Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Food Corporation of India Mazdoor Union vs.food Corporation of India & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~19 & 20 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3097/2017 & CM APPLN. 13452/2017 19 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA MAZDOOR UNION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 14007/2018 & CM APPLN. 54764-54766/2018 20 DAMODAR YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA W.P.(C) 3097/2017 JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner union is espousing the cause of 171 workers working with Ghevra Depot of respondent No.1. According to the petitioner, 617 workers were working with respondent No.1 on contract basis in 1987. In April, 1991, contract labour system was abolished. The agreement dated 12th W.P.(C) 3097-2017 & 14007...
Ravinder Kumar Wali vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5122015 RAVINDER KUMAR WALI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajinder Wali, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Aditya Goyal and Mr. Seerat Deep Singh, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER1903.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 21st July 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting the Appellants W.P. (C) 6875 of 2015.2. The Appellant pleaded the following facts stated in the writ petition: (i) He was a permanent resident of the State of Jammu and Kashmir. On 28th September, 1983, he joined the office of the Controller General of Defence Accounts under the Ministry of Defence, and from 1983 to 1985 was posted at District Udhampur in Jammu and Kashmir. Thereafter, between March 1985 to February 1989, he was posted in Leh, also in Jammu and Kashmir. (ii) Between 1989 and 1992, the Appellant was ...
Sunita Mehta vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~R-94 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 792/2002 SUNITA MEHTA Decided on:-"19th March, 2019 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. along with the appellant. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT(ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (CC No.80/2002) of the second respondent, the appellant was put on trial and held guilty by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge by judgment dated 03.10.2002 on the accusations for offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the gravamen of the charge brought home against her concerning non payment in spite of notice of demand after dishonor of two cheques each for Rs.3,500/- issued by her in favour of the said second respondent.2. By the judgment dated 03.10.2002, the trial court held the appellant guilty and convicted her by order dated 07.10.2002. It awarded rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year wit...
Rajesh Chandna & Ors. Vs.aishani Chandna Mehra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 03.2019 FAO(OS) 51/2019 & CM APPL. 11494/2019 RAJESH CHANDNA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Shikhil Suri with Mr.Shiv Kumar Suri, Ms.Shilpa Saini, Advs. versus AISHANI CHANDNA MEHRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aman with Mr.Summer Sodhi, Ms.Aarxoo Aneja, Advs. Nandrajog CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) CAV2462019 Counsel for the respondent/caveator enters appearance. The caveat stands discharged. FAO(OS) 51/2019 & CM APPL. 11494/2019 1. The appellants, who were the defendants in the suit, have assailed the order dated 08.01.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A. No.12875/2018 preferred by the defendants under order 7 rule 11 CPC to seek rejection of the plaint. The learned Single Judge has, vide his detailed order, dismissed the said application. FAO(OS) 51/2019 Page 1 of 17 2. The respondent has preferred CS(OS)235/2018 to seek the relief of ...
Atul Gupta & Ors. Vs.s. Chand and Company Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 16, 2019 Pronounced on:March 19,2019 O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 79/2019 ATUL GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Ms. Liza M. Baruah, Mr. Vipin Tyagi and Ms. Akshita Katoch, Advocates. versus S. CHAND AND COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate for R-1 with Briefing Counsel Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Mr. Amol Sharma and Mr. Ateev Mathur, Advocates for R-2(HDFC Bank). JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeks order of injunction restraining... RESPONDENTS from encashing performance Bank Guarantee No.003GT01106008 dated 4th March 2016 of HDFC Bank (Respondent No.2), furnished by the... Petitioners in favour of Respondent No.1 for an amount of Rs. 10 crores. O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 79/2019 Page 1 of 23 Brief Background 2.... Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 are th...
Ce Info Systems Pvt Ltd and Anr vs.gas Authority of India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 807/2017 and CM Nos. 3726/2017 & 18236/2017 CE INFO SYSTEMS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Shaurya Sahay and Mr Chetan Joshi, Advocates. versus GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms Purnima Maheshwari and Mr D.K. Singh, Advocates for GAIL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1903.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 01.04.2016 passed by the respondent (hereafter GAIL), debarring the petitioner from participating in bidding process relating to any tender floated by GAIL, for a period of three years to be reckoned from the date of the said letter. The effect of the said letter is that the petitioner has been blacklisted till 01.04.2019.2. The aforesaid punitive measure was imposed on the petitioner on the basis of an allegation that the petitioner had submitted a forged certificate dated 10.05.2013, indicating that ...
Damodar Yadav vs.food Corporation of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~19 & 20 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3097/2017 & CM APPLN. 13452/2017 19 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA MAZDOOR UNION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 14007/2018 & CM APPLN. 54764-54766/2018 20 DAMODAR YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA W.P.(C) 3097/2017 JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner union is espousing the cause of 171 workers working with Ghevra Depot of respondent No.1. According to the petitioner, 617 workers were working with respondent No.1 on contract basis in 1987. In April, 1991, contract labour system was abolished. The agreement dated 12th W.P.(C) 3097-2017 & 14007...
Shafali R. Chopra vs.ifci Infrastructure Development Limited (Iidl) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 02.2019 Pronounced on:19. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 4495/2016 & CM APPLN. 10462/2017 SHAFALI R. CHOPRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Mr.Karma Dorjee, Mr. Vaibhav Tomar, Mr.Abhishek Roy and Ms.Shruti Choudhry, Advocates versus IFCI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED (IIDL) & ........ RESPONDENTS ORS Through: Mr. Rahul Narayanan, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Moazzam Khan, Mohammad Kamran and Mr.Brijesh Kumar, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the orders dated 29.12.2016 and 05.02.2016 passed by the respondent No.3. Consequently, restrained the said respondent for taking any further steps in terms of the orders mentioned above. W.P.(C) 4495/2016 Page 1 of 31 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a widow and has been in the business of hospitality for the past 29 years and has worked in various capa...
Jaideep & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 19, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1510/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5983/2019 JAIDEEP & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma & Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Advocates. Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Tej Ram. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.847/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Najafgarh, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 15th March, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Tej Ram on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2 present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been a...
Guddu @ Farman vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 721/2018 Decided on 19th March, 2019 GUDDU @ FARMAN ..... Appellant STATE Through: Ms. Sunita Arora, Adv. Versus Appellant produced from Jail. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Arguments heard and trial court record perused.2. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions of appellant, submits that the present appeal is pressed only on the point that offence under Section 397 IPC is not made out against the appellant on the evidence adduced on record; and at best offence under Section 392 IPC is made out. Page 1 of 8 3. A perusal of impugned judgment shows that appellant has been convicted under Section 397 IPC by the trial court primarily, by placing reliance on the statement of PW1-Gulshan (victim) which has been found trustworthy and reliable. Further, that statements of PW3 and PW4 corroborate the statement of PW1.4. I have also perus...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »