Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd. Vs.national Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :26. h March, 2019 + + O.M.P. (COMM) 85/2019 BHAGHEERATHA ENGINEERING LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.Amit George, Mr.V.M. Vishnu, Mr.Rishabh Dheer & Mr.Amol Acharya, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Siddharth Pandey & Ms.Isha Bansal, Advs. O.M.P. (COMM) 88/2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr.Siddharth ........ Petitioner Pandey versus Ms.Isha Bansal, Advs. & M/S BHAGHEERATHA ENGINEERING LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Dr.Amit George, Mr.V.M. Vishnu, Mr.Rishabh Dheer & Mr.Amol Acharya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.2962/2019 (Exemption) in O.M.P. (COMM) 85/2019 IA No.3058/2019 (Exemption) in O.M.P. (COMM) 88/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 85/2019 & 88/2019 Page 1 O.M.P. (COMM) 85/2019 & O.M.P. (COMM) 88/2019 & IA No.3059/2019 (Stay) 1. These two petitions have been filed unde...
Ravinder Singh & Anr. Vs.saresh Chand Punj Alias Suresh Chand Punj (Si ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h March, 2019 + CS(OS) No.169/2019 & IA No.4367/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC). RAVINDER SINGH & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vijay Kr. Gupta and Mr. Mehul Gupta, Advs. versus SARESH CHAND PUNJ ALIAS SURESH CHAND PUNJ (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRs & ORS ..... Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.4368/2019 (for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CS(OS) No.169/2019 & IA No.4367/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC).3. The two plaintiffs viz Ravinder Singh and Puneet Bahri have instituted this suit for specific performance and permanent injunction pleading:-"(i) that a) the deceased defendant no.1 Saresh Chand Punj @ Suresh Chand Punj (represented by his wife, daughter and two sons); b) defendant no.2 Vinod Kumar Punj @ Venode Kumar; and, c) Late Smt. Shashi Bala were the auction purchasers from the Office of Settlement Commissioner, Minist...
Dashrath Lal (Deceased) Thr. Lrs vs.dvb (Now Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2019 Decided on:26. h March, 2019 DASHRATH LAL (DECEASED) THR. LRs LPA942016 .....Appellants Through: Mr.Kamal Mehta, Advocate. versus DVB (NOW BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.) & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar with Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R1. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the legal representatives (LRs) (Appellants 2 to4) of late JUDGMENT Shri Dashrath Lal (Appellant No.1) and three others (Appellants 5 to7) is directed against the order dated 17th November 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing WP(C) 4093 of 2000.2. The challenge in the writ petition was to an order dated 8th March 2000 passed by the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB), the predecessor-in-interest of the Respondent No.1 BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BRPL) dismissing Appellant No.1 and three other employees (Appellants 5 to7) from service. The challenge was also to the order ...
State vs.raj Bahadur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 03.2019 CRL.REV.P. 813/2016 STATE RAJ BAHADUR versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. ASI Ram Roop, PS Subhash Place. For the Respondent : Ms. Mallika Parmar, Advocate, (DHCLSC) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 813/2016 & Crl.M.A.19624/2016 (for condonation of delay) 1.... Petitioner State impugns judgment dated 07.06.2016, whereby, the Appellate Court has reversed the judgment dated 18.09.2014, whereby, the respondent was held guilty of the offence under Sections 279/377/304A IPC and SectionsMotor Vehicles Act.2. Respondent was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years for the offence under Section 304A and 6 months for the offence under Section 279 IPC and 3 months for the offence under Section 337 IPC and one month simple ...
Sunita & Ors vs.arun Singh & Ors (The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 03.2019 % MAC.APP. 1079/2018 SUNITA & ORS Through Ms. Harsh Lata, Advocate. ..... Appellants versus ARUN SINGH & ORS (THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the instant appeal, the appellants, who are the widow, mother and son of the deceased Shri Chand, who died on account of a motor accident involving a bus bearing registration No.DL1C5038 the offending vehicle, are aggrieved of the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned judgment/Award dated 09.08.2018. in short A total compensation of Rs.5,74,000/- has come to be awarded by the 2. Tribunal under the different heads, as follows:-"MAC.APP. 1079/2018 Page 1 of 3 1.2. 3.4. Loss of dependency/Contribution to family: Loss of Estate: Loss of consortium: Funeral Charges:5. Medical Bills: Rs.5,03,412/- Rs. 15,...
Rahul Kumar Meena vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:26. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 7804/2018 RAHUL KUMAR MEENA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.D. Janger, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr.Dhruv Pande, Advocates for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.13648/2019 (for delay) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 30 days in filing the review petition.2. Notice. Counsel for the non-applicant accepts notice.3. For the reasons stated in the application the delay in filing the review petition stands condoned.4. C.M. stands disposed of. REVIEW PETITION No.122/2019 in W.P.(C) 7804/2018 Page 1 of 4 REVIEW PETITION No.122/2019 5. The applicant/respondent seeks review of the judgment dated 10.1.2019 more particularly the directions contained in paras 8 and 9 which we reproduce below:-"In the given facts of the case, the petiti...
Saurabh Chaudhary vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 959/2018 SAURABH CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Khosla and Mr. Sarvesh Tyagi, Advs. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with W/SI Rekha Ms. Sumeeta and Mr. Manish Lamba, Advs. for complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.37/2018 under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy.2. The allegations of the prosecutrix are that she came in contact with the petitioner while she was studying in Rajasthan. Thereafter they started talking to each other and became close friends. It is alleged that the petitioner even took her to his house in the village and families of the parties are known to each other. Therea...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.nalwa Sons Investment Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~41 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + ITA11422018 ITA11442018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Asheesh Jain, Sr.Std.Counsel with Date of Order:26. 03.2019 Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Jr.Std.Counsel versus NALWA SONS INVESTMENT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Vohra, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Kavita Jha, Ms.Devika Jain & Mr.Anant Mann, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, (Open Court) 1. These two appeals are preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (the Act hereafter); they challenge an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to two assessment years concerning the assessee-respondent.2. In ITA11422018, three questions of law are urged (i) with respect to the disallowance (under Section 14A) directed to be deleted by the ITAT; (ii) the write-off of principal amount of bad debts, which had been initially disallowed by the assessin...
Kanchan Saini vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
+ W.P.(C) 3679/2017 KANCHAN SAINI Reserved on: Pronounced on:19. 02.2019 26.03.2019 ........ Petitioner $~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.P.P. Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Prem Bhushan Dewan, Dr. Aurobindo Ghose, Ms.Gurjeet Kaur, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. with Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Adv. for DoE. Mr.Pradeep Kr. Jha, G.P. for R-4. Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Adv. for R-3. Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT For detailed judgment, see W.P. (C) 8597/2009 titled Swarn Bhanot Vs. University of Delhi & Ors. dated 26.03.2019. MARCH26 2019 ab (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE...
Parth Kalia & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 26, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1579/2019 & CRL.M.As. 6325-6326/2019 PARTH KALIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kanwarpreet Singh, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rambriksh Bhagat Ms. Nikita Agarwal, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.7/2018, under Sections 354/3of IPC, registered at Police Station Nehru Place Metro, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 16th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Rambriksh Bhagat, on ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »