Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Daljit Singh vs.director of Gurdwara Elections and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decision delivered on:15. 03.2019 % + W.P.(C) 2573/2019 & CM APPL No.11982/2019 S. DALJIT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr Advocate Malhotra, and Kaushik, Mr.Vineet Gohri with Mr.Vishal Mr.Shubhendu Advocates. versus DIRECTOR OF GURDWARA ELECTIONS AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC and Mr.G.C. Shyamsunder, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr Advocate with Mr.Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition challenges the notice dated 01.03.2019 issued on behalf of the respondent No.1 to call a meeting of elected members of the Committee to hold elections for appointment of President and other office members of Executive Board until expiry of the tenure of the President and other executive members and further two years thereafter. Secondly it is alleged the respondent No.1 has no power of any kind whatsoever ...
Rain Cii Carbon (Vizag) Ltd. And Anr. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1784/2019 & CM Nos. 8349/2019 & 8350/2019 RAIN CII CARBON (VIZAG) LTD. AND ANR......... Petitioners Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr. Advocate, Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr Jafar Alam Shivani Khandekar, Advocates. and Ms versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Praveen Kumar Jain with Ms Rashmi Kumari, Advocates and Mr Nirmal Kumar, DDG. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1503.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the decision of the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), as recorded in the minutes dated 08.02.2019 (hereafter the impugned minutes), insofar as it relates to apportionment of unutilised quota of Raw Pet Coke (hereafter RPC) amongst various applicants including the petitioner.2.... Petitioner no.1 (hereafter the petitioner) is, inter alia, engaged in the manufacture of Clacined Pet Coke (hereafter CPC). The petitioner requires RPC...
Bhim Sen & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 15, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1414/2019 & CRL.M.A. 5643/2019 BHIM SEN & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Irshad Ahmad and Ms. Archana Verma, Advocates Versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Shyam Sunder Mr. Anant Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.732/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Palam Village, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 16th July, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Shyam Sunder on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1414/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Cou...
Directorate of Enforcement vs.abdullah Ali Balsharaf & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA1792019 & CM APPL. No.12127-12129/2019 Date of decision:15. h March, 2019 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.P. Singh, SPP with Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Manu Mishra & Mr. Randeep Sachdeva, Advs. versus ABDULLAH ALI BALSHARAF & Ors. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Biswajit Bhattacharya, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv. for R1 & R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.(ORAL) By way of the present appeal filed under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of this court, the appellant/Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) impugns order dated 09.01.2019 made by the single Judge in W.P. (C) No.3531/2018 (the impugned order). LPA1792019 page 1 of 20 2.... RESPONDENTS Nos. 1 and 2 in the present appeal are individuals who are ordinarily resident in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and had purchased shares of one M/s Khushi Ram Behari Lal Ltd. (KRBL) on resp...
Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools vs.directorate of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t January, 2019 Pronounced on:15. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4374/2018 & CM No.16982/2018 ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kamal Gupta and Ms. Pragya Agrawal, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC ..... RESPONDENTS for GNCTD with Mr. Chirayu Jain and Ms. N. Goyal, Advs. Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Ms. Shikha Sharma Bagga, Advs. for Justice for All Reserved on:6. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:15. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 13546/2018 & CM APPL. 52763/2018 (for stay) MOUNT CARMEL SCHOOL SOCIETY AND ANR ....... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Vedanta Varma, Mr. Chandan Kumar Mandal, Mr. Akhil Kumar Gola and Ms. Mannat Sandhu, Advs. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC with Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC for W.P.(C) 4374/2018 & W.P...
Shri Ramesh Chand vs.shri Prahlad Dass Mittal and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2644/2019 & CM No.12244-12245/2019 SHRI RAMESH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr K. K. Srivastava, Advocate. versus SHRI PRAHLAD DASS MITTAL AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1503.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 20.9.2018 passed by the Competent Authority (DUSIB) under Section 19 of the Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 (hereafter the Act). The petitioner has assailed the impugned order on the ground that the application filed by respondent no.1 before the Competent Authority was not maintainable, inasmuch as he had preferred a consolidated application in respect of three separate premises and three separate tenancies. The petitioner contends that a consolidated application under Section 19 of the Act is not maintainable.2. The Competent Authority had considered the aforesaid contention and noted that a...
Paramjeet & Ors vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 15, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1430/2019 & CRL.M.A. 5704/2019 PARAMJEET & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Juhi Arora, Advocate Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public for State with SI Prosecutor Ravinder Ms. Geeta Bhandari, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.340/2018, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Women Cell Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 16th August, 2018 (Annexure P-4) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Ravinder on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1430/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in...
Ajeet Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :31. t January, 2019 Judgment delivered on:15. h March, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 649/2017 & Crl.M.A.14196/2017 (stay) AJEET KUMAR ......... Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent : ..... Respondent Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh , Advocate. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI R.N. Ashangsomatai, PS Patel Nagar. Mr. N.L. Sahai, Advocate for complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 15.03.2017 whereby the charge has been framed against the petitioner under Section 498-A/304-B/34 of the IPC.2.... Petitioner was the husband of the deceased and was married to the deceased on 25.06.2012. A child was born from the wedlock on 10.07.2013. On 26.06.2016, the wife is alleged to have committed suicide.3. On the complaint of the father of the deceased, the subject FIR No.606/2016 wa...
Dinesh @ Bala vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 669/2019 DINESH @ BALA versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Hari Prakash with Mr. Surender Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Rekha, PS S.B. Dairy. : JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.5675/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 669/2019 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.151/2018 under Sections 323/376D/328/506 IPC and Section 4 POCSO.2. Allegation by the prosecutrix, who was aged 15 years on the date of the alleged offence, is that she was walking on the street when BAIL APPLN.669/2019 Page 1 of 3 the co-accused called her that her brother-in-law was beating her sister and asked her to make a call from the room of the petitioner. It is alleged that when she reached...
Surinder Mohan Talwar & Ors. Vs.cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h March, 2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 467/2016 SURINDER MOHAN TALWAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pinku Singh, Advocate with person.... Petitioner (M:9625949957 & 9818349856) No.1 in versus CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT & FINANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate. (M:9811182985) with Mr. Gaurav Dahiya, AR in person. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, Act) has been filed challenging award dated 21st November, 2011.2. The background of the disputes is that the... Petitioners (hereinafter Borrowers) had availed of a business loan from the Respondent - Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter, Respondent) vide loan agreement no.X0HEDHE00000383124 dated 28th November, 2008. The home equity loan, as per the loan agreement, was sanctioned for a sum of Rs.75,...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »