Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sachchidanand Suman vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~25 to 30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1633/2017 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law CRPF with Mr.Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF. + W.P.(C) 1639/2017 + SURESH KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law CRPF with Mr.Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF. W.P.(C) 1649/2017 RAMESH KUMAR PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman W.P.(C) 1633/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 9 + + Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh,...
Shalini & Anr vs.kuldeep Singh & Ors (Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h March, 2019 $~ * % + MAC.APP. 458/2018 1. SHALINI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Ms.Sarika Goel, Advocate versus KULDEEP SINGH & ORS (HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Pankaj Singh, Thakur, Advocate for Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for HDFC. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.9,78,000/- has been awarded to the claimants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.2. On 22nd May, 2015 at about 11.30-12.00 A.M., Deepak along with Pawan, Sunny, Ravish and respondent no.1 were travelling in a Duster car bearing No.DL-13C-6613 being driven by respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 was driving the car rashly and negligently because of which he lost control over the car and hit the car against a road divider near Dharmshila Hospital Road after which the car hit an ambulance and thereafter, the car fell in the Ghazipur Ca...
Jyoti Kumar Arya & Ors. Vs.lalit Kumar Arya & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~2, 3 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h March, 2019 + 3 + 9 + LALIT KUMAR ARYA & ANR. CS(COMM) 1031/2016 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate for P-2 & Applicant (M-9910995511) M/S PRABHAT ZARDA FACTORY INTERNATIONAL (NOIDA) versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Trivedi, Mr. Sachin Jain, Ms. Diya Kapoor, Advocates (M-99682283100 LALIT KUMAR ARYA & ANR. WITH CS(COMM) 1032/2016 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate for P-2 I.A.546/2019 in and Applicant (M-9910995511) versus PRABHAT ZARDA FACTORY CO. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Trivedi, Mr. Sachin Jain, Ms. Diya Kapoor, Advocates JYOTI KUMAR ARYA & ORS. CS(OS) 1319/2013 & I.A. 526/2019 AND ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Trivedi, Mr. Sachin Jain, Ms. Diya Kapoor, Advocates LALIT KUMAR ARYA & ORS. versus Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate ..... Defendants for CORA...
Mohd Javed & Ors vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)& Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 13, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1374/2019 and CRL.M.As. 5456-5457/2019 MOHD JAVED & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mashhood Ul Haq and Mr. Irfan, Advocates Versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR.....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Anita Mr. Safuddin, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.130/2016, under Sections 354/354B/3and 509 of IPC, registered at police station Chandni Mahal, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 26th February, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been CRL.M.C. 1374/2017 P...
The Delhi Transport Corporation and Ors. Vs.jagdish Chander
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~28. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2461/2019 Date of Decision:13. 03.2019 THE DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS. Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Standing Counsel, DTC. ........ Petitioner Through: versus JAGDISH CHANDER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.11447/2019 & C.M. No.11448/2019 ..... Respondent Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2461/2019 & C.M. No.11446/2019 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 28.09.2018, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.3645/2011. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has disposed of the Original Application by reducing the penalty imposed upon the respondent from removal from service to that of Compulsory Retirement. While upholding the finding that the respondent/ original applicant was guilty of misconduct and, therefore, was liable t...
Bipn vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 22/2019 BIPN STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Ahuja, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Manoj Kumar, PS Sarita Vihar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.399/2018 under Sections 353/332/186/5of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner along with co- accused had gone to the veterinary hospital for check-up of their dog. However, doctors were busy in some official duty. It is alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused misbehaved with the doctors and thereafter assaulted them with sticks and lathis and also ransacked the hospital.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the p...
Ashok Kumar Tohani & Anr. Vs.m/s Capital First Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h March, 2019 + O.M.P. 1124/2013 ASHOK KUMAR TOHANI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeev Saxena and Mr. Manish Advocates. Khurana, (M:9466593775) versus M/S CAPITAL FIRST LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate. (M:9811087995) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, Act) has been preferred against the impugned order dated 25th June, 2013 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator. The... Petitioners were borrowers of a loan of Rs.89,50,000/- from M/s. CitiFinancial Consumer Finance India Limited. The loan was secured by offering immovable property bearing No.B-94, Sector-14, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, as security. The loan was then disbursed to the... Petitioners- borrowers. There was a default in payment of various EMIs and despite repeated reminders, the payments were not...
Kaustav Barua vs.university of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h March, 2019 KAUSTAV BARUA + W.P.(C) 8991/2018 & CM APPL. 34648/2018 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Seema Sharma, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for R-1/University of Delhi Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. with Mr. Aakash Yadav, Adv. for R-2/College % 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner, who claims to be a National level black belt Taekwondo champion, joined the 2016-2017 academic session, in the course in the Respondent No.2-College (hereinafter referred to as the College).2. The petitioner attended classes regularly during his first two semesters and also appeared in all the ten papers in the said two semesters, which he cleared. The petitioner also appeared in the third semester examination 3. in the second year of the course being undertaken by him, which, too, he cleared, though Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, learn...
Suresh Kumar Sharma vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~25 to 30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1633/2017 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law CRPF with Mr.Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF. + W.P.(C) 1639/2017 + SURESH KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law CRPF with Mr.Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF. W.P.(C) 1649/2017 RAMESH KUMAR PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman W.P.(C) 1633/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 9 + + Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh,...
Ardor Restaurant and Ors. Vs.bal Mukund, Food Safety Officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10418/2018 & CM No.40604/2018 ARDOR RESTAURANT AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Sanjeev Narang with Mr R. K. Ahuja and Mr Kapil Sharma, Advocates. versus BAL MUKUND, FOOD SAFETY OFFICER ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Ms Nikita Goyal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1303.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Although, the present petition has been styled as writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it ought to be treated as an appeal under Section 71(6) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (hereafter the FSS Act).2. The petitioners herein have impugned an order dated 19.07.2018 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal (hereafter the Tribunal). By the impugned order, the penalty imposed on the petitioners for non-disclosure of nutritional facts on the label of the food article, Chilli Sauce, in terms of the Food S...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »