Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N Sai Balaji & Ors vs.jawaharlal Nehru University & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:14. h March, 2019 Pronounced on:20. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2370/2019 & CM APPL No.11060/2019 N SAI BALAJI & ORS ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Akhil Sibal, Sr Advocate with Mr.Govind Manoharan, Mr.Abhik Chimni and Ms.Shriya Mishra, Advocates. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ANR versus Through : Ms.Monika Arora, ........ RESPONDENTS Standing Counsel and Mr.Kushal Kumar, Mr.Harsh Ahuja and Mr.Parveen Singh, Advocates for JNU. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the... Petitioners the elected office bearers to the JNUSU; b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Item i under "Any other matter" as the 278th Executive Meeting h...
Ashoka Kumar Sureka, Partner Sureka International Kanpur vs.union of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~24 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 03.2019 ARB.P. 696/2017 ........ Petitioner ASHOKA KUMAR SUREKA, PARTNER SUREKA INTERNATIONAL KANPUR UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through Mr. B.S. Mathur, Adv. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain and Ms. Rashmi Kumari, Advs. alongwith Mr. Vinay Gupta, UDC in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 1996 Act) for appointment of an Arbitrator.2. There is no dispute as to the existence of an arbitration agreement obtaining between the petitioner, which is a partnership firm, and respondent no.1 i.e. Union of India (UOI).3. To be noted, respondent no.2 is the Director General, DGOS. 3.1 According to me, respondent no.2 is neither a proper nor a necessary party.4. 5. Accordingly, respondent no.2 is deleted from the array of parties. The record shows that notice in the cap...
Dlf Home Developers Ltd & Anr. Vs.delhi International Airport Ltd & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~25. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 03.2019 W.P.(C) 2771/2019 DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LTD & ANR Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Meghna Mishra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur and Ms. Aishwarya Mohapatra, Advs. versus DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD & ANR..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Vijaylakshmi Menon, Mr. Anish Kapur, Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani, Ms. Suman Yadav, Mr. Dhritiman Roy, Mr. Shobhit Ahuja, Advs. for R1. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kustubh Singh, Adv. for AAI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.12799/2019 W.P.(C.) No.2771/2019 Page 1 of 8 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2771/2019 & C.M. No.12797/2019, C.M. No.12798/2019 1. We have heard learned Senior Counsels for the petitioner and respondent Nos. 1 and...
Prem Ram & Ors. Vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 19, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1516/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6001/2019 PREM RAM & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sumit Gaba, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Vikas Sahu.... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.56/2018, under SectionsIPC, registered at police station Naraina, Delhi is sought by petitioners on the basis of affidavits of respondents No.2 & 3. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2 is the father and respondent No.3 is the wife of deceased- Mottu @ Ram Kripal and they have been identified to be so, by SI Vikas Sahu on the basis of identity proof produced by them.... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 present in the Court, submit that the incident in question was purely accidential. They submit that t...
Unique Infoways Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.m/s Mps Telecom Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.No.4672/2015 & Crl.M.A. Nos.16754/2015, 1791/2017 Judgment reserved on :19. 03. 2018 Date of decision :14. 3.2019 UNIQUE INFOWAYS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Randhir Jain and Mr.Dhanjani Jain, Advocates versus M/S MPS TELECOM PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Adv with Mr.Parvez Alam, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioners of the present petition, namely, (1) Unique Infoways Pvt. Ltd. through its director Vipul Jain, (2) Vipul Jain (Director) and Ms.Usha Jain (Director) arrayed as petitioners No.1 ,2 and 3 vide the present petition seek the setting aside of the order dated 1.6.2015 of the learned Trial Court of the MM (N.I.Act)-02 (South- East), Saket in CC No.1529/2015 vide which the three petitioners herein arrayed as the three accused in CC No.1529/2015 in a complaint filed by the respondent herein as complainant thereof were su...
P N vs.g G
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:19. 03.2019 + MAT.APP. (F.C.) 31/2018 and C.M. 9575/2019 P N G G ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jasmine Damkewala & Vaishali Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person versus Through: Mr. ..... Respondent Prashant Mendiratta & Mr.Aayush Agarwal, Advocates with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 18.12.2017 passed by the 1. Family Court. The appellant is aggrieved with the observations and the directions of the Family Court that the mother has not acted in the interest of the minor child and has unauthorisedly shifted the child to a school in Faridabad from Carmel Convent School, Delhi and removed the child outside the jurisdiction of this Court.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the mother was forced to shift the child from Carmel Convent School to Manav Rachna International School, F...
Mallcom (India) Limited & Anr vs.rakesh Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2019. CS(COMM) 480/2016, IA No.5571/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.12236/2017 (of D-4&5 u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC r/w S- 151 CPC), IA No.12890/2018 (of D-4&5 u/O XI R-10 CPC) & IA No.12370/2018 (u/S151CPC). MALLCOM (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Saurabh Banerjee, Mr. Debjyoti Sarkar, Mr. Afzal B. Khan & Mr. Ashutosh, Advs. Versus RAKESH KUMAR & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Mr. D.K. Yadav & Ms. Kamla, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The two plaintiffs i.e. Mallcom (India) Ltd. and Mallcom Safety Pvt. Ltd., being the proprietors of the registered trade mark (Label), in respect of safety equipment, more particularly safety shoes, have instituted this suit to restrain the defendants no.1 and 2 i.e. Rakesh Kumar and Manoj Kumar from carrying on business in the name and style of defendant no.3 M.K. Sales Corporation and the defendants no.4 and 5 viz. Adeeba Int...
Hindustan Cleanenergy Limited vs.urja Associates & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:19. 3.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 12/2018 1. HINDUSTAN CLEANENERGY LIMITED Through: Mr. Tarun Singla, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus URJA ASSOCIATES & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anju Jain with Mr. Hitesh Sachar and Mr. Rishi Pal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act).2. 3.4. Notice in this petition was issued on 2.2.2018. The respondents resist the extension of time. I must also indicate that in between parties had taken time to settle their inter se disputes. This endeavour was made both before this Court as well as before the learned Arbitrator. Since, the settlement has not been firmed up, the petitioner has pressed for disposal of the captioned petition.5. Ms. Jain, who, appears for the respondents, at the outset, says that no relief can be given in the ...
Cbre South Asia Pvt. Ltd. Vs.fiitjee
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 34/2019 CBRE SOUTH ASIA PVT. LTD. FIITJEE Through: Mr. Vaibhav Mishra, Advocate versus Through: Mr.Sandeep Sharma and Mr. Hunny ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Veer Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER1903.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act for short) with the following prayers:-"Centre Arbitration (a) Pass an order under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 r/w Section 151 of The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 thereby appointing a Sole Arbitrator from Delhi the Delhi International Arbitration Centre as per International (Arbitration Proceedings) Rules 2018 to adjudicate the dispute between the parties on account of the blatant non- payment of the invoices raised by the... Petitioner to the Respondent; (b) To suspend the arbitration proceedings between the parties before the Ld....
State(govt of Nct of Delhi) vs.shankar Kamat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2019
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h March, 2019 CRL.LP. 337/2018 STATE(GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Appellant Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with W/SI Manisha, PS New Friends Colony Versus SHANKAR KAMAT... RESPONDENTThrough: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J (ORAL) CRL. L. P. 337/2018 1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 09.03.2018 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge-01, Special Court (POCSO) South East District, Saket Courts Complex, New Delhi, whereby the respondent (accused before the Trial Court) was acquitted of the charge punishable under Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO).2. Brief facts of the case are as under:-"(i) That DD No.39-A was registered at Police Sta...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »