Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravinder vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 to 39 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7362/2016 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 7372/2016 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P. (C) 7362 of 2016 and batch Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 7373/2016 DEVENDER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Meh...
Shri Inderjeet Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 03.2019 % W.P.(C) 11856/2015 SHRI INDERJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) of to quash certiorari 1. By the instant writ petition, the petitioner, in effect, seeks issuance of a writ communication No.F.33 (64)/06/2004/L&B/Alt./6857 dated 07.07.2015 issued by the respondents, whereby, an application made by the petitioner for his substitution in place of the original recorded owner Smt. Surinder Kaur, seeking an alternative plot in lieu of the acquired land, was rejected. the 2. To cut short the factual conspectus, which gave rise to the filing of the instant writ petition, advertance to the impugned communication would substantially serve the purpose, which is, as under:-"W.P.(C) 11856/2015 Page 1 of 7 ...
Ramesh Kumar & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9309/2014 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate $~46, 47, 59 * + RAMESH KUMAR & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus + DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 12/2015 Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 616/2016 + RAJESH KUMAR YADAV & ANR. Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 9309/2014& Ors. Page 1 of 8 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti ...
M/S m.v.r Industry Limited vs.m/s Tribal Cooperative Marketing
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h March, 2019 M/S M.V.R INDUSTRY LIMITED O.M.P. 379/2009 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Mishra and Mr. P. I. Jose, Advocates. (M:9999235354) M/S TRIBAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Buddy A. Ranganadhan, Mr. Raunak Jain, Mr. Vishvendra Tomar and Mr. Rohan Ahlawat, Advocates (M:9810143840) with Mr. N. L. Jangid D M, AR in person. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) has been filed challenging the award dated 20th May, 2005 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator.2. The Tribal Cooperative Marketing Development Federation of India Limited (hereinafter, TRIFED), is a Multi-State Cooperative Society of the Government of India, which is engaged in the procurement/storage/ processing of agro based products collected/grown by tribals throughout India. The contr...
Sandeep Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1082/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 03.2019 NIRMALA DEVI & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS + BAIL APPLN. 1292/2018 SANDEEP KUMAR versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Ranbir Yadav and Mr. P. Raj, Advs. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Sunny Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2503.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.963/2015 under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of the IPC, Police Station Mukherjee BAIL APPLN. 1082/2018 & 1292/2018 Page 1 of 3 Nagar, New Delhi. The petitioners are the parents-in-law as well as brother-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and a suicide note has been recovered which has exonerated...
Sh. Abdul Kalim & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 25, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1554/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6237/2019 DEVENDER KUMAR @ DHIRENDER & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kunwar Nagendra & Mr. Narender Kumar, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-Statewith ASI Ravinder Kumar. Mr. Manzar Anis & Ms. Sanjana Premi, Advocates with respondents No.2 to 4 in person. CRL.M.C. 1537/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6136/2019 SH. ABDUL KALIM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manzar Anis & Ms. Sanjana STATE & ORS. Premi, Advocates. Versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Ravinder Kumar. Mr. Kunwar Nagendra & Mr. Narender Kumar, Advocates with respondents No.2 to 6 in person. CRL.M.C. 1554/2019 CRL.M.C. 1537/2019 Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned first petition [CRL.M.C. 1554/2019]., quashing of ...
A K vs.c M
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:25. h of March, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 329/2018 & C.M.54109/2018 A K C M CORAM: Through: Mr.Prashant Mendiratta, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr.Sahil Munjal and Mr.Rohit Tyagi, ..... Respondent Advocates HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the interim order dated 22.10.2018 passed by the Family Court on an application filed by the appellant-father under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act. As per the order, the appellant-father has been allowed visitation on every second and fourth Saturday of the month from 11 a.m. to second and fourth Sunday respectively up to 4 p.m.2. The brief facts of the case to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 08.03.2008 at New Delhi as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. One daughter was born on 19.05.2008 out of the...
Anirudh Kumar vs.jagat Narain & Sons Huf & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 291/2017 ANIRUDH KUMAR Date of Decision:25. 03.2019 ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Anita Sahani, Adv. $~OS-2 % + versus JAGAT NARAIN & SONS HUF & ORS Through None ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The suit is filed by the plaintiff for specific performance against the defendant for sale of the property bearing No.1193, Chah Rahat Jama Masjid, Delhi-110006 (herein after referred to as the suit property). Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. This court issued notice to the defendants by order dated 21.04.2017. Thereafter, learned counsels for the defendants entered appearance. This court on 27.11.2017 noted the submissions of the learned counsel for defendant No.3 and 3a and directed deletion of defendant No.1, 2a, 2b and 3 to 6 as parties to the present suit. Therefore, this suit now is only against defendant No.2, namely, Smt. Lata Mehra.3. None appeared on behalf of the defendant No.2 nor...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.nalwa Sons Investment Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2019
$~41 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + ITA11422018 ITA11442018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Asheesh Jain, Sr.Std.Counsel with Date of Order:26. 03.2019 Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Jr.Std.Counsel versus NALWA SONS INVESTMENT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Vohra, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Kavita Jha, Ms.Devika Jain & Mr.Anant Mann, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, (Open Court) 1. These two appeals are preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (the Act hereafter); they challenge an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to two assessment years concerning the assessee-respondent.2. In ITA11422018, three questions of law are urged (i) with respect to the disallowance (under Section 14A) directed to be deleted by the ITAT; (ii) the write-off of principal amount of bad debts, which had been initially disallowed by the assessin...
Mithai Lal vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11543/2018 & CM APPL. 44675/2018 PARVESH PANDIT A. K. A RAM PARVESH Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus $~25 to32 * + + + ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Sachin N.Advocate Mr .Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr . Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA W.P.(C) 11549/2018 & CM APPL. 44692/2018 NEELAM DEVI Through: Mr. Anukrit Prateek and Mr. versus Satasmita, Advocates ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Pratyush Miglani and Ms. HIba Rabia Shah, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-2 W.P.(C) 11553/2018 & CM APPL. 44697/2018 ASHOK KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) 11543 of 2018 and batch Page 1 of 8 + + Through: Mr. Anukri...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »