Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Singh & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6451/2015 RAJ SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate for Standing R-1/UOI. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Mrinalini Sharma, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER2003.2019 1. The prayers in the present petition read as under: (i) Issue a writ, of certiorari and/or any other writ, order or direction of the similar nature declaring the entire acquisition with respect of khasra no.53/21(141.6 sq.yards) and (346 sq. yards) situated in the revenue Estate of Village Karala Delhi, having lapsed and further quashing the impugned notification No.F.11(19)/01/L&B/LA/20112 dated 21.03.2003 issued under section 4, Notification No.F.ll(19)...
Alim Saifi & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1539/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6143-44/2019 ALIM SAIFI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aslam Malik, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public .....Respondents Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Vikrant. Mr. Mohd. S.Malik, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.251/2017, under Section 3IPC, registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 8th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Vikrant, on the basis of identity ...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.sunita Namdev & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h March, 2019 versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr.R.K. Tripathi, Advocate SUNITA NAMDEV & ORS THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD + MAC.APP. 1062/2017 & CAV10412017 & CM APPL. 44006/2017 21 + MAC.APP. 1071/2018 & CM APPL. 50086/2018 55 SUNITA NAMDEV & ORS Through: Mr.C.M. Patel, Advocate Through: Mr.C.M. Patel, Advocate RAMJI BHAI PATEL @ SHERE PATEL & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ) Through: Mr.R.K. Tripathi, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants versus $~21 & 55 * % 1. JUDGEMENT (ORAL) Both the parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.21,01,000/- has been awarded by the Claims Tribunal.2. The accident dated 02nd December, 2012 resulted in the death of Santosh Namdev. The deceased aged 28 years at the time of the accident and was working as a tailor. It was claimed that deceased was earning Rs.15,000/- per month. The deceased was survived by his widow, ...
Ravinder Singh & Ors. Vs.the Lt. Governor & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9353/2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr.N.Prabhakar & Mr. Dhruv versus Sharma, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain & Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/ L& B Mr. Ashutosh Ghade & Mr. N.Goel, Advocates for Respondent/DDA RAVINDER SINGH & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA THE LT. GOVERNOR & ORS. ORDER2003.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayers in the petition read as under: a. Issue a writ of declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land in khasra No.1min (5 Bigha 14 Biswas) in the village Lado Sarai have lapsed in terms of the section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition (Rehabilitation and Resettlement) Act 2013; b. issue a writ of mandamus or any suitable directions to the respondent No.4 who also happens to maintain record of rights to make/cause the revenue record/record of rights in favor of the petitioners a...
Anil Kumar Upadhyay vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11543/2018 & CM APPL. 44675/2018 PARVESH PANDIT A. K. A RAM PARVESH Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus $~25 to32 * + + + ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Sachin N.Advocate Mr .Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr . Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA W.P.(C) 11549/2018 & CM APPL. 44692/2018 NEELAM DEVI Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. versus Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-2 W.P.(C) 11553/2018 & CM APPL. 44697/2018 ASHOK KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) 11543 of 2018 and batch Page 1 of 8 + + Through: Mr. Anukri...
Devender Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1548/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6188/2019 DEVENDER SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. R.N.Sharma, Advocates. .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Sunil. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.362/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Palam Village, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 11th January, 2019 (Annexure P/7) and affidavit of 18th March, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Sunil on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between...
Commisisoner of Income Tax Delhi vs.sunil Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:20. h March, 2019 + COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ITA4652003 .... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Pankaj Sinha, Advocate. SUNIL LAMBA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha, Ms. Devika Jain & Mr. Anant Mann, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the Revenue, under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) is directed against an order dated 7th May, 2003 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the ITA No.3006/Del/2000 for the Assessment Year (AY) 1995-96. Questions of law 2. While admitting this appeal on 7th February, 2005 the following questions of law were framed by this Court: ITA No.465/2003 Page 1 of 12 1. Whether the Tribunal is correct in law in holding that assumption of jurisdiction by the CIT, under Section 263 of...
In the Matter of Iyogi Technical Services Private Limited Vs.......... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:01. 11.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:20. 03.2019 CO.APPL.(M) 135/2016 IN THE MATTER OF IYOGI TECHNICAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sandeep Aggarwal, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Aakanksha Kaul, Advs. for petitioner. Mr.Jayant Mehta, Ms.Anjali Dwivedi, Ms.Simran Brar, Mr.Srisatya Mohanty and Ms.Anjali Dwivedi, Advs. for DLF Assets Pvt. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.CO.APPL.(M) 135/2016 & CA11072018 & 1109/2018 1. This application has been filed under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1959 for dispensing with the meeting of shareholder and convening a meeting of secured and unsecured creditors of the applicant company and to pass an order approving and implementing the proposed scheme of arrangement to pay to the creditors. The case of the petitioners is that the applicant company was incorporated on 28.2.2007 as a private limited company which was engaged in the business of provid...
Chalitar Rai vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11543/2018 & CM APPL. 44675/2018 PARVESH PANDIT A. K. A RAM PARVESH Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus $~25 to32 * + + + ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Sachin N.Advocate Mr .Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr . Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA W.P.(C) 11549/2018 & CM APPL. 44692/2018 NEELAM DEVI Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. versus Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-2 W.P.(C) 11553/2018 & CM APPL. 44697/2018 ASHOK KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) 11543 of 2018 and batch Page 1 of 8 + + Through: Mr. Anukri...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs.gopal Das Estates & Housing pvt.ltd .
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA5482010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, .... Appellant Jr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue. versus GOPAL DAS ESTATES & HOUSING PVT.LTD . ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms.Gargi Sethee, Advocates. CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER2003.2019 1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) is directed against the judgment dated 22nd May 2009 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.5531/Del/2004 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2001-02.2. While admitting this appeal on 13th May 2010, this Court framed the following questions of law for consideration: (a) Whether ITAT was correct in law in allowing compensation amounting to Rs.90,68,995/- paid by the assessee to its clients over for surrendering the allotment of space over and above the cost of shops/space as revenue expenditure?. (b) Whethe...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »