Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Everstone Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Vs.everstone Ventures Llp
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h March, 2019 CS(COMM) No.880/2018 & IA Nos. 68(u/O XXXIX R12), 37(of plaintiff u/o VIII R10 EVERSTONE CAPITAL ADVISORS PVT. LTD. .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Shikha Sachdeva & Ms. Mugdha Palsule, Advs.. Versus EVERSTONE VENTURES LLP ...Defendant Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Mr. Rajat Mittal, Mr. Toyesh Tewari & Ms. Shruti Arora, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit to restrain the defendant from infringing the trade mark EVERSTONE of the plaintiff and thereby passing off its goods and services as those of the plaintiff, and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 16th May, 2018 when though the suit was entertained and summons thereof ordered to be issued but on the counsel for the plaintiff not pressing for interim orders at that stage with liberty to pray for the same...
Leo Ispat Limited vs.radlay Metal Products Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2019
$~16 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 20/2019 LEO ISPAT LIMITED ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Himanshu Garg & Mr. Shakeel Sarwarwani, Advs. Versus RADLAY METAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD...... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Kunal Sachdeva & Ms. Srishti Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % Execution of a money decree is sought by attachment of the ORDER1403.2019 immovable and movable properties of the judgment-debtor at (i) K-44, Udyog Nagar, near Peeragarhi, New Delhi, (ii) Factory at 278, Swarn Park, Udyog Nagar, Mundka, New Delhi, and (iii) 106, First Floor, State Bank Nagar, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi-63.2. The counsel for the decree-holder, on enquiry states that the decree- holder has satisfied itself that only the judgment-debtor is in existence at the first two of the aforesaid three premises and none else is in existence. With respect to the third of the aforesaid properties, it is stated that it is the residence of the Director of the judgmen...
Anita Jain & Ors. Vs.the High Court of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~09. * + % W.P.(C) 8573/2016 & CM APPL. 35301/2016 ANITA JAIN & ORS Date of Decision:14. 03.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K. Behera, Mr.Harpreet Singh and Mr.A.P. Singh, Advocates versus THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao and Mr.Anandh Venkataramani, Adv, for respondent no.1 Ms.Palak Rohmetra and Ms.Sakshi Shairwal, for Ms.Avnish Ahalawat, Standing counsel for GNCTD (Services) respondents No.2 Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil), GNCTD and Ms.Sukriti Ghai, Advocate for respondent no.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. At the outset, it is pointed out by counsel for the petitioner that prayer (i) made in the present writ petition is incorrectly typed, inasmuch, as, the petitioners seek quashing and setting aside the impugned letter dated W.P.(C.) No.8573/2016 Page 1 of 8 6.3.2009 by which the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court conveyed ...
The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Anr vs.m/s Rana Chairs & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2019
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:14. 03.2019 RFA(OS) 8/2019 THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR Through: Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sujoy Mondal & Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, Advocates ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Advocate for R-1 with R-1 in person versus M/S RANA CHAIRS & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 17.09.2015 passed 1. by a Single Judge of this Court. The respondent had filed a suit for recovery against the appellant herein in the sum of Rs. 50,83,155/- together with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 18% per annum together with costs 2. The subject matter of the suit was supply and fixing of 750 auditorium chairs in Sarat Sadan Behla, Calcutta. Parties entered into an agreement on 10.02.2010. As the appellant/ respondent (defendant before the Single Judge) failed to...
Atibal Singh vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2019
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 658/2019 Judgment delivered on:14. 03.2019 ATIBAL SINGH versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. S.K. Rai, Advocate. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.5592/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 658/2019 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.310/2018 under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Sarita Vihar.2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to information received that a person was found in an injured condition under a flyover. When the concerned duty officer reached the flyover, he came to know that the person had been moved to Apollo Hospital. During investigation, Bail Appln.658/2019 Page 1 of 6 it was found that the person had succumbed to his injuries because of a ...
Ramanpreet Singh vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 14, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1389/2019 and CRL.M.A. 5543/2019 RAMANPREET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dwivedi & Mr. Prakash, Advocates. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI B. Nand. Mr. R.S. Dakha & Mr. Sunny Jain, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1318/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 of 13th February, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI B. Nand on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1389/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, prese...
Chandraveer Giri & Ors vs.state ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2019
$~3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1854/2016 Decided on:-"14th March, 2019 CHANDRAVEER GIRI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohan Kanhai, Advocate Versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Govind Singh, PS Uttam Nagar. Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 07.02.2011. From out of cohabitation of the said parties a male child Vaibhav took birth on 01.01.2012. On 19.10.2011, on the complaint of the second respondent, first information report (FIR) No.511/2011 was registered by Police Station Uttam Nagar involving offences punishable under sections 406/498-A/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the allegations having been made against the first petitioner (the husband), his father (the second petitioner), his mother (the third petitioner) his broth...
Arvind Kumar Singh vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~25 to 30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1633/2017 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law CRPF with Mr.Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF. + W.P.(C) 1639/2017 + SURESH KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law CRPF with Mr.Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF. W.P.(C) 1649/2017 RAMESH KUMAR PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Mr.Bhanu Gupta and Mr.Anshuman W.P.(C) 1633/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 9 + + Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh,...
Colonel Anand Sagar Sahgal (Retd.) and Anr. Vs.director General Resett ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12682/2018 COLONEL ANAND SAGAR SAHGAL (RETD.) AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr S. Venkatesh, Ms Nishtha Kumar, Mr Samarth Kashyap, Mr Somesh Srivastava and Mr Vikas Maini, Advocates. versus DIRECTOR GENERAL RESETTLEMENT, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with Col. Prashant, DGR. Mr Advocate for R-2. Sandeep Mahapatra, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1303.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition impugning an order dated 15.11.2018 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no.1 (Directorate General Resettlement DGR) dis- empanelling petitioner no.1 from the DGR Scheme for violating the Guidelines for functioning of DGR Empanelled Ex-Servicemen for security services (hereafter the DGR Guidelines). W.P.(C) 12682/2018 Page 1 of 9 2.... Petitioner no.1 is a former member of the Indian Army (Ex-...
India Tourism Development Corporation vs.cp Associates Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 39/2019 & IAs 1169-71/2019 & 2369/2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 40/2019 & IAs 1172-74/2019 & 2641/2019 Reserved on:20. 02.2019 Date of Decision :13. 03.2019 INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sangram Patnaik, Mr.Rajiv Gupta and Mr.Madhav Chaturvedi, Advs. versus CP ASSOCIATES PVT LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanyat Lodha, Ms.Sanjana Saddy and Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Advs. for R-1 and 2. Mr.Jaikush Hoon and Mr.Vaibhav Vats, Advs. for R-3/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA IA26392019 (delay) in OMP(Comm.) 39/2019 IA26412019 (delay) in OMP(Comm.) 40/2019 1. These applications have been filed seeking condonation of 46 days delay in re-filing of the petitions.2. It is stated by the counsel for the petitioner that after passing of the Impugned Award, the petitioner had filed an application under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) be...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »