Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Makemy Trip (India) Private Limited vs.pravasi Guide Private Limited & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 7/2019 & I.A.No.200/2019 MAKEMY TRIP (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Abhishek Kotnala, and Ms. Malika Nandkloyer, Advocates. versus PRAVASI GUIDE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS ..... Defendants Through None Date of Decision:19. h March, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks, copyrights, passing off, dilution of goodwill, unfair competition, rendition of accounts of profits, damages, delivery up etc. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"60. In the circumstances aforesaid, the Plaintiff most respectfully prays that this Honble Court may be pleased to pass: (a) Decree for permanent the Defendants, its partners, directors, shareholders or proprietor as the case may be, its assigns in business, restraining injunction CS (COMM) 7/2019 Page 1 of 10 franchis...
Kiran Kumar Anand & Anr. Vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 19, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1517/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6010-11/2019 KIRAN KUMAR ANAND & ANR. Through: Mr. Mayank Sawhney, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Praveen Kumar. Ms. Kanika Sawhney, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. Ms. Vandana Anand, Advocate for respondents No.3 to 4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.338/2016, under Sections 323/ 506/4IPC, registered at police station K.N. Katju Marg, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 1st August, 2017 (Annexure P-10) and affidavit of 6th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1...
S P vs.m
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. h of March, 2019 Through: Mr. K.B. Hina, Advocate. ..... Appellant S P % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 83/2019 CORAM: versus M Through: None. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL125672019 (exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL125682019 (delay in filing) & CM APPL125692019 (delay in re-filing) 3. These applications have been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of delay in re-filing and filing the present appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the applications, prayers made in the applications are allowed. Delay of 86 days in filing and 7 days in re- filing the appeal is condoned.5. The applications stand disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 83/2019 & CM APPL125662019 (stay) 6. The present appeal arises out of an interim order dated 12.10.2018 passed by the Family Court on an applicati...
State (govt.of Nct of Delhi) vs.amit Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~67 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h March, 2019 CRL.LP. 607/2018 STATE (GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State Versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS. Through: None. ....Respondent SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J (ORAL) C.M. No.324(for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. C.M. No.324(delay in filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 21 days in filing the present leave petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 607/2018 1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,(hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 15.05.2018 passed by the learned Trial Court in Case FIR No.registered at Police Station Qutub Minar Metro Station, New Delhi, whereby the respondents (accused before the Trial Court) were acquitted of the charges punishable under Section ...
Virender Palsingh vs.central Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of decision:19. 03.2019 W.P.(C) 12942/2018 & C.M. No.50232/2018 VIRENDER PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Adv. with Mr.Prateek Kumar Adv. versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Through Ms.Seema Gupta, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner, aggrieved by the order dated 28.11.2018 passed by the learned Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Delhi in Miscellaneous Appeal No.562/2018 arising out of SA No.374/2018 (wrongly typed in the impugned order as OA No.374/2018), wherein the petitioners prayer for grant of interim relief was declined. On that day, the learned DRAT considered the petitioners submissions on the aspect of pre-deposit. The contention of the petitioner was that, as against the demand raised by the respondent/bank under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Recons...
Amresh Sharma vs.director General, Border Security Force
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2019 % + W.P.(C) 5951/2014 AMRESH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Warisa Farasat and Ms. Rudrakshi Deo, Advs. versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, BORDER SECURITY FORCE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Kriti Awasthi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated January 06, 2014 passed by the Central Information Commission (CIC, in short) whereby the CIC has allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner herein partially inasmuch as it has directed the CPIO of the respondent Organization to provide the documents at point No.(i), (ii) and (vi) to the petitioner herein and denied the documents at point No.(iii), (iv) and (v) on the ground that the same attracts Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005. W.P.(C) No.5951/2014 Page 1 of 10 2. Suffice it to state that the information, which was sought by the petitioner f...
Rohtash Singh vs.new Zone Buildtech Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2019. CS(OS) 546/2016 & IAs No.13256/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 13258/2016 (for condonation of delay) & 3327/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ROHTASH SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mahesh Singh, Adv. Versus Through: Mr. Badal Dayal, Adv. for D-1&2. ..... Defendants NEW ZONE BUILDTECH PVT LTD & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit against defendants No.1 to 4 namely (i) New Zone Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.; (ii) Mohan Kumar; (iii) Dharambir; and, (iv) Sub-Registrar-VIB, Alipur, Delhi, for (a) declaration that the Sale Deed dated 7th February, 2013 executed by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant No.1 New Zone Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. with respect to agricultural land of the plaintiff bearing Khasra No.4(4-16), 8(4-11), 13(4-16), 18(4-16), 23(4-16), 49/15/6(3-00), 50/9(4-16), 11(4-16), 12(4-16) & 13(0-07) situated in the revenue estate of Village Dariyapur Kalan, New Delhi i...
State vs.guddu Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h March, 2019 CRL.LP. 603/2018 STATE ....Appellant Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with W/SI Manisha Versus GUDDU PAL... RESPONDENTThrough: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J (ORAL) CRL. L. P. 603/2018 1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 18.05.2018 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge-01, Special Court (POCSO) South East District, Saket Court, New Delhi, whereby the respondent (accused before the Trial Court) was acquitted of the charge punishable under Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO). CRL.LP. 603/2018 Page 1 of 10 2. Brief facts of the case are as under:-"(i) That DD No.26-A was registered at Police Station New Friends Colony on 19.03...
Pushpa & Ors. Vs.ram Avatar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 03.2019 CRL.REV.P. 374/2017 CRL.M.A. 8510/2017, 8512/2017 PUSHPA & ORS. versus RAM AVATAR .....Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Mr. Brahm Kumar Pandey, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 8510/2017 (condonation of delay in refiling) CRL.M.A. 8512/2017 (condonation of delay in filing) 1. Condonation of delay in refiling and filing the revision petition is sought by petitioners on the ground that petitioner No.1 is an uneducated lady and not conversant with the legal process and the proceedings were being looked after by her brother, who was suffering from kidney problem and was hospitalized from time to time and was in a serious condition because of which the present petition could not be file...
Ramesh Kumar vs.narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 19, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1652/2018 RAMESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Abhir Datt & Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocates Versus NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.S. Arora, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR... Petitioner seeks bail in Complaint Case No.VIII/31/DZU/17, ORDER registered by Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), under Sections 8(c), 20 & 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (henceforth referred to as the NDPS Act) while claiming to be innocent. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that Narcotic Control Bureau (NCB) arrested father of petitioner and by exercising undue pressure on petitioner, his statement under Section 67 of NDPS Act has been recorded, which in any case does not incriminate petitioner. It is submitted that there is nothing on record to show that petitioner had connived with his co-accused in transportation of 6.2kg of chara...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »