed seeking ex-parte ad-interim injunction. This court on 27.10.2017 had directed the parties to maintain status quo with regard to the possession and title of the four suit properties mentioned in para 3 of the plaint. IA No.15204/2017 is filed under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC by defendant Nos.1 and 2 for vacation of the ex-parte injunction order passed on 27.10.2017.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration , partition and permanent prohibitory injunction regarding the following agricultural properties:-"CS (OS) ...
Sh. Ravi & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1639/2019 SH. RAVI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. G.S. Sharma, Mr. R.A.Sharma and Mr. V.K.Sharma, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sandeep Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.149/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 19th March, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by with SI Sandeep Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties now stands settled and she is ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »