Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cpl Nakul Chandra Behera vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~70 to 73 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 868/2018 Through: Ms.Nandadevi Deka, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with W/C A.K.Chauhan with JWO S.M.Pal, Air Force. Mr.Jagat Arora with Ms.Ritu Arora & Mr.Murad Khan, Advocates for R3/IBPS. W.P.(C) 3637/2018 & CM APPL. 14443/2018 Through: Mr.Manoj Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MANOJ KUMAR UNION OF INDIA & ORS + versus CPL RAHUL KUMAR SANTOSHI UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. + PRAKASH KATIYAR versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr.Aditya Madaan & Mr.Devank Maheshwari, Advocates for UOI/R1 to R3. W.P.(C) 6300/2018 & CM APPL. 24243/2018 Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) Nos. 868,3637, 6300 & 8189 of 2018 page 1 of 24 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI with W/C A.K.Chauhan with JWO S.M.Pal, Air Force. Ms.Praveena Gautam with Mr.Jitesh P.Gupta, Mr.Pawan Shukla & Mr.Raja R...
Vice Chairman, Delhi Agricultural Mktg. Board vs.h.r.builders
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 307/2015 Date of Decision :25. h March, 2019 VICE CHAIRMAN, DELHI AGRICULTURAL MKTG. BOARD Through: Mr.P.C. Sharma, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus H.R.BUILDERS ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Renuka Arora, Ms.Shreya Sharma and Ms.Nikita Salwan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 15.02.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the 4 Nos. Building Blocks (5-8) for Commission Agent Shops, Wholeseller Shops including internal electrification and road work at fruit and vegetable and food grain market at IFC, O.M.P. 307/2015 Page 1 Ghazipur (PH-II) awarded by the petitioner to the respondent under Agreement No.F.25(22)/77/07/DAMB/Engg. dated 06.02.2008.2. It is not in di...
J S vs.s S
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:25. h March, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 86/2019 J S ..... Appellant CORAM: S S Through: Mr. S.K. Ahluwalia, Advocate. versus Through: None. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL132742019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL132732019 (delay in filing) 3. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 34 days delay in filing the present appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the application, prayer made in the application is allowed. Accordingly, delay of 34 days in filing the appeal is condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 86/2019 6. The present appeal is directed against the interim order dated 14.01.2019 passed by the Family Court on an application filed by the MAT.APP.(F.C.) 86/2019 Page 1 of 6 respondent/wife under Section 24...
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.make My Trip India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~ * 5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA1362019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr Tapesh Sankhla, Advocates. versus MAKE MY TRIP INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Mayank Nagi, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % ORDER2503.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) is directed against an order dated 26th September, 2017, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, (ITAT) New Delhi in ITA No.4721/Del/2014 for assessment year (AY) 2009-10.2. The question of law sought to be urged by the Revenue reads as under: Whether the ITAT erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 12,52,49,946/- made by the Assessing officer under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act,1961 being non deduction of TDS on account of payment gateway charges?. 3. The facts in brief are that the Assessee is engaged in the business of selling its travel product...
Ishwar Singh and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 to 39 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7362/2016 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 7372/2016 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P. (C) 7362 of 2016 and batch Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 7373/2016 DEVENDER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Meh...
Nirmala Devi & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1082/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 03.2019 NIRMALA DEVI & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS + BAIL APPLN. 1292/2018 SANDEEP KUMAR versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Ranbir Yadav and Mr. P. Raj, Advs. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Sunny Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2503.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.963/2015 under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of the IPC, Police Station Mukherjee BAIL APPLN. 1082/2018 & 1292/2018 Page 1 of 3 Nagar, New Delhi. The petitioners are the parents-in-law as well as brother-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and a suicide note has been recovered which has exonerated...
Devender Kumar @ Dhirender & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 25, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1554/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6237/2019 DEVENDER KUMAR @ DHIRENDER & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kunwar Nagendra & Mr. Narender Kumar, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-Statewith ASI Ravinder Kumar. Mr. Manzar Anis & Ms. Sanjana Premi, Advocates with respondents No.2 to 4 in person. CRL.M.C. 1537/2019 & Crl.M.A. 6136/2019 SH. ABDUL KALIM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manzar Anis & Ms. Sanjana STATE & ORS. Premi, Advocates. Versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Ravinder Kumar. Mr. Kunwar Nagendra & Mr. Narender Kumar, Advocates with respondents No.2 to 6 in person. CRL.M.C. 1554/2019 CRL.M.C. 1537/2019 Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned first petition [CRL.M.C. 1554/2019]., quashing of ...
Pushpandra Singh Parmar vs.uc Web Mobile Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~23 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:25. h March, 2019 RFA(OS) 16/2019 PUSHPANDRA SINGH PARMAR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Rahul Kumar versus and Mr. Raghwendra Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: UC WEB MOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED Through Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee, Ms. Jyoti Dastidar & Ms. Shreya Seth, Advocates. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL87642019 (delay in filing) 1. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 47 days delay in filing the present appeal.2. Prayer made in this application is not opposed. Accordingly, delay of 47 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. RFA(OS) 16/2019 4. This is an appeal under Section 10 of Delhi High Court Rules read with Section 96, read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 27.09.2018 passed by...
Sardar Gurbachan Singh & Ors. Vs.sardar Avtar Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 82/1997 & CC No.954/1999 SARDAR GURBACHAN SINGH & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Mercy Hussain & Ms. Tannya Sharma, Advs. Versus SARDAR AVTAR SINGH & ORS. ...... Defendants Through: Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Ms. Anjali Sharma, Mr. Deepak Bashta, Mr. Shashwat Bhardwaj & Mr. Abhimanyu Gupta, Advs. for D-1&3. Mr. Girdhar Govind & Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advs. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2503.2019 IA No.3611/2019 (of the defendants no.1 and 3 under Order XVI Rule 2 of the CPC) 1. The applicants / defendants no.1 and 3, by this application, after closure of evidence in this suit in terms of order dated 8th February, 2019, seek to summon and examine (i) Clerk from Indian Overseas Bank, Janpath, New Delhi; (ii) Clerk from State Bank of India, Overseas Branch, Vijaya Building 17, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi; (iii) Clerk from Dena Bank, 3 Mangal Bhawan Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi; and, (iv) Clerk...
Sanjay Sharma vs.sudhir Malhotra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~25 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :28. 02.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:25. 03.2019 F.A.O. No.73/2019 & CM No.8550/2019 (For Stay) SANJAY SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr.Bijender Singh and Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocates. Versus SUDHIR MALHOTRA & ORS. Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT VINOG GOEL, J.1. The impugned order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-04, South East District, Saket Court, New Delhi (ADJ), in Civil Suit No.8018/2016 dismissing the application of the appellant/plaintiff No.1 and the Respondent No.4/ Plaintiff No.2, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal. F.A.O.73/2019 Page 1 of 10 2. As per the factual matrix, the appellant and respondent no.4 jointly purchased an area of approximately 340 square feet, i.e, front port...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »