Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hargyan Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. hMarch, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2754/2012 HARGYAN SINGH ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav, versus Advocate. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate With Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 and 227 of The Constitution of India seeking writ in the nature of mandamus or certiorari directing the... RESPONDENTS herein to act in the matter immediately and recommend an alternative plot of 250 Sq. Yds. as per the scheme to the petitioner in respect of his acquired land and further to send the file bearing No.F.33(29)/13/87/L&B/Alt to DDA for allotment. W.P.(C) 2754/2012 Page 1 of 7 2. Brief facts stated are that on 27.03.1985 land bearing Khasra No.54/14(4-16), 15(1-14), 66/24(4-16), 71/4(4-16) measuring 16 Bighas 2 Biswa situated in village Samaypur, Delhi was got...
In the Matter of indiahit.com Private Limited (In Vol. Liqn.) Vs...... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~CP-31 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 03.2019 CO.PET. 8/2019 IN THE MATTER OF INDIAHIT.COM PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL. LIQN.) Petitioner Through Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate on behalf of OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a company petition, preferred under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act). The prayer made in the petition is that the subject company i.e., INDIAHIT.COM PRIVATE LIMITED (herein referred to as the said company), be dissolved from the date of the filing of the instant petition.2. The record shows that the said Company was incorporated on 20.06.2000, with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana (ROC). The Corporate Identity Number of the said Company is U72900DL2000PTC106364. The authorised share capital of the said company is Rs. 1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Only), divided into 10,00,000 (Ten Lakh only) equity shares of Rs. 10/- (Rupees Ten) eac...
Supreme Agrofoods Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~65 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3038/2019 & CM No.14024/2019 SUPREME AGROFOODS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Anmol Chadha and Ms. Rudratti Kaur, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. (appearance not given), Advocate. JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition to seek the direction to the respondent to accept the request for renewal and/or restoration of the registered trademark No.1235463 in class 30 in the name of the petitioner and renew the trademark registration for further period of 10 years.2. Learned counsel the respondent submits that he has received written instructions from the Trademark Registry that the petitioners application No.1235463 shall be considered in accordance with the law upon submission of renewal request with restoration fee.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the respondents response and submits that t...
Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr vs.amarjeet Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 7415/2016 & C.M. No.30463/2016 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:29. 03.2019 Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel with Mr. N.K. Singh and Ms. Ankita Ahuja, Advs. AMARJEET SINGH versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K. Singhal with Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Government of NCT of Delhi has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 27.01.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.4077/2015 (OA) preferred by the respondent/applicant.2. The respondent, in his OA, had assailed the show-cause notice dated 30.09.2015 issued to him by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, West District, New Delhi asking him to show cause as to why his services should not be terminated under rule 5(1) of Central Civil Service (Temporary Servi...
Prem Chand Kumar and Ors. Vs.railway Protection Force & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h March, 2019 Decided on:29. h March, 2019 PREM CHAND KUMAR AND ORS. WP (C) No.1350/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Mr. Parinav and Ms. Mansi Gupta, Gupta Advocates. RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Advocate for CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA RPFC. Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 55... Petitioners who applied pursuant to an Employment Notice issued by the Railway Board for the post of Constable (Water Carrier) etc. in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) including the Railway Protection Special Force (RPSF) in seven different categories including Water Carrier, Safaiwala, Washerman, Barber, Mali, Tailor and Cobbler have filed the present petition for directions to the... RESPONDENTS to appoint them to the vacancies in the above posts.2. The background facts are that Employment Notice No.1/2013 dated 6th December, 2013 was issued by the...
Shri Sohan Pal Goel vs.shri Shaleen Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. hMarch, 2019 + RFA. 372/2017 ...Appellant SHRI SOHAN PAL GOEL Through: Mr. Anunaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Akshay Deep Singhal and Mr. Siddhant Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus SHRI SHALEEN GOEL... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Dharm Vir Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The Appellant (Father of Respondent/Defendant) preferred present appeal for setting aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 15.12.2016 passed by ADJ-02 (North-East District), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in suit No.4765titled "Sohan Pal Goel v. Shaleen Goel".2. Brief facts stated are that Appellant/Plaintiff herein is father of Respondent/Defendant herein. Appellant/Plaintiff filed a suit for possession against Respondent/Defendant in respect of property i.e. Shop No.1 admeasuring 8ft x 10ft on ground floor and one room RFA. 372/2017 Page 1 of 11 admeasuring 8ft x 12ft on first floor in property bearing No.F-13,...
Ved Ram vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~61 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3140/2019 VED RAM ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Meghna De, Ms. Sugandha Kochhar, Ms. Nilam Tiwari and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jagdeep Kumar Sharma, ASC with Mr. Deepankar Sondhi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGEMENT (ORAL) CM No.14370/2019 & 14371/2019 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3140/2019 1. The petitioner was engaged by NDMC as a Mali on 01st January, 1987 and his services were regularised by the Council on 01st April, 1997. The petitioner was involved in a criminal case. However, he concealed the involvement in the criminal case in the attestation form and gave false information that no criminal case was pending against him. The pendency of the criminal case came to the notice of the Council whereupon the memos dated 23rd April, 1999 and 19th July, 1997 were issued to the petition...
Neera Chopra and Anr. Vs.deepa Bhardwaj & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 471/2018 & 17366/2018, 17660/2018, 1532/2019 I.A.Nos.12963/2018, 16888-16890/2018, NEERA CHOPRA AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Salman Khurshid, Senior Advocate with Mr.Muhammad Ali Khan, Mr.Gaurav Gupta, Mr.Omar Hoda, Mr.Jaspal Singh, Ms.Namrah Nasir, Ms.Azza Rehman and Mr.Sparsh Prasad, Advocates. versus DEEPA BHARDWAJ & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr.Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Sethi, Ms.Priya Pathania and Mr.Parinay, Advocates for defendants No.1& 2. Mr. Subhash Oberoi, Advocate for defendants No.3 and 4. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Reserved on :12. hMarch, 2019 Date of Decision:29. h March, 2019 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J.I.A. 16888/2018 1. The present suit has been filed for cancellation of registered sale deed dated 11th December, 2017 with regard to Second Floor, including terraces above the said floor of immovable property situated at C-122, Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024 (hereinafter referred...
State vs.swatantara Bharat and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:18. h February, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:29th March 2019 CRL. A. 53/2002 STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI Vipin Kumar, PS Kotwali Versus $~3 * % + SWATANTARA BHARAT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M. Shamikh, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. Present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14.07.2000 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.503/1988 arising out of FIR No.43/1988 under Sections 376/307/451 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) registered at Police Station Kotwali, whereby the respondents were acquitted for the aforesaid offence punishable under Sections 376/307/451 read with Section 34 of the IPC.... RESPONDENTS No.3 and 4 i.e. Haria and Somnath CRL.A. 53/2002 Page 1 of 40...
Time Inc. Vs.mr. Anand Nadar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 16/2019 & I.A.No.443/2019 TIME INC. ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Nancy Roy, Advocate. Versus MR. ANAND NADAR & ANR. Through None ..... Defendants Date of Decision:29. h March, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent and mandatory injunction for infringement registered trademark, passing off, unfair competition, delivery up and damages. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"A. The defendants, their directors, affiliates, employees, agents, distributors, franchisees, licensees, representatives and assigns be restrained by a permanent injunction from: (i) Using the impugned mark/name FORTUNE ASIA/ the name and FORTUNE impugned the www.fortuneasiaevent. Com and/or plaintiffs trade mark FORTUNE as a trade mark or part of a trade mark, a trade name or corporate name or as part of a trade or corporate name, as a domain name or part of a iterations of doma...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »