Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satish Pandey @ Sanjiv Pandey vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~R-95 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 793/2002 Decided on:26. h March, 2019 SATISH PANDEY @ SANJIV PANDEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate with Mr. M.K. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Ashish Sharma, PS Welcome. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant was tried by the court of Sessions on the charge under Section 20 of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short NDPS), the gravamen being that on 10.02.2001, at about 8:45 a.m., while being present at a public place (Welcome bus stand), near petrol pump G.T. Karnal Road, he was found having in his possession substance found to be charas to the extent of one kg and 100 gms. The prosecution led evidence that had been collected during investigation into the First Information Report (FIR) No.48 of 2001 (Ex.PW2/A), which had been registered at 10:35 a.m. on 10.02.2001 at PS Welcom...
Chitra Khanna vs.lt Governor National Capital Territory of Delhi and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~ * 60 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1623/2016 CHITRA KHANNA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Akhil Sachar, Advocate. versus LAC/ L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. Through: Mr Rajneesh Sharma, Advocate for LT GOVERNOR NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER2503.2019 1. The prayers in the present petition read as under: a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari and/or a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and after examining the legality and validity of the Notification dated 21.3.2003 being No.F11(19)/20G1/L&B/LA/20112 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Issued in respect of the land forming part of Village Barwala quash and set aside the same; b) Issue a Writ of Certiorari and/or a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and after examining the legality and validity of the ...
Krishan Kumar and Anr vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 to 39 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7362/2016 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 7372/2016 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P. (C) 7362 of 2016 and batch Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 7373/2016 DEVENDER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Meh...
Ikechukwu Chukwubuikem Stanley vs.narcotic Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 214/2019 Judgment delivered on:25. 03.2019 IKECHUKWU CHUKWUBUIKEM STANLEY ........ Petitioner versus NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate. Ms. P. Kumari, Adv. for Mr. P.C. Aggarwal, SPP CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2503.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 5608/2019 (Extension of bail) 1.... Petitioner seeks extension of interim bail granted by order dated 11.02.2019 on the ground that his wife who had undergone surgery requires four weeks time post discharge from the hospital for recovery purposes.2. Status report has been filed which has verified that the medical BAIL APPLN. 214/2019 Page 1 of 2 condition of the wife of the petitioner and also the recovery period which is certified by the doctor.3. Wife of the petitioner was discharged on 15.03.2019 from the hospital and as per the cert...
Rahul Yadav vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 25, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1553/2019 & CRL.M.As. 6232-6233/2019 RAHUL YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Brijender Singh Dhull, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Satender Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.327/2015, under Section 135 of The Indian Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Mehrauli, Delhi is sought on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 30th January, 2015 (Annexure P-2) issued by respondent No.2/complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved between the parties and No Dues Certificate has been already issued by CRL.M.C. 1553/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent No.2/complainant/first-informant of the FIR in que...
Allied Medical Ltd. Vs.uttar Pradesh Health Systems Strengthening Proj ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:28. 02.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:25. .03.2019 + FAO682019 & CM NO829419 (for stay) ALLIED MEDICAL LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa and Mr.Karanprret Singh, Advocates. Versus UTTAR PRADESH HEALTH SYSTEMS STRENGTHENING PROJECT ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shanta Pandey, Mr. Hiren Dasan, Mr. Rajive Ranjan, Mr. Harish Dasan and Mr. Chand Qureshi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The impugned order dated 12.02.2019 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-03, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (ADJ) dismissing the application of the appellant FAO682019 Page 1 of 15 under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short AACA) being ARB4372019 is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.2. The brief facts of the case are that the Government of India had received credit from the International Development Association (IDA) towards the Uttar P...
Pawan Gaur ..... Petitioner vs.the State (n.c.t of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:15th March, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:25. h March, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 784/2019 PAWAN GAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajay P. Tushir, Mr.Varun Malik and Mr.Satya Ranjn Swain, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State with SI Sushil Kumar, PS IGI Airport. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present petition under Articleof Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.341/2018, under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station IGI Airport, New Delhi. W.P (CRL)784/2019 Page 1 of 7 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 01.07.2018, the petitioner was departing from New Delhi to Bangalore, via Air Asia Flight No.15-721. That during screening of the baggage under tag No.0007070645 the compl...
Roopak Stores Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs.roopaks Pik-N-Pay & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~OS-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:25. 03.2019 + CS(COMM) 741/2017 ROOPAK STORES PVT. LTD. & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.M.K.Miglani, Adv. versus ROOPAKS PIK-N-PAY & ORS ..... Defendants Through Ms.Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Purvesh Buttan and Mr.Fahad Imtiaz, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.12504/2017 1. This application is filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 seeking injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing the trade mark ROOPAK of the plaintiffs by manufacturing, marketing, selling, offering for sale, dealing, etc. in all types and varieties of dry fruits, etc. under the trade mark/trade name ROOPAK/ROOPAKS PIK N PAY or any other trade mark/trade name which is identical and deceptively similar to the registered trade mark of the plaintiffs ROOPAK.2. It is the contention of the plaintiffs that pursuant to a Dissolution Deed dated 31.03.1993 in the partnership fir...
Om Prakash vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~33 to 39 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7362/2016 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 7372/2016 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Vinay Kumar and Mr. Omkar Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P. (C) 7362 of 2016 and batch Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 7373/2016 DEVENDER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with Mr. Aman Meh...
Krishan Kumar & Anr. Vs.lt Governor Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2019
$~40, 41, 66 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7973/2016 SUBE SINGH Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P.(C) 8228/2016 KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P.(C) 8224/2016 SATISH KUMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus LT GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. W.P. (C) Nos. 7973, 8228 and 8224 of 2016 Page 1 of 11 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER2503.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. In all these peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »