Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharampal and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 to 39 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7362/2016 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 7372/2016 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P. (C) 7362 of 2016 and batch Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 7373/2016 DEVENDER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Meh...
Jagroop Singh Gill vs.the State (n.c.t of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:19th March, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:25th March, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 570/2019 JAGROOP SINGH GILL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Satvinder Singh, Adv. versus THE STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Iti Pandey, Adv for Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC(Crl.) with SI Rajiv Gulati, PS IGI Airport. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.168/2018, under Section 25/of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station IGI Airport, New Delhi.2. The brief facts of the case are that on 03.04.2018 the petitioner was travelling from Delhi to Toronto, by Air Canada flight No.AC-043 and during the course of screening, 01 cartridge was detected inside W.P (CRL)570/2019 Page 1 of 7 his check in baggage by the security personnel at IGI Airpor...
Sube Singh vs.lt Governor Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~40, 41, 66 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7973/2016 SUBE SINGH Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P.(C) 8228/2016 KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P.(C) 8224/2016 SATISH KUMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P. (C) Nos. 7973, 8228 and 8224 of 2016 Page 1 of 11 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER2503.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. In all these peti...
Prakash Katiyar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~70 to 73 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 868/2018 Through: Ms.Nandadevi Deka, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with W/C A.K.Chauhan with JWO S.M.Pal, Air Force. Mr.Jagat Arora with Ms.Ritu Arora & Mr.Murad Khan, Advocates for R3/IBPS. W.P.(C) 3637/2018 & CM APPL. 14443/2018 Through: Mr.Manoj Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MANOJ KUMAR UNION OF INDIA & ORS + versus CPL RAHUL KUMAR SANTOSHI UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. + PRAKASH KATIYAR versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr.Aditya Madaan & Mr.Devank Maheshwari, Advocates for UOI/R1 to R3. W.P.(C) 6300/2018 & CM APPL. 24243/2018 Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) Nos. 868,3637, 6300 & 8189 of 2018 page 1 of 24 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with W/C A.K.Chauhan with JWO S.M.Pal, Air Force. Ms.Praveena Gautam with Mr.Jitesh P.Gupta, Mr.Pawan Shukla & Mr.Raja R...
M/S Laxyo Energy Ltd. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12784/2018 & CM Appl. Nos.49648/2018 & 49874/2018 M/S LAXYO ENERGY LTD. Through: Mr.Kushagra Bansal, Advocate ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC for R-1. versus Mr.Kapil Gupta & Ms.Muskan Gupta, Advocates for R-2. Mr.Ajay Pal Singh, Mr.Abhinav Garg & Mr.Shashwat Sharma, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. This writ petition concerns an e-tender issued by respondent No.2 bearing No.WAP/WRD/GOR/2018-19/01, dated 11.10.2018. The petitioner has challenged the rejection of its bid on the ground that it had failed to submit a demand draft towards the cost of the tender documents, as required by the Notice Inviting Tender [hereinafter referred to as "NIT"]..2. The following extracts of the NIT are relevant for adjudication of the present petition: W.P.(C) 12784/20...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs.sh. Jagdish Prasad Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~31 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :25. h March, 2019 ITA6582018 & CM Nos.23732-34/2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus SH. JAGDISH PRASAD GUPTA ..... Respondent Through : Dr. Shashwat Bajpai and Mr.Sharad Agarwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The Revenue in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act questions the decision of the ITAT for Assessment Years 2007-08. The Revenue contends especially that the sum of Rs.2.60 crores claimed by the assessee and ultimately allowed, as enhanced licence fee for the relevant year, was impermissible and ought not to have been allowed deduction in view of Section 43B(a) of the Income Tax Act. The facts of the present case are identical to the batch of appeals decided by this court and applicable to A.Y. 1997-98; 2002- 03; 2004-05 and 2009-10 [Jagdish P...
Achla Sabharwal vs.a. Saptrishi Films & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved on:30. 01.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:25. .03.2019 FAO402017 & CM No.2669/2017 ACHLA SABHARWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.N.K. Bhardwaj & Mr.Bikash Ghorai, Advocates. Versus A. SAPTRISHI FILMS & ORS. R-1. Mr. Vikram Mehta and Through: Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddique, Adv. for ..... Respondent Mr. Saurobroto dutta, Adv. for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J:1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 104 read with Order 43 Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the impugned order dated 22.12.2016 passed in Suit No.888/2016 by the court of Ld. Additional District Judge-3, Central District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (ADJ) by which the plaint was ordered to be returned to the appellant/plaintiff to be presented before the court of competent jurisdiction. FAO402017 Page 1 of 8 2. The facts leading up to the filing of the Plaint are that the respondent no.1 b...
Devender and Anr vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 to 39 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7362/2016 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 7372/2016 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P. (C) 7362 of 2016 and batch Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 7373/2016 DEVENDER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Meh...
Rajesh Kumar Yadav & Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9309/2014 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate $~46, 47, 59 * + RAMESH KUMAR & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus + DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 12/2015 Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 616/2016 + RAJESH KUMAR YADAV & ANR. Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 9309/2014& Ors. Page 1 of 8 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti ...
Cpl Rahul Kumar Santoshi vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~70 to 73 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 868/2018 Through: Ms.Nandadevi Deka, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with W/C A.K.Chauhan with JWO S.M.Pal, Air Force. Mr.Jagat Arora with Ms.Ritu Arora & Mr.Murad Khan, Advocates for R3/IBPS. W.P.(C) 3637/2018 & CM APPL. 14443/2018 Through: Mr.Manoj Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MANOJ KUMAR UNION OF INDIA & ORS + versus CPL RAHUL KUMAR SANTOSHI UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. + PRAKASH KATIYAR versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr.Aditya Madaan & Mr.Devank Maheshwari, Advocates for UOI/R1 to R3. W.P.(C) 6300/2018 & CM APPL. 24243/2018 Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) Nos. 868,3637, 6300 & 8189 of 2018 page 1 of 24 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with W/C A.K.Chauhan with JWO S.M.Pal, Air Force. Ms.Praveena Gautam with Mr.Jitesh P.Gupta, Mr.Pawan Shukla & Mr.Raja R...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »