Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Caretel Infotech Ltd. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2178/2018 CM Nos. 8998/2018, 6586/2019 and 11277/2019 CARETEL INFOTECH LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjeev Sagar and Ms Nazia Parveen, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU for UOI. % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER1203.2019 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 22.02.2018 (hereafter the impugned order), whereby the petitioner has been debarred from participating in any tender process of the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India (the respondent), for a period of two years from the date of the said order. The aforesaid punitive measure was imposed on the petitioner on an allegation that it had submitted incorrect information with regard to the Call Centers, which were claimed to be functional at Jaipur, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad and Jabalpur.2. On 30.05.2017, the respondent floated an e-te...
Salman Ansari @ Alamgir vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
#5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. h March, 2019 CRL.A. 8/2019 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent SALMAN ANSARI @ ALAMGIR STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent versus : Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI Mahendra, P.S. Adarsh Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The present appeal has been instituted on behalf of the appellant, Salman Ansari @ Alamgir, who alongwith the prime accused Rakesh @ Vakil @ Bakku was convicted by the Trial Court for an offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC vide judgment dated 24.04.2018 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of one year.2. It was the prosecutions case that, the appellant herein with the common intention to murder the dec...
Manoj Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 931/2005 MANOJ KUMAR Decided on:12. h March, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gautam Khazanchi and Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocates with appellant in person from JC STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with SI Avinash Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant alongwith five others stood trial in Sessions case no.101/2004 in the court of the additional sessions judge on the basis of reports (charge-sheets) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) which were submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) no.53/2001 of police station Chitranjan Park and nos.202-05/01, all of police station Malviya Nagar. The FIR no.53/2001 had been registered on 07.03.2001 at the instance of Vineet Oberoi (PW-1) regarding offences punishable under Sections 392, 394, 397 of Indian Penal Crl. A. No.931/2005 Page 1 of 14 Code, 1860 (IPC). On 08.03...
Chander Prakash Verma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 617/2019 CHANDER PRAKASH VERMA ........ Petitioner STATE versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: Advocates. For the... Petitioner : Mr. Aabid Ujer with Mr. Raj Kumar, For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail in FIR No.79/2019 under Sections 380/381/4IPC, Police Station Nihal Vihar on the ground of his marriage, which is scheduled for 13.03.2019.2. Learned APP for the State, under instructions, submits that the factum of marriage has been verified and as per the communication received from Mr. Anil Kumar, Pradhan, Gram Panchayat, marriage is scheduled on 13.03.2019.3. By order dated 14.02.2019, petitioner has been directed to be released on custody parole. BAIL APPLN.617/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that sol...
S. P. Singla Constructions Private Limited and Anr. Vs.rail Vikas Niga ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2484/2019 & CM Nos. 11553-11554/2019 S. P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Anirudh Wadhwa, Mr Pradeep Chhindra, Mr Parinay Chhindra, Mr Parinay Vasandani, Mr Bhargav Thali, Advocates. versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED Through Mr Udit Seth, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1203.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:-"to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction the Respondent, to open and consider the bid submitted by the... Petitioner in response to the Notice Inviting Tender dated 31.10.2018 issued by the Respondent for construction of 24x76.20 M SPAN Important Bridge over river Ganga at Allahabad between Jhusi and Daraganj Station of NER in the State of Uttar Pradesh, India, on merits and in accordance with law; Th...
Ajay Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 12, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1331/2019 AJAY SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.R. Parashar and Mr. Anand Parashar, Advocates STATE & ANR. Versus Through: Mr. .....Respondent Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Ramesh Kumar Mr. Ajay Kumar Gaur, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.200/2012, under Sections 498- A/406/354/5of IPC, registered at police station Nihal Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 30th August, 2017 reached between the parties. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that respondent No.2 is unable to come due to unavoidable circumstances but she has instructed him to accept payment and make statement on her behalf before the Court. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that terms of aforesaid Mediated Settlement of 30th August, 2017 have been fully acted upon, as today demand draft of 1,50,000/- ...
Ritu Jain vs.the State Through Standing Counsel & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h March, 2019 CRL.M.C. 555/2016 & Crl.M.A. 2315/2016 RITU JAIN Through: Ms. Anjali J.Manish & Ms. ........ Petitioner Nidhi Saini, Advs. versus THE STATE THROUGH STANDING COUNSEL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is described as the proprietor of a firm called M/s Shrey Overseas. On the criminal complaint (CC No.1047/2015) of the second respondent, she and her said firm (shown in the array as second and first accused respectively) were summoned by the Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 19.05.2015, on the accusations of offence punishable under Section 25 read with Section 27 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. It appears that in the said criminal complaint, the second respondent (the complainant) had, inter alia, mentioned the name of one Manish Kumar Jain (shown in the array as third accused), his descrip...
Hcl Infosystems Ltd vs.ferranti Computer System India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 515/2015 HCL INFOSYSTEMS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhilesh Arora, Advocate. Versus FERRANTI COMPUTER SYSTEM INDIA PVT LTD Through: None. ..... Defendant Date of Decision:12. h March, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for recovery of Rs. 4,59,83,411/- along with pendente-lite interest @ 18% per annum and damages. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"(a) Pass a decree of Rs. 1,76,80,511/- (Rupees One Crore Seventy Six Lacs, Eighty Thousand Five Hundred and Eleven only) towards recovery of the sum which had been paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant towards the performance of the Agreements, which the Defendant has miserably failed to perform alongwith interest @18% p.a. amounting to around Rs. 50,00,000 (Rupees Fifty Lacs Only) till the date of filing of the present suit. (b) Pass a decree for a minimum of Rs. 2,33,02,900 (Rupees T...
Amit Nehra vs.union of India Ard Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7179/2017 AMIT NEHRA Through: Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA ARD ORS Through: Mr. Dev P.Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Jatin Teotia, Advocates for Respondent No.1 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER1203.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner who joined the Border Security Force (BSF) as Assistant Commandant (AC) in October, 2011 has filed this petition for quashing his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the year 2015-16 as being malafide and contrary to the applicable rules. He seeks a direction to the... RESPONDENTS i.e. the Director General of Police (DGP), BSF (Respondent No.2) to read the adverse remark good as very good in the said APAR.2. The background facts are that after the... Petitioner joined the BSF as AC, he was posted to 142nd Battalion in the M & C Frontier in November, 2012. W.P.(C) 7179/2017 Page 1 of 11 In September, 201...
Kailash Panwar & Ors vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 12, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1334/2019 and CRL.M.A. 5315/2019 KAILASH PANWAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Hitesh Kumar Bhardwaj, Versus Advocate THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: Mr. .....Respondents Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Ashok Rajbaniya Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.198/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Farsh Bazar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 11th June, 2018 (Annexure-D) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Ashok Rajbaniya on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2 present in the Court, submits that the dispute bet...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »