Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pooja Singh & Anr. Vs.r.k.kulshrestha & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h December, 2018 Decided on:18. h March, 2019 + W.P. (C) No.1997 of 2018 with CM Nos. 8210-8211 of 2018 POOJA SINGH & ANR. Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitin Saluja and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing counsel for BSES/RPL with Mr. Aman Vidyarthi, Ms.Anju Thomas & Ms.Priyansha Indra, Advocates. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for UOI. Ms.Urvi Mohan Advocate for Mr.Sanjay Ghose, ASC GNCTD. + POOJA SINGH & ANR. ..Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitin Saluja and Mr. Sangam CONT. CAS(C) No.455/2018 Kumar, Advocates. versus R.K.KULSHRESTHA & ANR. ..Respondents W.P. (C) No.1997/2018 & CONT. CAS(C) No.455/2018 Page 1 of 9 Through: Mr. Sunil Femandes, Standing counsel for BSES/RPL with Mr. Aman Vidyarthi, Ms.Anju Thomas & Ms.Priyansha Indra, Advocates. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for UOI. Ms.Urvi Mohan, Advocate...
M/S Ruchi Enterprises and Ors. Vs.m/s Fullerton India Credit Company L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"18.03.2019 + W.P.(C) 2744/2019 M/S RUCHI ENTERPRISES AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.J.Rajesh & Mr.Rohit Puri, Advs. versus M/S FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr.Sanjeev Singh, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) C.M. No.12676/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2744/2019 1. The petitioners assails the order dated 06.03.2019 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Delhi in SA No.53/2019 preferred by the petitioners. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has dealt with the application for interim relief moved by the petitioners to seek a restraint against the respondent, from taking physical possession of the residential property bearing No.M-21, 2nd Floor, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi-110024.2. The background facts are that the petitioners had availed two loan facilities to the tune of Rs.1,80,0...
Avish Gupta & Anr vs.state of Nct Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1473/2019 & CRL.M.As. 5846-5847/2019 AVISH GUPTA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay and Mr. Manoj, Advocates Versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neeelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Yogesh Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.166/2016, under Sections 354/323/5of IPC and cross FIR No.165/2016 under Sections 323/341/5of IPC both registered at police station Preet Vihar, Delhi are sought on the basis of Affidavit of 25th February, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be ...
Ajay Maken & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h December, 2018 Decided on:18. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11616/2015, CM APPLs.31234/15, 30& 106AJAY MAKEN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Aman Panwar with Mr. S.Kumar, Mr. Mudit Gupta, Mr. Nitin Saluja and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advocates for... Petitioner No.1. Senior Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Advocate with Ms. Anupradha Singh, Advocate for... Petitioner Nos.2 & 3. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG with Mr. Jagjit Singh, Mr. Om Prakash Ms. Snigdha Mehra, Advocates for Railways. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for Union of India (MoUD) Mr. Sanjay Ghose, ASC, GNCTD. Mr. Ravinder Chauhan, Advocate for DUSIB. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel for BSES/RPL with Mr. Aman Vidyarthi, Ms. Anju Thomas & Ms. Priyansha Indra, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU W.P.(C) 11616/2015 Page 1 of 104 CONTENTS i. Introduction......2 ii. Orders of...
Manju Choudhary vs.sudesh Lamba & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2019. CS(OS) 504/2018 & IA No.13888/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) MANJU CHOUDHARY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashish Updhayay, Advocate. Versus SUDESH LAMBA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate for D-1 and 3 to 6 with D-3&6 in person. Ms. Taru Gupta, Advocate for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The plaintiff has instituted this suit, for partition of and for rendition 1. of accounts with respect to, property No.217 Jor Bagh, New Delhi-3, pleading, (i) that the property No.217 Jor Bagh, New Delhi was auctioned on 7th March, 1953 in favour of the paternal grandfather of the plaintiff and the six defendants namely Late Sh. Captain Risal Singh and the said paternal grandfather of the plaintiff paid consideration for purchase of and raised construction of the suit property; (ii) that Sh. Gian Singh, father of the plaintiff and six defendants inherited a number of properties fr...
M/S s.j. Overseas vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 9626/2017 M/S S.J.OVERSEAS versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Pranav Rishi, Ms Astha Sharma and : Mr Vinod Kumar, : Mr Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with : Mr Upendra Sai, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 16.08.2017 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Appellate Authority, rejecting the petitioners appeal against an order dated 02.03.2017 passed by respondent no.2 (the Protector General, Emigration hereafter PGE). By the aforesaid order dated 02.03.2017, the PGE had upheld the decision to forfeit the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner and had rejected the petitioners request for revoking the said action. W.P.(C) No.9626/2017 Page 1 of 13 2. It is the petitioners case tha...
Sh. Gopal Mishra vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 18, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1451/2019 SH. GOPAL MISHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhas Kumar Jha and Mr. Sharad Chandra Jha, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus Through: Mr. .....Respondents Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajesh Kumar. Mr. Mohd. Anas, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 5773 /2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 5774/2019 (delay) There is delay of 30 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 1451/2019 Quashing of FIR No.268/2016, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC, registered at police station Moti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 27th May, 2017 reached between the parties. CRL.M.C. 1451/2019 Page 1 of 3 Upon notice, learned Additional Pub...
Mohan Lal Seth Charitable Trust vs.m/s Emson
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :19. h November, 2018 Date of decision :18. h March, 2019 RSA822016 MOHAN LAL SETH CHARITABLE TRUST ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.R. Sharma, Adv. Versus M/S EMSON Through: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant vide the present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 r.w. Section 104 and 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeks the setting aside of the order dated 06.06.2015 of the learned Additional District Judge, (Central-07), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi in MCA No.2/2015 vide which the said appeal filed by the appellant herein against the judgment dated 27.08.2013 was dismissed.2. Vide order dated 27.08.2013, the learned Civil Judge, Central- 15, returned the plaint qua Suit No.filed by the appellant herein as the plaintiff thereof whilst disposing of the preliminary issue framed on 04.06.2013 to the effect : - Whether the suit of the p...
Himachal Sorang Power Private Limited & Anr. Vs.ncc Infrastructure Hol ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (COMM) 12/2019 Reserved on:6. 2.2019 Pronounced on:13.3.2019 HIMACHAL SORANG POWER PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Padmaja Kaul, Mr. Ketan Gaur and Mr. Praharsh Johrey, Advs. NCC INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS LIMITED versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Nakul Dewan with Dr. Amit George, Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Ms. Neelu Mohan, Ms. Nooreen Sarna and Mr. Shivansh Soni, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.I.A. No.291/2019 Prefatory facts:1. The applicants before me are plaintiffs in a suit instituted by them for declaratory and permanent injunctive reliefs. In effect, the reliefs sought against the defendant both in the suit and the interlocutory application is to injunct the defendant from commencing arbitration proceedings. CS (COMM) 12/2019 Pg. 1 of 50 1.1 The defendant, it appears, seeks to commence arbitration proceedings for claiming incentive payment...
Shri Sandeep Silas vs.cbi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 01.2019. Date of Decision :15.03.2019. CRL.M.C. 3137/2017 SHRI SANDEEP SILAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Bishnoi, Mr.Mikhil Sharma, Mr.Mehtaab Singh Sandhu & Mr.Pratishth Kaushal, Advs. Versus CBI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Nikhil Goel, Spl.P.P. with Mr.Gurpreet Hora, Adv. for CBI. Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Adv. for CVC. Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Adv. for Railways. CRL.M.C. 3141/2017 SH. MS. CHALIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Bishnoi, Mr. Karan Khanuja, Mr. Shadman Ahmed & Mr.Tushar Agarwal, Advs. Versus CBI & ORS. Through: Mr.Nikhil Goel, ........ RESPONDENTS Spl.P.P. with Mr.Gurpreet Hora, Adv. for CBI. Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Adv. for CVC. Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Adv. for Railways. Crl.M.C. 3137/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 51 + + CRL.M.C.5094/2017 SH. MS CHALIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish B...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »