Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Intercity Hotel Gmbh vs.hotel Intercity Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:30. 01.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:13. 03.2019 CS(COMM) 1108/2018 INTERCITY HOTEL GMBH ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr.C.A.Brijesh, Mr.Dhruv Grover and Mr.Rohan Seth, Advs. Versus HOTEL INTERCITY DELHI & ORS Through Mr.Anil ..... Defendants Sapra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Satish Kumar, Mr.Vishal Patel, Mr.Sarthak Katyal and Ms.Akanksha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.12193/2018 1. This application is filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendants, their servants, partners etc. from using the mark HOTEL INTERCITY DELHI or any other mark identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs registered trademark INTERCITYHOTEL either as a trade mark/corporate name/domain name.2. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying suit for permanent injunction against infringement of trade mark, passing off, unfair competition, rendition of accoun...
M/S Ashwath Infratech Private Limited vs.m/s Bantair India Private Lim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h March, 2019. + CS(OS) 535/2018, I.A. 14577/2018, 2699/2019 M/S ASHWATH INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vishal Gohri, Advocate (M:97114. 5398). versus M/S BANTAIR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS...... Defendants Through: Mr. Arun Sharma and Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocates for D-1, 2 and 4 (M:99100. 0532). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 2700/2019 (18 days delay in re-filing) 1.2. The delay is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. The application is allowed. CS (OS) 535/2018, I.As. 14577/2018 & 2699/2019 3. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction and damages in respect of its registered design bearing No.258908 dated 23rd December, 2013. The same is in respect of the shape and configuration of a Rain Water Filter. The design is stated to be valid and subsisting. The total sales figures of the Plaintiff, from 2013-2018 is over 153 ...
Vinod Kumar Pandey vs.vijay Aggarwal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~28 & 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h March, 2019 + LPA11942006 VINOD KUMAR PANDEY AND ANR. Versus SHEESH RAM SAINI & ANR ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS :1. + LPA11962006 VINOD KUMAR PANDEY Versus VIJAY AGGARWAL & ANR Present:-"Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, for appellant Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Mehtaab Singh Sandhu & Mr. Pratishth Kaushal, Advs. LPA11942006. Mr. Jai Bansal with Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advs. for appellant in LPA11962006. Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aman Vachher, Mr. Ashutosh Dubey & Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Advs. for respondents. in CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice(Oral) Challenging orders passed by the writ court in W.P.(Crl.) No.675/2001 on 26.06.2006 directing registration of an FIR against the appellant Vinod Kumar Pandey, LPA No.1196/2006 has been filed under LPA11942006 & 1196/2...
Chandan @ Gaurav Jha vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 13, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1349/2019 and Crl.M.A. 5393/2019 CHANDAN @ GAURAV JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Devinder Singh Mr. R.K. Shukla, Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.876/2016, under Section 354(A) of IPC, registered at police station Aman Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 of 25th January, 2019 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been CRL.M.C. 1349/2019 Pag...
Akash Arya vs.punjab National Bank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
+ W.P.(C) 2908/2016 AKASH ARYA Reserved on:19. 02.2019 Pronounced on:12. 03.2019 ........ Petitioner $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.Shanker Raju, Adv. with Mr.Nilansh Gaur, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Rajat Arora, Adv. with Mr.Murad Khan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions as under: a) Quash and set aside impugned penalty order dated 30.05.2013 (Annexure P-1) impugned appellate order dated 29.08.2014 (Annexure P-2) and the impugned order in review dated 09.06.2015 (Annexure P-3) and also the inquiry report dated 09.10.2012 at Annexure P-4 and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits; W.P.(C) No.2908/2016 Page 1 of 16 b) Declare Regulation 4(i) of PNB Officers (D&A) Regulations, 1977 (Annexure P-5) as ultra vires on being discriminatory to the extent of denial of superannuation benefit...
Deepak vs.m/s Bb Metals
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 03.2019 CRL.REV.P. 788/2015 DEEPAK M/S BB METALS versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Sunil Kr. Bhatt, Adv. J.K. Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT CRL.REV.P. 788/2015 & Crl. M.A. 441/2016 (Release of the amount) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 26.11.2015 whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning judgment on conviction dated 24.08.2015 and order on sentence dated 04.09.2015 was dismissed.2. The petitioner was convicted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo rigours imprisonment for a period of three months. The petitioner was also directed to pay compensation of Rs. 3,25,000/-. CRL.REV.P7882015 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has deposited the entire comp...
Fahimuddin & Ors vs.chaman & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 12, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5211/2017 & CRL.M.A. 20495/2017 FAHIMUDDIN & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vishal Diwedi and Mr. Milan, Advocates Versus CHAMAN & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Santosh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1031/2014, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station New Usmanpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 7th November, 2017 of respondent No.2 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Santosh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2 present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably res...
Union of India vs.dr. m.r. Diwan & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5653/2018 & CM Nos. 22051-22052/2018 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC. versus DR. M.R. DIWAN & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J.(Oral) This writ petition has been filed by the Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India (hereinafter the Ministry) impugning order dated 05.04.2018 made by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter the Tribunal) in OA No.1645/2017, whereby the Tribunal has allowed OA No.1645/2017 filed by respondent No.1/Dr. M.R. Diwan (hereinafter the Officer) and has quashed penalty order dated 19.06.2017 imposed by the Ministry upon the Officer. By penalty order dated 19.06.2017 the Ministry has imposed a penalty of WP(C) No.5653/2018 page 1 of 12 withholding 50 per cent pension and gratuity upon the Officer. The Tribunal has ...
Gail Gas Limited vs.m/s Balkishan Agarwal Glass Industries Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 291/2018 GAIL GAS LIMITED Date of Judgment:12. h March, 2019 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anurag Kishore, Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Ms. Saumya Gupta and Mr. S.P. Krishna Prasad, Advocates M/S BALKISHAN AGARWAL GLASS INDUSTRIES LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Samrat K. Nigam, Mr. Shaurya Kuthiala, Ms. Manisha Mehta, Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Mr. R.L. Sinha, Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh and Mr. Zubin Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CMs. APPL514902018(delay) & 51491/2018(delay in re-filing) 1. By these applications, the applicant/appellant seeks condonation of 21 days delay in filing and 95 days delay in re-filing the present appeal.2. For the reasons stated in applications, delay in filing and re-filing the appeal is condoned.3. The applications stand disposed of. FAO(...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.dr. Badri Singh Bhandari & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:12. 03.2019 W.P.(C) No.8193/2015 ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, Adv. with Mr.Savan Kumar, Adv. & Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Under Secretary. Versus DR. BADRI SINGH BHANDARI & ANR Through Mr.Prateek Tushar Mohanty, Adv. for ........ RESPONDENTS R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner/Union of India assails the order dated 23rd October, 2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.761/2012. The Tribunal allowed the said Original Application preferred by the two respondents and directed that the respondents be placed in Pay Band- 4 w.e.f. 1st January, 2006, by granting them the benefit of non- functional upgradation w.e.f. 1st January, 2006 in place of 3rd January, 2006.2. The present writ petition was preferred sometime in July, 2015. We may take note of some material de...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »