Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors. Vs.shakuntala Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) No.2072/2019 & C.M. Nos.9685-86/2019 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Mr.N.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners Versus SHAKUNTALA DEVI Through Nemo. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution assails the order dated 26.09.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) in OA No.2537 of 2016, whereunder the Tribunal has partly allowed the original application filed by the respondent/applicant and directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 68,325/- towards the cost of the three air tickets for the journey undertaken by the respondent along with her two family members from Delhi to Port Blair while she was in service.2. The respondent who was working as a Deputy Nursing Superintendent (Group B) had, ...
Lalit Kumar Arya & Anr. Vs.m/s Prabhat Zarda Factory International (No ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~2, 3 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h March, 2019 + 3 + 9 + LALIT KUMAR ARYA & ANR. CS(COMM) 1031/2016 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate for P-2 & Applicant (M-9910995511) M/S PRABHAT ZARDA FACTORY INTERNATIONAL (NOIDA) versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Trivedi, Mr. Sachin Jain, Ms. Diya Kapoor, Advocates (M-99682283100 LALIT KUMAR ARYA & ANR. WITH CS(COMM) 1032/2016 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate for P-2 I.A.546/2019 in and Applicant (M-9910995511) versus PRABHAT ZARDA FACTORY CO. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Trivedi, Mr. Sachin Jain, Ms. Diya Kapoor, Advocates JYOTI KUMAR ARYA & ORS. CS(OS) 1319/2013 & I.A. 526/2019 AND ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Trivedi, Mr. Sachin Jain, Ms. Diya Kapoor, Advocates LALIT KUMAR ARYA & ORS. versus Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate ..... Defendants for CORA...
Steel Authority of India Limited vs.g K Lata & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4574/2017 & Crl.M.A. 18223/2017 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S.Phoolka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alakh Kumar, Advocate Versus G K LATA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Sharma & Ms. Rupali Sharma, Advocates CRL.M.C. 4575/2017 & Crl.M.A. 18227/2017 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S.Phoolka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alakh Kumar, Advocate Versus S M LATA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Sharma & Ms. Rupali + CRL.M.C. 5168/2017 & Crl.M.A. 20354/2017 Sharma, Advocates STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S.Phoolka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alakh Kumar, Advocate Versus Crl.M.C. 4574/2017 Crl.M.C. 4575/2017 Crl.M.C. 5168/2017 Crl.M.C. 5171/2017 Page 1 of 6 + S M LATA & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Sharma & Ms. Rupali Sharma, Advocates CRL.M.C. 5171/2017 & Crl.M.A. 20365...
Mohan Kabira vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10093/2018 & CM No.39344/2018 Date of decision:13. h March, 2019 MOHAN KABIRA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Shikha Sharma Bagga, Adv. for Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. For R-1&2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 10.08.2018 made by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.2975/2018 whereby the Tribunal has rejected the petitioners application challenging order dated 21.05.2018 made by respondent No.2/Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi (the Directorate). By way of order dated 21.05.2018 the Directorate had rejected the petitioners candidature for empanelment as Guest Teacher, TGT-Hindi in Delhi Government Schools.2. The genesis of the matter is a public ...
Manoj Kumar Gupta vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~25 to 30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1633/2017 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law CRPF with Mr.Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF. + W.P.(C) 1639/2017 + SURESH KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law CRPF with Mr.Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF. W.P.(C) 1649/2017 RAMESH KUMAR PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman W.P.(C) 1633/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 9 + + Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh,...
Daulat Ram Kapoor vs.ushma Sharda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:13. h March, 2019 + RC.REV. 473/2017 & CM APPL No.37734/2017 DAULAT RAM KAPOOR Through : Mr.C.S.Bhandari, Advocate. ........ Petitioner USHMA SHARDA versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr Advocate with Mr.Ganesh Sharma, Ms.Manisha Mehta, Ms.Mrigna Shekhar and Mr.Zubin Singh, Advocates. Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition assails the order dated 11.05.2017 passed by the learned ARC East, Karkardooma Court, Delhi, in eviction case no.702/2016.2. Vide the impugned order the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order was passed by the Court.3. The respondent filed an eviction petition in respect of the shop admeasuring 7x9 approx. without roof rights in premises no.E-4/24, Krishna Nagar, Delhi-110051 on the plea this property along with an adjoining shop is required by the respondent and her h...
Alm Food Products Limited vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6831/2017 and CM APPL. 27124/2018 ALM FOOD PRODUCTS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Senior Advocate with Mr Umang Gupta, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr JatinTeotia, Advocate alongwith Mr Girinder Joshi, Under Secretary, MOFPI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1303.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the Revised Operational Guidelines of the Scheme for Integrated Cold Chain and Value Addition Infrastructure (effective from 29.08.2016) (hereafter the Scheme).2. The petitioner further prays that a direction be issued to the respondent to grant subsidy for an amount of 10 crores, as per the aforementioned scheme.3. The petitioners application for the grant of subsidy under the Scheme was rejected, inter alia,on the ground that the petitioners proposal did not includ...
Kapil vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 269/2019 KAPIL STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K. Singhal with Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. Inspector Madhav Krishna, PS Nangloi. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.441/2016 under Sections 498/304B IPC, Police Station Nangloi.2.... Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The deceased expired after 1 year 4 months of the marriage. The FIR is registered on the complaint of the father of the deceased.3. It is alleged in the FIR that after 6 months of the marriage, petitioner used to harass the deceased and used to demand money from her. It is further alleged that the deceased had informed her BAIL APPLN.269/2019 Page 1 of 3 parents that the petitioner used t...
Rahul Sharma vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1365/2019 & CRL.M.A. 5429/2019 RAHUL SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Adarsh Tripathi and Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional .....Respondents Standing Counsel and Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners complaint under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. stands dismissed by trial court vide order of 2nd July, 2018 by observing that petitioner/complainant has to make out a case and the present complaint is nothing but a sheer abuse of the process of the Court, which cannot be allowed. Revisional Court vide impugned order of 27th October, 2018 has affirmed trial courts order while observing that complainant cannot be given permission to file second complaint on the same facts. Learned senior counsel for petitioner submits that the...
Runway Logistics Private Ltd. Vs.paras Imports Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~18. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 37/2019, IA No.1077/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.1078/2019 (u/O XL R-1 for appointment of a Receiver). RUNWAY LOGISTICS PRIVATE LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Mansi Kukreja and Ms. Vidhi Goel, Advs. 0versus PARAS IMPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Randhir Jain, Mr. Dhananjai Jain and Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER1303.2019 IA No.3631/2019 (of the defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC).1. The counsel for the defendants/applicants, instead of arguing the application, has at the outset contended that I should recuse from hearing this suit as well as all other matters in which Mr. Randhir Jain, Advocate appears, owing to common order dated 20th February, 2018 in CS(OS) No.385/2010 and Test. Cas. No.26/2010 and a copy of which is handed over. Attention is particularly invited to paras 4 and 16 of the said order.2. 3. The aforesaid order...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »