Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balraj Singh and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 to 39 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7362/2016 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 7372/2016 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P. (C) 7362 of 2016 and batch Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 7373/2016 DEVENDER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Meh...
Satish Kumar & Ors. Vs.lt Governor Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~40, 41, 66 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7973/2016 SUBE SINGH Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P.(C) 8228/2016 KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P.(C) 8224/2016 SATISH KUMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P. (C) Nos. 7973, 8228 and 8224 of 2016 Page 1 of 11 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER2503.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. In all these peti...
Rahul Gupta & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 25, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1569/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6275/2019 RAHUL GUPTA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Mehta, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Pradeep Singh Ms. Aarti Tyagi, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.754/2015, under Sections 498- A/406/323/354A/5of IPC, registered at police station Mahindra Park, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 19th February, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pradeep Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute CRL.M.C. 1569/2019 Page 1 of 3...
Tata Aig Gen. Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.jagdish & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$-30 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 03.2019 MAC. APP. 396/2019 and CM APPL.13419-20/2019 TATA AIG GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD. S.P. Through: Mr. ..... Appellant Jain, Advocate with Ms.Amandeep Kaur, Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Mr. Abjijit Chakravarty and Ms. Akanksha, Advocates. JAGDISH & ORS. versus Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS 1. By the instant appeal, the appellant-the insurer, in effect, assails the quantum of compensation that has come to be awarded in favour of the respondent Nos.-1 to 8 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, in short 'the MV Act'. Concisely, the relevant facts are that on 19.04.2014 at about 2. 10:05a.m., Ms. Nanki Devi (since deceased)the mother of the claimants- respondent Nos.1 to 8, sustained injuries in a motor accident involving car MAC.APP. 396/2019 Page 1 of 5 bearing registration No.DL7P3264 in short 'the offending vehicle', and on account of injurie...
Sanman Distributors Pvt Ltd vs.ana Arc Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~4 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:25. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 2177/2019 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 10238-39/2019 SANMAN DISTRIBUTORS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar and Mr. Amit S. Chaddha, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Sanjay Chhabra, Mr. Mamik and Ms. Vijay Laxmi, Advocates. versus ANA ARC PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Risha Mittal and Ms. Arpan Wadhawan, Advocates for R-1. Court Mr. Aggarwal, Jai A Commissioner with Mr. Dehadrai and Mr. Sidharth Arora, Advocates for R-3. Mr. C.S. Gupta, Advocate for R-4. S.K. + W.P.(C) 12164/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 47211/2018, 52266- 67/2018, 515/2019 & 1705/2019 SANMAN DISTRIBUTORS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar and Mr. Amit S. Chaddha, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Sanjay S. Chhabra, Mr. Mamik and Ms. Vijay Laxmi, Advocates. versus ANA ARC PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Risha Mittal and Ms. ...
Naresh Kumar and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 to 39 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7362/2016 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 7372/2016 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P. (C) 7362 of 2016 and batch Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 7373/2016 DEVENDER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Meh...
Devender Kumar & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9309/2014 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate $~46, 47, 59 * + RAMESH KUMAR & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus + DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 12/2015 Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 616/2016 + RAJESH KUMAR YADAV & ANR. Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 9309/2014& Ors. Page 1 of 8 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti ...
Manoj Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~70 to 73 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 868/2018 Through: Ms.Nandadevi Deka, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with W/C A.K.Chauhan with JWO S.M.Pal, Air Force. Mr.Jagat Arora with Ms.Ritu Arora & Mr.Murad Khan, Advocates for R3/IBPS. W.P.(C) 3637/2018 & CM APPL. 14443/2018 Through: Mr.Manoj Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MANOJ KUMAR UNION OF INDIA & ORS + versus CPL RAHUL KUMAR SANTOSHI UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. + PRAKASH KATIYAR versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr.Aditya Madaan & Mr.Devank Maheshwari, Advocates for UOI/R1 to R3. W.P.(C) 6300/2018 & CM APPL. 24243/2018 Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) Nos. 868,3637, 6300 & 8189 of 2018 page 1 of 24 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with W/C A.K.Chauhan with JWO S.M.Pal, Air Force. Ms.Praveena Gautam with Mr.Jitesh P.Gupta, Mr.Pawan Shukla & Mr.Raja R...
Netrapal Singh vs.ravinder Kumar Kalyanai & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on :20. 02.2019 Judgment Pronounced on :25. 03.2019 + C.R.P. 37/2019 & C.M. No.6334/2019 (for Stay) NETRAPAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Preeti Singh, Dr. Swati Jindal & Mr. Shivam Jaiswal, Advocates. Versus RAVINDER KUMAR KALYANAI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. Impugned order dated 05.12.2018 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-03, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi ('ADJ') granting an unconditional leave to defend to the respondents/defendants in Civil Suit No.192/2018 CNR No.DLST01-001337-2018 under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.10,00,000/- filed by the petitioner/plaintiff, is the subject matter of challenge in this revision petition. C.R.P.37/2019 & C.M.No.6334/2019 Page 1 of 8 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner advanced a loan of Rs.10,00,000/- by cash on 01.08.201...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.sanju & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~40 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 03.2019 % MAC.APP. 406/2019 and CM APPL. 13564/2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate. SANJU & ORS versus Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS By the instant appeal, the appellant-The New India Assurance Co.1. Ltd. in short 'the Insurer', assails the impugned judgment/award dated 30.01.2019 passed by MACT-02 (West District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi to the limited extent of the right to recover the award amount from the driver and the owner of the offending vehicle i.e. the respondent Nos.8 and 9. Appellant seeks to have the recovery rights on the premise that the 2. driving licence held by the driver-the respondent No.8 at the time of the accident was not valid for driving a commercial vehicle inasmuch as the offending vehicle bearing registration No.HR-46D-4053, was Mahendra & Mahendra Alfa Passenger (Auto). M...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »