Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S V2 Retail Limited vs.m/s s.s. Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:20. 03.2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 290/2018 M/S V2 RETAIL LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma & Mr. Pranav Verma, Advocate versus M/S S.S. ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Nagar & Mr. Bhanu Sanoriya & Mr. Arun Nagpal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) FAO(OS) (COMM) 290/2018 and C.M. Appl. No.51343/2018 (for stay) 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant assailing the order dated 26.10.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in O.M.P. (COMM) 64/2017 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and has upheld the Award dated 27.12.2012 passed by the FAO (OS) (COMM) No.290/2018 Page 1 of 15 learned Arbitrator except for the rate of interest which has been reduced to 8% instead of 12% per annum awarded ...
Ashok Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11543/2018 & CM APPL. 44675/2018 PARVESH PANDIT A. K. A RAM PARVESH Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus $~25 to32 * + + + ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Sachin N.Advocate Mr .Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr . Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA W.P.(C) 11549/2018 & CM APPL. 44692/2018 NEELAM DEVI Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. versus Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-2 W.P.(C) 11553/2018 & CM APPL. 44697/2018 ASHOK KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) 11543 of 2018 and batch Page 1 of 8 + + Through: Mr. Anukri...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs.gopal Das Estates & Housing pvt.ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA55/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Jr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue versus GOPAL DAS ESTATES & HOUSING PVT.LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms.Gargi Sethee, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER2003.2019 1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) is directed against the judgment dated 27thFebruary 2009 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.1642/Del/2008 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2005-06.2. While admitting this appeal on 28thJanuary 2010, this Court framed the following questions of law for consideration: a) Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in deleting the addition of Rs 59,13,958/- and Rs 24,94,144/- paid by the assessee on account of interest and bank guarantee commission respectively to the bank as business e...
Shahrukh @ Billu & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1530/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6092/2019 SHAHRUKH @ BILLU & ORS. Through: Mr. M.M.Ansari, Advocate. .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Vinit Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.143/2014, under Sections 323/324/3IPC, registered at police station Harsh Vihar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 16th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 supporting this petition. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by SI Vinit Kumar, on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the Crl.M.A. 1530/2019 Page 1 of 3 misunder...
Sanofi India Ltd. And Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20.03.2019 + W.P.(C) 7589/2018 and CM Nos. 28999/2018 & 44988/2018 SANOFI INDIA LTD. AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. WITH + W.P.(C) 7619/2018 SANOFI INDIA LTD. AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 7632/2018 and CM No.29189/2018 WITH SANOFI INDIA LTD. AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND + W.P.(C) 7634/2018 SANOFI INDIA LTD. & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 7589/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 26 Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioners :Mr Gaurab Banerji, Senior Advocate with Mr Manoj, Ms Aparna Sinha, Mr Mohit Pandey and Mr S.P. Mukherjee in W.P.(C) 7589/2018. Mr Manoj and Ms Aparna Sinha in W.P.(C) Nos. 7619/2018, 7632/2018 & 7634/2018. For theRespondents CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Mr...
Sanofi India Ltd. And Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20.03.2019 + W.P.(C) 7589/2018 and CM Nos. 28999/2018 & 44988/2018 SANOFI INDIA LTD. AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. WITH + W.P.(C) 7619/2018 SANOFI INDIA LTD. AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 7632/2018 and CM No.29189/2018 WITH SANOFI INDIA LTD. AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND + W.P.(C) 7634/2018 SANOFI INDIA LTD. & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 7589/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 26 Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioners :Mr Gaurab Banerji, Senior Advocate with Mr Manoj, Ms Aparna Sinha, Mr Mohit Pandey and Mr S.P. Mukherjee in W.P.(C) 7589/2018. Mr Manoj and Ms Aparna Sinha in W.P.(C) Nos. 7619/2018, 7632/2018 & 7634/2018. For theRespondents CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Mr...
Rani Devi Upadhyay vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11543/2018 & CM APPL. 44675/2018 PARVESH PANDIT A. K. A RAM PARVESH Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus $~25 to32 * + + + ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Sachin N.Advocate Mr .Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr . Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA W.P.(C) 11549/2018 & CM APPL. 44692/2018 NEELAM DEVI Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. versus Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-2 W.P.(C) 11553/2018 & CM APPL. 44697/2018 ASHOK KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) 11543 of 2018 and batch Page 1 of 8 + + Through: Mr. Anukri...
I Venturs Capital Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bombay Stock Exchange
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h March, 2019 % + W.P.(C) 2816/2019, CM Nos. 13100-13101/2019 I VENTURS CAPITAL PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Adv. versus BOMBAY STOCK EXCHANGE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pratap Venugopal and Ms. Surekha Raman, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM. No.13101/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2816/2019 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: Thus in the light of the aforesaid facts, circumstances, and grounds averred hereinabove it is humbly prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to: a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to desist from seeking deposit of the awarded amount from the petitioner in terms of bye-law 18 of the bye-laws and in terms of...
Mascot Engineering Company Ltd vs.eastern Medikit Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:20. 03.2019 CO.PET. 516/2012 MASCOT ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD ........ Petitioner versus EASTERN MEDIKIT LTD ..... Respondent Through and Through Mr.Kunal Sharma, Adv. for the OL. Mr.Manik Dogra, Mr.Santosh Pandey Mr.Rahul Pandey, Advs. for Ex. Directors. Mr.S.K.Chaturvedi and Mr.Vishnu S.Pillai Advs. for Ex.Director Mohinder Singh Paul. Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Nishi Ranjan Singh, Adv. for Ex.Director Karun Roy Narang. Dr.Manmohan Sharma, Adv. for EML Employees Welfare Munch. Mr.Manish Kumar and Mr.Y.Sarat Chandra, Advs. for applicants in CA19412013. Mr.Aditya Madan, Adv. for Union Bank of India. Mr.A.K.Mishra, Adv. for Trade Union CAs.292/2018, 2013/2016 and OLR9182014 in CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.CA19482017 & 297/2018 1. CA19482017 is filed under section 391 of the Companies Act praying to recall the winding up order and to approve revival of the company M/s. Eastern Medikit Limited (EM...
Parvesh Pandit A. K. A Ram Parvesh vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11543/2018 & CM APPL. 44675/2018 PARVESH PANDIT A. K. A RAM PARVESH Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus $~25 to32 * + + + ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Sachin N.Advocate Mr .Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr . Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA W.P.(C) 11549/2018 & CM APPL. 44692/2018 NEELAM DEVI Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. versus Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-2 W.P.(C) 11553/2018 & CM APPL. 44697/2018 ASHOK KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) 11543 of 2018 and batch Page 1 of 8 + + Through: Mr. Anukri...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »